Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Who's #1 (Part II)? The Media's 2016 Democratic Field

Bookmark and Share

Hillary and Joe are ranked 1-2 in eight of 11 outlets under analysis with Andrew Cuomo solidly in third

hillaryclinton11.jpgOn Monday, Smart Politics released a report that showed of the nearly two-dozen names that have been floated as potential 2016 Republican presidential candidates, only two were cited in each of the dozen media outlet rankings under analysis - Marco Rubio and Chris Christie.

Today's report examines how media coverage over the last four-plus months have seeded the Democratic field and finds that there is even more agreement as to who is the early frontrunner.

On Sunday, Bloomberg's Al Hunt wrote a column entitled, "Clinton Is Strongest-Ever Frontrunner. If She Runs."

Whether or not that is the case, the former First Lady, U.S. Senator, 2008 White House hopeful, and Secretary of State remains far and away the early leader in the clubhouse according to media speculation on the party's 2016 potential candidates.

Smart Politics examined the rankings of the 2016 Democratic presidential field across 11 media outlets in reports published over the four-plus months since the 2012 election and finds that 3 of the 20 candidates appear on every list: Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Andrew Cuomo.

The outlets under analysis include a mix of traditional media, digital media, and partisan media organizations: CBS News, Christian Science Monitor, Cox Media Group, Daily Caller, International Business Times, National Journal, Policy Mic, Prez16, The Run 2016, US News & World Report, and Washington Post (The Fix).

(Note: Most of the outlets listed above also ranked the potential 2016 contenders. For those that did not provide a numerical ranking, rankings were assigned based on the order in which the potential nominees were listed, provided they were not ordered alphabetically).

Clinton, Vice-President Joe Biden, and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo were each named in all 11 of the media outlets' listings of the 2016 Democratic presidential field.

Clinton was ranked first in nine of these outlets: CBS News, Christian Science Monitor, Daily Caller, International Business Times, National Journal, Policy Mic, Prez16, The Run 2016, and Washington Post's The Fix.

As a result, Clinton's weighted media ranking score was a near perfect 1.2.

By comparison, Rubio's GOP field leading score was double that at 2.4 across the dozen outlets analyzing his party's 2016 potential candidates.

Biden received top billing in the other two outlets under analysis (Cox Media and US News & World Report), was second in eight others, and fourth in Prez16's Democratic 'power rankings.'

Cuomo was listed third in six outlets, fourth in four, and fifth in one for a solid wrap on third place in the media's early estimation of the 2016 political landscape.

After Clinton, Biden, and Cuomo, the next most mentioned Democratic candidate in the 2016 field is Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley, who was listed in 10 reports (only omitted by US News & World Report, which featured only three candidates).

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick was fifth after being named in nine outlets, followed by Virginia U.S. Senator Mark Warner at eight, and another four possible candidates tied at seven each: New York U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Massachusetts U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer, and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

An additional 10 Democratic officeholders were listed across the 11 media reports: Newark Mayor Cory Booker (5), Minnesota U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (5), Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper (4), San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro (2), Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden (1), Iowa U.S. Senator Tom Harkin (1), Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano (1), Virginia U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (1), Delaware Governor Jack Markell (1), and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (1).

According to these early media power rankings, the prospects of a female Democratic nominee in 2016 appears to be significantly greater than one from the Republican Party even though five women were named in each party's 2016 field (and even if Clinton was excluded).

On the Republican side, its five potential female candidates were listed in a total of just 13 reports collectively: South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley (5), New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez (3), former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (3), former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin (1), and New Hampshire U.S. Senator Kelly Ayotte (1).

Governor Haley is the only GOPer to rank in her party's Top 10 across the dozen outlets under analysis (coming in at #10).

Meanwhile, the five women named on the Democratic side were listed in 31 reports collectively, with three in the Top 10 and a fourth at #11 (Amy Klobuchar): Hillary Clinton (11 outlets), Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand (7), Amy Klobuchar (5), and Janet Napolitano (1).

Among the 10 candidates named in at least half of these reports on the state of the Democratic 2016 field, Hillary Clinton is first with a 1.2 weighted rank average, followed by Joe Biden at 2.0, Andrew Cuomo at 3.5, Martin O'Malley at 5.4, Mark Warner at 6.4, Deval Patrick at 7.2, Kirsten Gillibrand and Elizabeth Warren at 7.3, Brian Schweitzer at 7.7, and Antonio Villaraigosa at 11.0.

Media Rankings of Potential 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidates

Candidate
# Outlets
Rank Ave.
Hillary Clinton
11
1.2
Joe Biden
11
2.0
Andrew Cuomo
11
3.5
Martin O'Malley
10
5.4
Deval Patrick
9
7.2
Mark Warner
8
6.4
Kirsten Gillibrand
7
7.3
Elizabeth Warren
7
7.3
Brian Schweitzer
7
7.7
Antonio Villaraigosa
7
11.0
Cory Booker
5
7.8
Amy Klobuchar
5
9.2
John Hickenlooper
4
9.0
Julian Castro
2
9.0
Beau Biden
1
4.0
Tom Harkin
1
7.0
Janet Napolitano
1
8.0
Tim Kaine
1
8.0
Jack Markell
1
14.0
Rahm Emanuel
1
16.0
Sources: CBS News, Christian Science Monitor, Cox Media Group, Daily Caller, International Business Times, National Journal, Policy Mic, Prez16, The Run 2016, U.S. News & World Report, and The Washington Post (The Fix). "Dark horse" candidates listed outside the Top 8 by Prez16 all received a ranking of '9.' Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Who's #1? The Media's 2016 Republican Field
Next post: Johnson to Retire with 2nd Longest Tenure on Capitol Hill in South Dakota History

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting