Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will Obama Become the Next William Howard Taft?

Bookmark and Share

Did the president hint at his next career ambition of becoming a Supreme Court justice during a recent news conference?

barackobama10.jpgDuring Barack Obama's press conference last Friday the issues surrounding the sequester took center stage.

But the president also took questions on other topics, including one from a reporter on the Proposition 8 case soon to be heard before the Supreme Court.

That reporter also asked a follow-up about why the administration does not argue marriage is a right that should be available to all Americans.

His response?

"And what we've said is, is that same-sex couples are a group, a class that deserves heightened scrutiny, that the Supreme Court needs to ask the state why it's doing it. And if the state doesn't have a good reason, it should be struck down. That's the core principle as applied to this case. Now, the Court may decide that if it doesn't apply in this case, it probably can't apply in any case. There's no good reason for it. If I were on the Court, that would probably be the view that I'd put forward."

Obama on the Court?

Was the president making a theoretical point, or did he just let something slip?

For one, Obama will exit elected office at a very young age - just 55 years old in January 2017.

Interestingly, that is just one year shy of when another former president left the White House - William Howard Taft in 1913.

Some eight years later, Taft became the 10th Chief Justice of the United States in 1921.

Of course, Taft had also served eight years earlier in his career as a judge for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, while Obama's legal background is that of a lecturer in constitutional law at the University of Chicago for about a decade before winning his Senate seat in 2004.

If Obama does have ambitions to one day serve on the Court, it will require not simply an opening on the Court while a Democrat serves in the White House, but also someone willing to depart from recent tradition - like Obama did with Elena Kagan - and appoint a nominee who had never previously served as a judge.

Kagan's confirmation ended a string of 11 consecutive Justices since 1975 who had prior judicial experience on their resumé - 10 of whom had served on the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Overall, more than three dozen Supreme Court justices previously never served as judges including John Jay, John Marshall, and Louis Brandeis as well as notable recent justices such as Byron White, Lewis Powell, and William Rehnquist.

But in an era in which the Court is already viewed as too political, it is unlikely we will ever see another ex-president serve on it again.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Can Virginia Make it 10 in a Row as the Nation's Naysayer?
Next post: Norm Coleman: Minnesota's Forgotten Man?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

Political Crumbs

The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting