The Star Tribune (AP) covered the story Tuesday about police who shot the once famous chimpanzee after it attacked a friend of its owner, which has since had many follow-ups. The second follow story goes deeper into the story, attempting to further answer the "why" of the first.
The lead in the first story is,
"HARTFORD, Conn. - A highly trained 200-pound chimpanzee who once starred in TV commercials for Old Navy and Coca-Cola was shot dead by police after a violent rampage that left a friend of its owner badly mauled." (Star Tribune)
This lead explains first why this specific chimpanzee is news-worthy and then goes on to say what happened to it, by whom and who else was affected. The second lead, however, plays more with words and while the background information of its prominence remains, the information on what happened to it is deleted. However, the lead does introduce the topic of the article; so much background on his lifestyle to potentially answer the unresolved from the previous story.
"STAMFORD, Conn. - Travis the chimpanzee, a veteran of TV commercials, was the constant companion of a lonely Connecticut widow who fed him steak, lobster and ice cream. He could eat at the table, drink wine from a stemmed glass, use the toilet, and dress and bathe himself." (Star Tribune)
Although the second lead leaves the reader slightly less aware of what happened to this chimpanzee, both leads adequately address the novelty and quirkiness of the story.
The first story continues on with naming who specifically was involved: the chimpanzee, the owner and the friend it attacked. The article then goes on to explain how the attack happened, including details such as after the chimpanzee had escaped from the house, the owner had to stab her own pet several times in order to save her friend while they tried to get it back into the house. The evidence is then backed up with a quotation attributed by a police officer.
The report then naturally attempts to explain why this happened.
"There was no provocation that we know of. One thing that we're looking into is that we understand the chimpanzee has Lyme disease and has been ill from that, so maybe from the medications he was out of sorts. We really don't know," Conklin said.
It then wraps up with more details from the attack including what happened afterward and injury reports. The last of the inverted pyramid discusses police's previous involvement with this chimpanzee and more details on its fame.
The second story explains the novelty of the situation by comparing human-like characteristics the chimpanzee used to mimic with the animal-like vengeance that unexpectedly came out. There is a brief explanation of what happened during the attack. The focus is rather on the explanation. A primatologist is quoted, and then a few more details about the attack are provided, however, nothing new. On the other hand, new information about what the chimpanzee owner did following the attack was reported, including statements from a police call.
The story said possible reasons from the tea the chimpanzee drank that morning having Xanax in it to zoologist explanations of unpredictable behavior in chimpanzees.
The second story is a response to the first in that it further advances the news. The Start Tribune has since had a few articles as following stories from the first, all serving the role to provide more information about what happened as well as new information that has come.