Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Cornyn Records Weakest Ever Primary Win for Texas GOP US Senator

Bookmark and Share

He may have cruised to a 40-point win, but the two-term Republican incumbent was still less than 10 points from a runoff while recording the worst ever primary performance by a Texas GOP Senator

johncornyn10.jpgU.S. Representative Steve Stockman's late decision to enter Texas' U.S. Senate race and challenge fellow Republican John Cornyn did not work out as planned Tuesday.

Stockman won only 19 percent of the vote with the well-financed, well-known Cornyn more than tripling his support at 59 percent.

One other candidate, Dwayne Stovall, notched 10.7 percent with five other candidates winning another 10.7 percent collectively.

While Cornyn's primary victory nearly assures him of another six-year term after the general election this November in the reliably red state of Texas, it is still worth noting that he set a low water mark for a GOP incumbent in the Lone Star State.

Overall, Texas Republican U.S. Senators have run for reelection 10 times during the direct vote era.

During six of these cycles, there was no primary opposition served up while these GOPers clinched their renomination bids: John Tower in 1966, 1972, and 1978, Phil Gramm in 1990, and Kay Bailey Hutchison in 2000 and 2006.

The remaining three cycles in which a Texas Republican U.S. Senator did face primary challengers were blowouts:

· One year after her special election victory in 1993, Hutchison won 84.3 percent of the vote in a seven-candidate primary field. No other candidate reached double-digits and Hutchison won by 78.1 points.

· Two years later, in 1996, Phil Gramm coasted to a 77.3-point primary win en route to a third term with 85.0 percent of the vote in a three-candidate field.

· Just six years ago, in 2008, Cornyn won by 63.0 points with 81.5 percent of the vote in a primary with just one opponent.

And so, Senator Cornyn is not only the first Republican incumbent not to reach the 60 percent mark, but is also the first not to win 70 percent and the first failing to win 80 percent.

In short, while the Tea Party did not score a victory in Texas' Senate race, they did fire another warning shot by exposing fairly tepid support for the establishment candidate as more than four in 10 voters cast their ballots against him.

It might be argued that Cornyn's support was bound to be weakened due to the fact that there were seven candidates running against him.

However, Hutchison faced nearly as many challengers in 1994 (six) and captured another 25 percent of the vote over Cornyn in 2014.

Even more importantly, it is the fact that Cornyn inspired seven other Texans to battle him for the nomination in the first instance that remains a cause for concern among the establishment in cycles going forward - particularly when they don't have the advantage of an incumbent to rally behind (e.g. 2012).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Ralph Hall Could Become Just 2nd Ever Texas GOP US Rep to Lose Nomination Bid
Next post: The Elusive Republican Majority

1 Comment


  • Rush,

    Texans sent Cornyn a message for all RINOS.......Cruz is doing what we expect both our senators to do when they get to D.C..

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting