Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Is There a Doctor in the Senate?

Bookmark and Share

Elections in Georgia and Louisiana could bring the number of physicians in the Senate in 2015 to its highest level in 150+ years

randpaul10.jpgHealth care legislation has been front and center during the Obama presidency and, more than three years after its passage, the Affordable Care Act continues to divide Congress and the nation.

Far from supportive of Obamacare, the number of physicians serving in the Senate is now at its highest mark in nearly a century, with this bloc possibly growing its numbers after the 2014 elections.

The 113th Congress currently has three physicians in the U.S. Senate - all Republicans: Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, John Barrasso of Wyoming, and Rand Paul of Kentucky.

Coburn's background is in obstetrics and family medicine, Barrasso's is in orthopedic surgery, and Paul's is in ophthalmology.

And what about the Democrats?

It's been nearly 45 years since the last Democratic medical doctor served in the chamber - Alaska's Ernest Gruening (1959-1969).

With three physicians currently in the legislative body, the number of physicians-turned-U.S. Senators is now at its highest level in 88 years.

The last time three medical doctors served in the Senate was in early 1925 when Republican Lewis Ball of Delaware closed out his term alongside Democrats Royal Copeland of New York and Woodbridge Ferris of Michigan.

After Copeland's death in 1938, no physician served in the chamber over the next 20 years until Gruening took office.

After Gruening lost his reelection bid in 1968, there were no physicians in the Senate for 26 years until Tennessee Republican Bill Frist took his seat in January 1995.

Depending on how the 2014 races unfold in the red states of Georgia and Louisiana there could be as many as four or five physicians in the Senate come January 2015.

In Georgia, four-term Congressman Paul Broun and six-term Congressman Phil Gingrey are vying for the GOP nomination in a crowded field to fill the seat of retiring Senator Saxby Chambliss.

Broun - a former medical officer in the U.S. Navy and general practitioner - prominently features his views on health care (that is, Obamacare) on his campaign website landing page:

Gingrey, meanwhile, ran a pro-life OB-GYN practice in Marietta, Georgia for a quarter-century and delivered more than 5,200 babies.

In Louisiana, three-term U.S. Representative Bill Cassidy is expected to be the main challenger to three-term Democratic incumbent Senator Mary Landrieu.

Cassidy co-founded the Greater Baton Rouge Community Clinic and remains an associate professor of medicine at Louisiana State University.

If one of these physicians is elected next November, the Senate will be comprised of four medical doctors for the first time since before the Civil War.

Four physicians last served together in the Senate more than 150 years ago in early 1859 when Republican Benjamin Wade of Ohio and Democrats Graham Fitch of Indiana, Martin Bates of Delaware, and William Gwin of California all were in office.

According to U.S. Senate historical records, 52 members of the body have been physicians since 1789, or 2.7 percent of the 1,948 who have served - though there has been a significant decrease in the number of medical doctors elected or appointed to the Senate over the last century.

During the 112-year period from 1789 until 1900, a total of 41 physicians served in the nation's upper legislative chamber.

Over the last 112 years since 1901, only 11 physicians have been elected or appointed to the Senate.

In fact, there have been fewer physicians who entered the Senate over the last 100 years (10) than the first 25 years (13), when the chamber had approximately one-third as many seats.

Put another way, from 1789 until the end of the Civil War in 1865, an average of 5.0 percent of Senate seats were held by physicians compared to just 1.1 percent from 1866 through 2013.

Overall, a yearly average of 1.9 percent of the Senate has been populated by physicians in U.S. history, with peaks of 11.8 percent in 1807 and 1809 and 11.1 percent in 1811, 1812, 1813, and 1814.

The largest number of physicians in the Senate at any point in time is five - reached in 1857 when there were 66 seats in the chamber: Republicans Benjamin Wade of Ohio and Amos Nourse of Maine and Democrats Graham Fitch of Indiana, Martin Bates of Delaware, and William Gwin of California.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Will Wisconsin Elect a Female Governor in 2014?
Next post: Collin Peterson's Fundraising Numbers Not a Retirement 'Tell'

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting