Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Democrats Flirting with Poorest Nevada Gubernatorial Showing Since the 1800s

Bookmark and Share

Will Democrats eclipse even the 20 percent mark in 2014 with an unknown nominee taking on a popular GOP incumbent?

briansandoval10.jpgReports out of Nevada Monday were grim for the Democratic Party - seeing their slim hopes of winning back the governor's seat for the first time in 20 years fade to black.

Clark County Commission Chairman Steve Sisolak passed up the chance to take on popular incumbent Republican Governor Brian Sandoval, thus leaving the party likely without a known candidate heading into the general election.

Nevada's filing period is March 3-14, but no major candidates have stepped into the gubernatorial arena to date to take on a governor whose state was carried by Barack Obama by 6.7 points in 2012.

Barring an 11th hour shake-up in the race, the Democratic Party could endure its worst cycle in a gubernatorial race in the Silver State in more than 110 years.

To date, the only candidates planning to file as Democrats are a political neophyte (casino industry worker Chris Hyepock) and an anthropology professor (Frederick Conquest).

Conquest previously ran for governor in 2010 and garnered only 14.7 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary won by Rory Reid. Conquest trailed "none of these candidates," which came in at 15.3 percent.

So just how low is the historical low water mark for Democratic gubernatorial candidates in Nevada?

Throughout Nevada's political history, Democrats have not suffered many blow-out losses in races for governor.

Across the 39 election cycles since statehood, only four Democratic nominees have failed to win 40 percent of the vote - and just two of 29 nominees since the 1900s.

By contrast, Republican gubernatorial nominees have not reached the 40 percent mark in 11 cycles since statehood, or in nearly 30 percent of all such races: 1894, 1898, 1906, 1914, 1934, 1938, 1942, 1962, 1974, 1986, and 1990.

Sandoval, who held the well-known candidate Rory Reid to 41.6 percent in 2010, will almost certainly hold his Democratic foe to much less than 40 percent this November. Even thirty percent might be optimistic.

The lowest levels of support for Democratic gubernatorial candidates occurred in 1894 (6.5 percent, Theodore Winters) and 1898 (20.6 percent, George Russell), although under unique political circumstances when the state was led by a third party.

During those contests, Silver Party nominees John Jones and Reinhold Sadler won plurality victories respectively in four-candidate fields that included Populist, Republican, and Democratic candidates.

The Silver Party would soon align itself with the Democrats and win the subsequent 1902 and 1906 gubernatorial contests with nominee John Sparks.

In the 20th Century, the weakest Democratic performances were turned in by Lieutenant Governor Robert Rose, who notched just 39.7 percent of the vote in 1978 against Republican Robert List, and State Senator Joe Neal, who won 22.0 percent in 1998 as incumbent Kenny Guinn cruised to a second term.

The seemingly inevitable blow-out that will take place in Nevada this fall will continue the state's reputation of serving up some of the least competitive gubernatorial races across the country in recent decades.

Although Nevada did have a close race in 2006 (with Jim Gibbons defeating Dina Titus by 4 points), the state has not offered up narrowly-decided gubernatorial races as a rule.

Over the last 10 election cycles, Nevada gubernatorial races have had the fourth largest victory margins in the nation at 24.3 points.

Only Utah, Delaware, and Louisiana rank lower on this blow-out scale.

In addition to whichever candidate emerges from the Democratic primary, Sandoval (who will receive token opposition in the Republican primary) will also likely face Independent American Party candidate David VanDerBeek on the general election ballot.

VanDerBeek, a marriage and family therapist who won 4.9 percent of the vote in the state's 2012 U.S. Senate contest won by Dean Heller, will run from Sandoval's right (VanDerBeek has previously called the governor "financial mafia" and President Obama a "fraud" - questioning the validity of his birth certificate).

The best showing of an Independent American candidate in a Nevada gubernatorial race is the 15.5 percent recorded by James Houston in the 1974 contest won by Mike O'Callaghan.

After winning eight of 10 Nevada gubernatorial races from 1958 to 1994, Democrats have lost four in a row ever since.

Republicans had previously never strung together even three consecutive victories prior to this run.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Do Losing Presidential Candidates "Step Aside?"
Next post: One and Done: The Unusual Exit of Gloria Negrete McLeod

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting