Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Joe Miller, You Will Be Challenged

Bookmark and Share

Fifty-one Republican candidates have run in the 19 Alaska U.S. Senate primaries conducted since 1960

joemiller10.jpgFailed 2010 Alaska U.S. Senate Republican nominee Joe Miller ended speculation on his future political plans on Sunday by announcing he was forming an exploratory committee to launch another bid in 2014.

Miller was one of a handful of 2010 insurgent GOP Senate nominees (e.g. Nevada's Sharron Angle, Delaware's Christine O'Donnell) whose primary victories over establishment candidates jeopardized the party's goal of taking control of the nation's upper legislative chamber that cycle.

Miller narrowly defeated Alaska incumbent Lisa Murkowski in the GOP primary that August, but a historic write-in campaign by Murkowski ultimately held the seat for the Republican Party that November with a plurality of the vote.

But although Miller could command a large swath of tea party support again in a 2014 campaign, no one expects the anti-establishment candidate to walk away with the nomination - at least not without a challenge that is.

And Alaskan electoral history bears that out.

Over the decades, Alaska's primary system has varied from single ballot open primaries, to blanket primaries, to party-rule ballot primaries.

Of the 19 primaries conducted since 1960, 51 Republicans have appeared on the ballot, and in only three instances did a GOPer go unchallenged.

Each of those three cycles involved an incumbent Republican Senator: Ted Stevens in 1972 and 1978 and Frank Murkowski in 1986.

The 2014 contest will mark the first time without a Republican incumbent on Alaska's U.S. Senate primary ballot since 1980.

During the six cycles in which a Republican incumbent was not running for reelection from 1960-1980, a total of 21 GOPers vied for the nomination, or 3.5 per cycle.

Miller's preference - other than facing no primary challengers - is probably to see as many Republicans as possible run for the seat, particularly known GOP officeholders.

That would help ensure that the establishment vote could be split into smaller and smaller fractions while Miller attempts to hold on to his core Tea Party support and eke out a victory.

By contrast, if Miller goes head-to-head with, say, potential candidate Lieutenant Governor Mead Treadwell, he may find himself on the wrong end of a much closer race.

The winner of the Republican primary will face one-term Democratic incumbent Mark Begich in November 2014.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Can Colbert Busch End the Nation's Largest Democratic Pick-Up Drought?
Next post: Bachmann Fundraising Falls 61 Percent from 2011

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting