Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Sarvis Notches 3rd Best Libertarian Gubernatorial Mark in US History

Bookmark and Share

The Virginian has the best showing in a gubernatorial race for a Libertarian in 11 years and easily records the third best showing in party history

robertsarvis10.jpgAlthough he fell short of the highly-prized 10 percent mark - which would have given his party a ballot line in Virginia elections through 2021 - Libertarian gubernatorial nominee Robert Sarvis accomplished something only two of the more than 200 previous candidates from his party have achieved over the last four-plus decades.

Sarvis won 6.5 percent of the vote Tuesday in a competitive contest won by Democratic nominee Terry McAuliffe over Republican Ken Cuccinelli.

That marks the third best ever performance by a Libertarian in a gubernatorial election since the founding of the party in the early 1970s.

(Note: Excluded are write-in candidates or candidates appearing on the ballot as an independent who may have received a Libertarian endorsement (e.g. Ed Clark's independent bid in California's 1978 race where he won 5.5 percent of the vote)).

A total of 208 candidates have appeared on the gubernatorial general election ballot as Libertarians over the decades through the 2013 cycle, and only two won a larger percentage of the vote than Sarvis.

The best ever showing by a Libertarian gubernatorial candidate came in Alaska in 1982 with nominee Dick Randolph.

Randolph was a former Republican State Representative in the early 1970s who became the first Libertarian elected to state government in the country, winning two additional terms as a Libertarian in the Alaska House in 1978 and 1980.

In 1982, Randolph was the Libertarian nominee for governor and won 14.9 percent behind Democratic winner Bill Sheffield and Republican Tom Fink.

Wisconsin's Ed Thompson (brother of former four-term GOP governor and then Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson) owns the silver medal with the 10.5 percent he won in 2002 as Republican incumbent Scott McCallum fell to Democrat Jim Doyle by just 3.7 points.

Prior to Sarvis, the only other Libertarian to reach 5 percent in a race for governor was Arizona's Sam Steiger in 1982.

Steiger was a former five-term Republican U.S. Representative and the GOP 1976 U.S. Senate nominee (losing to Dennis DeConcini) and received 5.1 percent of the gubernatorial vote in 1982 in a race won by Democratic incumbent Bruce Babbitt.

Interestingly, Democrats were victorious in each of these four races in which Libertarians captured at least five percent of the vote.

Overall, 20 Libertarians have reached three percent of the vote in races for governor since the 1970s.

Top 20 Libertarian Gubernatorial Performances in U.S. History

Rank
Year
State
Candidate
Percent
1
1982
Alaska
Dick Randolph
14.9
2
2002
Wisconsin
Ed Thompson
10.5
3
2013
Virginia
Robert Sarvis
6.5
4
1982
Arizona
Sam Steiger
5.1
5
1990
New Hampshire
Miriam Luce
4.9
6
1997
New Jersey
Murray Sabrin
4.7
7
2002
Oregon
Tom Cox
4.6
8
1994
New Hampshire
Steven Winter
4.4
9
1992
North Carolina
Scott McLaughlin
4.1
9
1994
South Dakota
Nathan Barton
4.1
11
2010
Georgia
John Monds
4.0
11
2012
Indiana
Rupert Boneham
4.0
11
1992
New Hampshire
Miriam Luce
4.0
14
1998
Wyoming
Dave Dawson
3.9
15
2012
Montana
Ronald Vandevender
3.8
15
2006
Georgia
Garrett Hays
3.8
17
1998
Georgia
Jack Cashin
3.4
18
1984
Montana
Larry Dodge
3.3
18
1990
Texas
Jeff Daiell
3.3
20
1994
Arizona
John Buttrick
3.1
Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Eight is Enough?
Next post: Virginia's 'National Naysayer' Streak Ends While New Jersey's Continues

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting