3/7/12 - Environmental debate

| No Comments

Divorcing myself from opinions of this issue and looking primarily at the arguments presented by the two sides, I think that the debate for non-renewable energy had the most solid arguments. Bringing points up against the cost was a good point but generally heard, but the really solid point came from the idea that renewable energy cannot be the sole provider of energy. An issue of this magnitude can never be agreed upon 100% and therefore a gradual move toward renewable energy seems to be the appropriate policy. My vote is for the non-renewable energy side.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jared published on March 7, 2012 10:06 AM.

News Summary 3.7.12 was the previous entry in this blog.

St. Paul Saints ballpark is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.