Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will Obama Become the Next William Howard Taft?

Bookmark and Share

Did the president hint at his next career ambition of becoming a Supreme Court justice during a recent news conference?

barackobama10.jpgDuring Barack Obama's press conference last Friday the issues surrounding the sequester took center stage.

But the president also took questions on other topics, including one from a reporter on the Proposition 8 case soon to be heard before the Supreme Court.

That reporter also asked a follow-up about why the administration does not argue marriage is a right that should be available to all Americans.

His response?

"And what we've said is, is that same-sex couples are a group, a class that deserves heightened scrutiny, that the Supreme Court needs to ask the state why it's doing it. And if the state doesn't have a good reason, it should be struck down. That's the core principle as applied to this case. Now, the Court may decide that if it doesn't apply in this case, it probably can't apply in any case. There's no good reason for it. If I were on the Court, that would probably be the view that I'd put forward."

Obama on the Court?

Was the president making a theoretical point, or did he just let something slip?

For one, Obama will exit elected office at a very young age - just 55 years old in January 2017.

Interestingly, that is just one year shy of when another former president left the White House - William Howard Taft in 1913.

Some eight years later, Taft became the 10th Chief Justice of the United States in 1921.

Of course, Taft had also served eight years earlier in his career as a judge for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, while Obama's legal background is that of a lecturer in constitutional law at the University of Chicago for about a decade before winning his Senate seat in 2004.

If Obama does have ambitions to one day serve on the Court, it will require not simply an opening on the Court while a Democrat serves in the White House, but also someone willing to depart from recent tradition - like Obama did with Elena Kagan - and appoint a nominee who had never previously served as a judge.

Kagan's confirmation ended a string of 11 consecutive Justices since 1975 who had prior judicial experience on their resumé - 10 of whom had served on the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Overall, more than three dozen Supreme Court justices previously never served as judges including John Jay, John Marshall, and Louis Brandeis as well as notable recent justices such as Byron White, Lewis Powell, and William Rehnquist.

But in an era in which the Court is already viewed as too political, it is unlikely we will ever see another ex-president serve on it again.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Can Virginia Make it 10 in a Row as the Nation's Naysayer?
Next post: Norm Coleman: Minnesota's Forgotten Man?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting