Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Pollsters Ignoring Rick Perry's 2016 'Campaign'

Bookmark and Share

Only two of 13 GOP 2016 primary polls conducted since April have included the Texas governor's name

rickperry10.jpgRick Perry continues to make headlines for what is ostensibly a long-term, packaged roll-out for another run at the White House in 2016.

But if Governor Perry once again fancies himself a presidential candidate, the nation's pollsters are not convinced.

A Smart Politics review of 2013 polling data finds that Rick Perry ranks as just the 11th most listed Republican candidate in horse race polling questions of the GOP presidential primary field for the 2016 cycle.

(Note: Data from 17 polls were compiled across seven survey organizations: CNN, Farleigh Dickinson, Marist, Reuters, PPP, Quinnipiac, and Rasmussen).

The names of only three Republicans have been given as a choice to survey respondents in each of these polls: New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, and Florida U.S. Senator Marco Rubio.

Perry's name, meanwhile, has appeared in only five polls all year and in just two of the last 13 since April.

And while the media may not feel Governor Perry is a viable candidate, given his 2012 campaign debacle, his decision not to run for a fourth term in Texas in early July was largely seen as a marker for launching another presidential bid in 2016.

But the pollsters have not responded in kind.

Only two of nine polls released by five different survey organizations since then have included Perry's name in GOP primary questions (Marist's July poll and CNN's November survey).

Public Policy Polling included Perry's name in its first three surveys of the year, but in none of the last four since.

The most frequently named 2016 Republican candidates offered to respondents in survey questions after Christie, Bush, and Rubio are Wisconsin U.S. Representative Paul Ryan and Kentucky U.S. Senator Rand Paul - each appearing in 15 polls, or 88 percent of horse race surveys.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal is next with 12, followed by Texas U.S. Senator Ted Cruz with 10, 2012 presidential candidate Rick Santorum with nine, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez with six, and Perry in 11th with five.

The only Republicans presented as a 2016 option less frequently to respondents were 2008 presidential candidate Mike Huckabee with two, and Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice with one.

Tea Party friendly U.S. Senators Paul and Cruz have been getting the attention of pollsters over the last seven-plus months.

Cruz's name was not included in any of the first six surveys conducted between January and April, but has been listed in 10 of 11 since (in all but Rasmussen's August poll).

Paul's name, meanwhile, was omitted as a choice for survey respondents in two of the half-dozen surveys conducted during the first four months of the year (by Reuters in March and Farleigh Dickinson in April), but has been included in every survey since.

Governor Christie has led in eight of the last 11 GOP horse race surveys of 2013 with Paul leading in two and Cruz in one.

Senator Rubio led in six of the first seven polls conducted this year, sandwiched around one survey in which Representative Ryan was on top.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Bob Smith and the 12-Year Itch
Next post: Can Dayton Catch Lightning in a Bottle Twice?

1 Comment


  • The Regressive Party Presidential candidates Clown Car is starting to fill up. None of these clowns could be/should be considered Presidential Timber. Paul Ryan? Rand Paul? Ted Cruz? Rick Perry? Frothy Santorum? These are the best and brightest the Regressive Party has to offer? What a joke. Hilary in 2016 and 2020!

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting