Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Tom Foley and GOP Eye Rare Split-Ticket Upset in Connecticut

Bookmark and Share

For the first time in the Democratic vs Republican era, one party could sweep Connecticut's congressional seats while the other wins the governorship

tomfoley10.jpgWith all five incumbent U.S. Representatives running for reelection in Connecticut in 2014, Democrats are projected to run the table for a party record fourth consecutive cycle in the Nutmeg State.

At the top of the ticket, however, Dan Malloy is viewed as one of the most vulnerable Democratic governors in the country with Larry Sabato calling his seat a 'tossup' and Charlie Cook and Stu Rothenberg only giving a modest 'lean Democratic' advantage to the race.

2010 Republican nominee Tom Foley is likely to be in the hunt again, exploring a run three years after his razor-thin 0.6-point defeat, and appears to be the odds-on favorite to carry the GOP torch again this cycle.

So could both of these outcomes come to pass in November 2014 - with a schizophrenic Connecticut electorate splitting their ticket by electing one political party into the U.S. House and another to run the state in Hartford?

It's never happened in the Republican-Democratic era.

A Smart Politics analysis finds that all 21 times one party has swept Connecticut's U.S. House races in a gubernatorial election cycle since 1856, that party has also won the governor's race each time.

Foley, of course, does not have a clear path to the GOP nomination, although he is the heavy favorite in early polling.

Connecticut Senate Minority Leader John McKinney is also vying for the nomination with fellow State Senator Toni Boucher and Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton also eying bids.

The last time a partisan sweep occurred in U.S. House contests during a gubernatorial election cycle was 2010 when Malloy was elected to his first term and Democratic incumbents John Larson, Joe Courtney, Rosa DeLauro, Jim Himes, and Chris Murphy all secured another two years in Congress.

That was the first time in more than a half-century either party had notched such an accomplishment in the state.

Connecticut Democrats last claimed such victories in 1958 when Governor Abraham Ribicoff won his second term and Democrats Emilio Daddario, Chester Bowles, Robert Giaimo, Donald Irwin, John Monagan, and Frank Kowalski swept Connecticut's six congressional districts that cycle.

Republicans last achieved this feat in 1942 when Raymond Baldwin was elected to his first term as governor and GOPers William Miller, John McWilliams, Ranulf Compton, Clare Luce, Joseph Talbot, and B.J. Monkiewicz ran the table in races for the U.S. House.

Since the Republican Party first appeared on the ballot in the state in 1856, Republican nominees for governor were elected every cycle during which the party swept the state's congressional district races: in 1858, 1864, 1894, 1896, 1898, 1900, 1902, 1904, 1906, 1908, 1914, 1920, 1924, 1926, 1928, and 1942.

(Connecticut Republicans also swept the congressional elections of 1956, but there was no gubernatorial race that year with the state recently switching to four-year terms).

During this 150+-year span, Democratic gubernatorial nominees were also victorious in each cycle during which their party swept the state's U.S. House contests: in 1912, 1936, 1940, 1958, and 2010.

(Democrats also won all of Connecticut's congressional district races during the non-gubernatorial cycles of 1964, 2008, and 2012).

Digging back further into history from the birth of the modern two-party system in 1828 but before the formation of the Republican Party, there is only example in the state of a party failing to win the governor's office in the same year it claimed every U.S. House seat.

In 1846, the Whigs won all four of the state's congressional districts (with incumbents James Dixon, Samuel Hubbard, John Rockwell, and Truman Smith) while Democrat Isaac Toucey eked out a 1.1-point plurality victory over Whig nominee Clark Bissell in the governor's race.

Each of the other 10 years during which one party carried all of Connecticut's U.S. House seats found that same party winning the governor's race:

· The National Republicans (Anti-Jacksonians): 1828, 1830, 1832
· The Democrats: 1836, 1842, and 1852
· The Whigs: 1838, 1840, 1844, and 1854

Including data from this pre-Republican Party era, the party sweeping congressional elections has won the governor's race in 31 of 32 cycles since 1828.

It is of course not a given that Connecticut's five Democratic incumbents will win reelection in 2014. (It is possible the GOP could win the governor's mansion as well as pick up a House seat).

However, no Republican nominee came within five points of defeating a Democrat in a Connecticut U.S. House race during the friendly political climate of 2010 when the GOP netted 63 seats nationwide with the state's previous redistricting map.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Collin Peterson's Fundraising Numbers Not a Retirement 'Tell'
Next post: Five of a Kind

1 Comment


  • That is to say Foley is the nominee. There are much better candidates on the Republican side he some rich guy trying to us his way to office. I for one will not be opting for Foly should he be the candidate.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Slam Dunk: Will 36 Record Presidential Winning Streaks Continue in 2016?

    Three-dozen states are currently in the midst of their longest Democratic or Republican presidential winning streaks.

    Political Crumbs

    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    Two Dakotas, One Voice?

    For each of the last 24 presidential elections since 1920, North and South Dakota have voted in unison - casting their ballots for the same nominee. For 21 of these cycles (including each of the last 12 since 1968) Republicans carried the Dakotas with just three cycles going to the Democrats (1932, 1936, and 1964). This streak stands in contrast to the first few decades after statehood when North and South Dakota supported different nominees in four of the first seven cycles. North Dakota narrowly backed Populist James Weaver in 1892 while South Dakota voted for incumbent Republican Benjamin Harrison. In 1896, it was North Dakota backing GOPer William McKinley while South Dakota supported Democrat William Jennings Bryan by less than 200 votes. North Dakota voted Democratic in 1912 and 1916 supporting Woodrow Wilson while South Dakota cast its Electoral College votes for Progressive Teddy Roosevelt and Republican Charles Hughes respectively.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting