Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Collin Peterson's Fundraising Numbers Not a Retirement 'Tell'

Bookmark and Share

Although Democratic alarm bells are ringing, Peterson's off-year fundraising tally is actually up in 2013 compared to his average hauls over the last decade

collinpeterson10.jpgSpeculation continues that 12-term Minnesota U.S. Representative Collin Peterson might retire at the end of his term after new numbers came out revealing the congressman's third quarter fundraising efforts.

Those numbers show Peterson to have raised approximately $83,000 from July through September to bring his year-to-date tally to $364,000.

Peterson - who will be 70 on Election Day next November - has not attempted to silence these rumors by stating unequivocally that he would run for a 13th term, but his campaign dismissed the congressman's fundraising numbers as a sign he would step down.

From a Peterson campaign statement reported by Roll Call:

"It's premature to read too much into Congressman Peterson's report this fundraising quarter given that he does not yet have an opponent, he is still considering whether he will run again, and the amount raised is similar to what he's raised previously in off-year quarters."

Is that true or is that campaign spin?

A Smart Politics review of Representative Peterson's fundraising efforts over the last decade show the congressman's 2013 tally is right on target - and actually exceeding similar off-year tallies.

Over the five previous cycles from 2003 through 2011, Peterson's average third quarter off-year fundraising tally was $94,460 - similar to this year's $83K.

In fact, Peterson raised more money in Q3 2013 than he did in the same period in 2003 ($61,660), 2005 ($70,378), and 2011 ($69,898).

The only cycles over the last decade in which he had a healthier total were in 2007 ($162,459) and 2009 ($107,907) - understandable considering Peterson, who has always been PAC-heavy in his fundraising, was the Agricultural Committee Chair during those years.

The $364K Peterson has raised during the first nine months of 2013 is also above his five-cycle average at this stage of the campaign.

From 2003 through 2011, Representative Peterson brought in an average three-quarter haul of $320,896 in off-years.

In other words, Peterson's 2013 tally is actually up 13.4 percent from his average tally over the last decade at this stage of the campaign, and 60 percent higher than his $227,460 average amount raised in 2003 ($96,110), 2005 ($252,963), and 2011 ($333,307) - the cycles before and after his Agriculture Committee chairmanship.

Republicans are, of course, salivating at the notion of a Peterson retirement given the GOP-lean of the district.

Minnesota's 7th CD would be one of the party's prime pick-up opportunities across the country.

The congressman has been reelected by an average margin of 28.6 points over the last 11 cycles including a comfortable 17.6-point win during the Republican tsunami of 2010.

Collin Peterson Off-Year Fundraising, 2003-2013

Year
Q3
YTD
2003
$61,660
$96,110
2005
$70,378
$252,963
2007*
$162,459
$522,336
2009*
$107,907
$399,767
2011
$69,898
$333,307
2013
$83,000
$364,000
Note: YTD column reflect money raised during the first three quarters of each year. * Denotes a cycle in which Peterson was Chair of the Agriculture Committee. ** Preliminary campaign estimate. Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is There a Doctor in the Senate?
Next post: Tom Foley and GOP Eye Rare Split-Ticket Upset in Connecticut

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting