I had a hard time finding newsworthy press releases from government agencies, so I decided to compare the press release from the Norwegian Noble Committee announcing 2007's Noble Peace Prize winners and the New York Time's coverage of the story.
Right away in the second paragraph the news article uses the press release by stating in quotations the reason the committee chose the two parties for the award: The Norwegian Nobel Committee praised both “for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change.�
The reporters, after mentioning why the two parties split the award, showed various sides of the on-going issues of global warming such as Gore's award winning film An Inconvenient Truth, how the United Nation's panel was once vilified, and included a quote from a peace committee member, who usually don't comment on the award.
“I hope this will have an effect on the attitudes of Americans as well as people in other countries,� said Berge Furre, a peace committee member.
The reporter then chose to include more of the press release. In its formal citation, the Nobel committee called Mr. Gore “probably the single individual who has done most to create greater worldwide understanding of the measures that need to be adopted.� It praised the United Nations panel, which is made up of 2,000 scientists and is considered the world’s leading authority on climate change, for creating “an ever-broader informed consensus about the connection between human activities and global warming.� (New York Times)
The news article then focuses on how past award winners have bashed the Bush administration such as 2005 co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize Mohamed ElBaradei, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, made no secret of his opposition to the American invasion of Iraq and has angered the Bush administration by his measured methods for trying to rein in nuclear proliferation, particularly in Iran. But the article reminds us how the committee looks past the politics and to their achievements when selecting winners.
The reporters also chose to end the article with two very powerful parts of the Nobel press release.
In its citation on Friday, the Norwegian Nobel Committee said the United Nations panel and Mr. Gore had focused “on the processes and decisions that appear to be necessary to protect the world’s future climate, and thereby reduce the future threat to the security of mankind.�
It concluded, “Action is necessary now, before climate change moves beyond man’s control.�
In my opinion the reporters showed that they supported the argument of global warming by ending with the above quote that calls for man kind to act before it is too late to save earth. So one could argue that the reports did have a considerable bias when it came to reporting this story.