Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


The Quotable Jim Sensenbrenner

Bookmark and Share

One of Capitol Hill's most outspoken critics of the mass data collection undertaken during the last two presidential administrations shares his thoughts on fear-mongering, Edward Snowden, and the long winter of 2014

jimsensenbrenner10.jpegOn Tuesday morning, 18-term Wisconsin U.S. Representative Jim Sensenbrenner gave a talk at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs to discuss privacy concerns and constitutional overreach over the last decade-plus stemming from the implementation of the Patriot Act and the subsequent lack of oversight on the intelligence community.

The Republican congressman introduced the USA FREEDOM Act in October 2013 to rein in this unchecked intelligence gathering to better protect the civil liberties of U.S. citizens by outlawing all types of bulk data collection.

The act also opens up the FISA court so that changes in policy are made public and would be subject to debate and potential amendment to the statute. A public advocate would also be appointed as part of the FISA court and appear before it and appeal decisions that the advocate deemed went beyond the facts and the law.

The legislation is sponsored on the Senate side by Democratic Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

Sensenbrenner talked for an hour about the ongoing political battle between privacy and security and did not mince words on his own views...

On those who would say security concerns are more important than privacy concerns:

"I get sick and tired of (people) saying that we shouldn't be concerned at all about privacy and civil liberties because that will end up being the precursor for somebody turning this country into a totalitarian state."

On what his fear-mongering critics claim will happen if Sensenbrenner's legislation is passed:

"If we pass your bill, the bombs bursting in air and the rocket's red glare are going to be going off repeatedly."

On Edward Snowden:

"I don't think he's a hero. I think he is a criminal. I don't think he's a traitor."

On the strange bedfellows of the Leahy-Sensenbrenner partnership:

"This is called plowing new fields."

On where Barack Obama comes down on security versus privacy concerns and the USA FREEDOM Act:

"The president does not really have a firm position on this and he's kind of gone back and forth...The White House still is somewhat in a quandary on exactly what to do."

Quoting Barack Obama's admission during a meeting at the White House with Sensenbrenner and the Patriot Act, all the while expanding it overreach on privacy:

"During the campaign my people and I gave you a lot of crap on this."

On whether members of Congress are well-informed on the rapid pace of technological change and the increased ability of government to gather and store large amounts of data to stay on top of the issue:

"Not really. Some of us are better informed than others."

On whether America is in the midst of a Constitutional crisis?

"If this continues, yes. If the law is amended, no...Sooner or later we are going to get to a Constitutional crisis and it will probably be one that is more severe than Watergate."

On who is to blame for the NSA overreach and current privacy concerns?

"All three branches failed to do oversight."

On what should happen to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper for lying to Congress:

"Clapper ought to be fired and he ought to be prosecuted. He's admitted he broke the law. How President Obama has allowed this man to be able to get away with committing a felony by his own admission and staying in his job, I don't know."

On the long winter of 2014:

"This winter's been the pitts."

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Which States Are Bellwethers for Partisan Control of the US Senate?
Next post: Will Montana Split Its Congressional Ballot Again in 2014?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Slam Dunk: Will 36 Record Presidential Winning Streaks Continue in 2016?

Three-dozen states are currently in the midst of their longest Democratic or Republican presidential winning streaks.

Political Crumbs

73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


Two Dakotas, One Voice?

For each of the last 24 presidential elections since 1920, North and South Dakota have voted in unison - casting their ballots for the same nominee. For 21 of these cycles (including each of the last 12 since 1968) Republicans carried the Dakotas with just three cycles going to the Democrats (1932, 1936, and 1964). This streak stands in contrast to the first few decades after statehood when North and South Dakota supported different nominees in four of the first seven cycles. North Dakota narrowly backed Populist James Weaver in 1892 while South Dakota voted for incumbent Republican Benjamin Harrison. In 1896, it was North Dakota backing GOPer William McKinley while South Dakota supported Democrat William Jennings Bryan by less than 200 votes. North Dakota voted Democratic in 1912 and 1916 supporting Woodrow Wilson while South Dakota cast its Electoral College votes for Progressive Teddy Roosevelt and Republican Charles Hughes respectively.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting