SOPA Debate Winner

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

I thought that each side of this debate presented their points very well to an extent that makes picking a winner quite difficult. However, if I had to chose a winner I would say that the side against SOPA/ PIPA convinced me more. Their opening statement was presented in a way that appealed to logos quite effectively. Defining valid oversight and censorship made it clear that in this case the SOPA/PIPA bill was a form censorship and subsequently in violation with the first amendment. The group arguing for SOPA/PIPA made some excellent points, including the fact that this bill will indeed stop illegal piracy of intellectual information. However, they made a fact claim that if this piracy continues it will lead to creative genius as we know it to cease to exist, which I was not convinced of. Again, each group presented very well and came to the debate prepared but I was more convinced by the side against the SOPA/PIPA acts.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/180725

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ben Suker published on March 5, 2012 9:36 AM.

Debate winner... was the previous entry in this blog.

The Unfairness in Russian Election is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.