Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Obama Has Mentioned Terrorism Nearly 1,500 Times as President

Bookmark and Share

Although accused by some of being too stingy with using the term, the president has mentioned terrorism (and variants of the word) an average of one time per day while in office

barackobama10.jpgBarack Obama was criticized in some quarters on Monday when his initial public remarks about the bombings at the Boston marathon failed to mention the word "terrorism."

Instead Obama closed his speech by calling it a "tragedy."

But in the President's remarks the next day, he made headline news when he called the Boston bombings an "act of terror" - purportedly after coming under pressure for the omission during Monday's statement.

This is not the first time Obama has been taken to task for failing to call violent, deadly acts "terrorism," but a survey of the president's speeches, addresses, and written statements finds the president has hardly been gun-shy when using the term across his 4+ years in office.

A Smart Politics analysis finds that Barack Obama has mentioned terrorism or one of its related usages 1,469 times across 530 different remarks and written statements since becoming president prior to the Boston bombing.

Smart Politics combed through the Public Papers of the President and tallied every mention of terrorism and related usages (terror, terrorist, terrorize, counterterrorism, bioterrorism, antiterrorism, counterterrorist, narcoterrorist etc.).

Since his first day in office until April 14, 2013, Obama mentioned terror 1,469 times, or an average of 1 time per day.

In fact, Obama used the term on his first day in office, during his first speech - the Inaugural Address:

"And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken. You cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you." - January 20, 2009

Obama also brought up the problem of terrorism during his Address accepting his Nobel Peace Prize award in Oslo in December 2009:

"Terrorism has long been a tactic, but modern technology allows a few small men with outsized rage to murder innocents on a horrific scale." - December 10, 2009

Overall, Obama has discussed terror in 530 different remarks and statements during his presidency including 14 weekly addresses, 21 formal addresses, 26 interviews, and 55 news conferences.

The president has used the term terror or one of its derivations in spoken form 779 times since taking office with another 690 mentions in written statements (e.g. proclamations, messages to Congress, executive orders etc.).

The president has used the term "terrorist" 712 times, with 435 mentions for "terrorism," 216 for "counterterrorism," 77 for "terror," 18 for "terrorize," five for "bioterrorism," four for "antiterrorism," and one each for "counterterrorist" and "narcoterrorist."

Obama's omission of the word "terrorism" in Monday's remarks comes on the heels of a high profile linguistic dance involving the president and his critics after the assassination of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya last fall, with some saying Obama failed to label it an act of terror in a timely manner for political purposes.

That charge came to a head in an October 16, 2012 presidential debate when Republican nominee Mitt Romney doubted the president's claim that he had stood in the Rose Garden and called the Benghazi assassination an "act of terror":

Romney: You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack it was an act of terror? It was not a spontaneous demonstration?

Obama: Please proceed.

Romney: Is that what you're saying?

Obama: Please proceed, Governor.

Romney: I want to make sure we get that for the record, because it took the President 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.

Obama: Get the transcript.

Candy Crowley (debate moderator): He did, in fact, sir. So let me--call it an act of terror in the Rose Garden. He used the word----

Obama: Can you say that a little louder, Candy?

Crowley: He did call it an act of terror. It did, as well, take 2 weeks or so for the whole idea of there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.

That controversial exchange became the most talked about moment of the debate with the president seemingly winning that round.

However, perhaps not coincidentally, the president, who had not mentioned terrorism during the previous 17 days of the campaign prior to the debate, went on to use the term 22 times over the next 11 days.

Although Obama has discussed terrorism in hundreds and hundreds of speeches and written documents, he has done less so in recent years.

In fact, Obama has used the term less frequently in each subsequent year in office, declining from 1.26 mentions per day in office in 2009, to 1.15 in 2010, 0.78 in 2011, 0.72 in 2012, and 0.63 in 2013 prior to the Boston bombing.

President Barack Obama Mentions of Terrorism by Year, 2009-2013

Year
# Mentions
Days
Per day
2009
436
346
1.26
2010
419
365
1.15
2011
283
365
0.78
2012
265
366
0.72
2013
66
104*
0.63
Total
1,469
1,546
0.95
* Through April 14, 2013. Includes mentions of terror, terrorism, terrorist, terrorize, counterterrorism, bioterrorism, antiterrorism, counterterrorist, narcoterrorist. Data compiled by Smart Politics from a study of the Public Papers of the President.

Over the years, Obama has used the term 'terror' to refer to a variety of events including terrorism at home and abroad, nuclear terrorism, bioterrorism, as well as gun violence (e.g. Aurora).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Bachmann Fundraising Falls 61 Percent from 2011
Next post: Off the Radar? Chechnya Never Mentioned in Public by Obama

3 Comments


  • terrorist is public enemy i hope in the future no terror again.

  • I think the major complaint from the right is actually that he does not use the words "Islamic terrorism" or "Islamic Extremism." In fact, a few days ago he was talking about "non-secular" terrorists. What is a non-secular terrorist? A religious terrorist. And which religion is terrorizing us? Islam. (Please pay attention to my words. I did not say every Muslim is a terrorist. I'm saying that those who have declared a religious war on us are Muslims.)
    P.S. Candy Crowley was wrong.

  • Well, terrorism is a major issue today and probably one of the most important topics during his meetings with other advisers. It shows that he is aware of the situation and I am glad for that. How many times had George W. Bush mentioned the word? Maybe he should have mentioned it more often. Praise Barack Obama.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting