Light and Fab Labs
Well, one thing I notice that both the Khan article and the Gershenfeld articles is I don’t think I understand them. However, if, by some chance, I am interpreting at least part of them correctly, it seems to me both of them are describing using something small and/or basic to create a much more complex, impressive object. In the case of Gershenfeld, he is speaking of using some sort of (not quite) basic machine(s) to create something custom designed by the one consumer who will be using the product. They use their imagination to create the object in their mind’s eye, and they transform that image into a three dimensional object for their use.
Khan, on the other hand, is using something much more basic: light. He describes light in almost the same way Gershenfeld refers to the machines. Light is used to create spaces. Without light we would not have space. He is not talking so much about artificial light (which he claims takes away the character of a space. I completely agree with this theory.), but about the use of natural light. It is constantly creating new spaces even if technically the space has not structurally changed. It is like saying the same surgeon is capable of performing a multitude of different surgeries. The machines Gershenfeld speaks of are able to create (almost) anything, and light is capable of creating an innumerable amount of spaces.








