Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Collin Peterson: My Coffers Are Fine, Thank You Very Much

Bookmark and Share

You wouldn't know it from the media, but Peterson just recorded his strongest off-year 4th Quarter fundraising haul ever - coming in at nearly 75 percent higher than his average receipts over the previous decade

collinpeterson10.jpgNow that Congress finally passed a farm bill, will Collin Peterson get some love from the media?

The Congressman has still not yet stated whether he will run for reelection in 2014, but press reports would have one believe he is already in trouble.

Republicans, of course, have been frustrated for years that they haven't been able to run a competitive candidate in Peterson's GOP-leaning district.

Democrats, though pleased to hold the seat, have been rankled by many of the conservative Democrat's votes over the years (e.g. voting against the Affordable Care Act and 2009 stimulus).

The media, meanwhile, continues to cast Peterson as a lawmaker nearing retirement who is unable (or unwilling) to raise sufficient funds to lock down his seat for a potential 2014 reelection bid.

Just this week, the 12-term lawmaker was singled out by The Hill as one of five fundraising "losers" in Congress for his receipts collected during the 4th Quarter of 2013.

The article adds, "The low totals hint he might not run again."

But, as reported by Smart Politics four months ago after Peterson's 3rd Quarter numbers were released and Roll Call labeled Peterson's fundraising 'low,' his receipts in both quarters have been right on target for a reelection campaign based on previous cycles.

In fact, Peterson just notched the best off-year 4th Quarter of his political career.

A Smart Politics analysis of Collin Peterson's FEC fundraising data finds that his $164K haul last quarter is the most he has raised in the 4th Quarter of an off-year since at least 1995.

(FEC fundraising data is not yet retrievable for Peterson's 1990, 1992, and 1994 campaigns).

Peterson's previous off-year 4th Quarter best came in 2007 when he chaired the House Agriculture Committee.

During October through December of that year, he received $139,341.

Two years later, in Q4 2009, Peterson raised $121,510 (when he was still the committee chair).

Over the five cycles from 2003 through 2011, Peterson averaged only $94,732 in the fourth quarter of off-years.

That makes his recent $164,634 haul 74 percent above average over the last decade during the same period. (Note: Peterson cruised to victory by an average margin of 32 points during these five cycles).

To put the congressman's Q4 2013 receipts into a greater perspective, consider this: the quarter also cracked Peterson's Top 5 list among the last 40 off-year quarters since 1995.

In fact, 2013 has actually been a banner year for Peterson, with the Democrat notching two of his five best off-year quarters dating back to at least the 1995 cycle.

The $164,981 Peterson raised in Q1 2013 was his fourth best all-time with the $164,634 raised in Q4 2013 just a few hundred dollars behind at #5.

Peterson's best off-year fundraising period during the last 10 cycles came in Q1 2007 with $229,784 followed by Q2 of 2009 with $192,691 and Q3 2007 at $166,856. (All periods during which he was the Agriculture Committee chair).

In other words, Representative Peterson was $2,223 shy of his third best off-year fundraising period across at least the last 10 cycles.

(Note: FEC filings prior to the 2003 cycle in off-years were compiled biannually, but Peterson's Q4 2013 quarterly receipts substantially top the biannual tallies from 1995, 1997, 1999, and 2001).

Collin Peterson's Top 5 Off-Year Fundraising Periods, 1995-2013

Rank
Year
Quarter
Amount
1
2007
Q1
$229,784
2
2009
Q2
$192,691
3
2007
Q3
$166,856
4
2013
Q1
$164,981
5
2013
Q4
$164,634
Table compiled by Smart Politics with FEC data.

Due to his historically large hauls in Q1 and Q4 of last year, Peterson is also on pace to have one of his best fundraising cycles ever.

The $527K raised by Peterson for his 2014 campaign through December is the third highest tally of his career at this stage, and just $6,270 off his second best tally.

Peterson's two strongest fundraising cycles came in 2007 and 2009 when he chaired the Agriculture Committee.

The congressman raised $673,428 in 2007 and $534,097 in 2009.

Peterson's average off-year receipts during the previous five cycles were just $420,902, making his 2013 tally 25.4 percent above the decade-long norm.

Collin Peterson's Off-Year Fundraising, 1995-2013

Year
Amount Raised
1995
$237,485
1997
$112,813
1999
$133,073
2001
$79,675
2003
$130,869
2005
$318,877
2007
$673,428
2009
$534,097
2011
$447,242
2013
$527,827
Table compiled by Smart Politics with FEC data.

In short, if Peterson ends up not running for reelection, the reason clearly will not be for a lack of money.

The congressman, of course could blunt speculation of his political demise (and end rumors of his retirement) by officially announcing he is running for reelection, but the latest word from the Peterson camp is he will decide by March.

While Democrats would undoubtedly be left in the lurch if Peterson opted against a run at such a late date (seven months before Election Day), the independent-minded Peterson may just be enjoying seeing the media spin in their tracks as they await his decision.

State Senator Torrey Westrom of Elbow Lake, meanwhile, is in no hurry for Peterson to confirm or deny these retirement rumors, as the congressman's possible candidacy in 2014 has probably helped keep the 7th CD GOP field entirely to himself thus far.

Westrom raised $84K last quarter after announcing his candidacy in early December.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Andrews Exits US House with Top 10 Longest Tenure in New Jersey History
Next post: The Vanishing Center: Exiting US Representatives

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

Political Crumbs

No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting