School of Public Health
 

Electronic Waste (PubH 6101)

Electronic Waste Home

Blog postings by The Environmental Health Impacts of Recycling

November 15, 2008

Environmental Health Hazards in Electronic Waste Disposal

Harms of Dumping Electronics in Landfills
By Kelly Baker

In addition to the deleterious effects of mining, the disposal of electronics is similarly hazardous. When electronics are disposed of, they are sent to a landfill or a recycling organization. When electronics are dumped in landfills without first being processed to remove harmful substances located in the electronics, these substances accumulate and can pollute our water and food system. Examples of hazardous substances found inside of electronics include: lead, cadmium , mercury , hexavalent chromium (Chromium VI) , and brominated flame retardants. The harmful effects of these substances include, but are not limited to:

Lead
- Damages central and peripheral nervous system
- Damages kidneys
- Damages brain development in children
- Accumulates in body over time

Cadmium
- Accumulates in body (and specifically kidneys) over time
- Classified toxin and carcinogen
- May cause irreversible health effects

Mercury
- Damages brain

Hexavalent Chromium
- Several toxic effects
- Asthmatic bronchitis
- possible DNA damage

Brominated Flame Retardant
- Possible endocrine disrupters
- Possible carcinogen

There is evidence that electronics have great potential to accumulate and adversely affect environmental health. It is estimated that 40% of the lead in landfills originates from electronics disposal. Further, another estimate shows that 22% of worldwide mercury consumption is due to its’ use in electronics.. Minnesota and other states have enacted legislation to eliminate dumping of electronics in landfills. It is important to note also is that the European Union has completely banned all disposal of electronics in their landfills.

RECYCLE ELECTRONICS!
Electronics should be recycled in order to prevent the harmful accumulation of these substances in our landfills. There are both ‘clean’ and appropriate methods to recycle electronics, and also ‘dirty’, or unsafe ways to recycle these substances.

CLEAN RECYCLING
An example the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition gives of a clean method of recycling electronics is practiced by Micro Metalics, which processes used HP Computers. This organization is located in the United States, the workers are unionized and are involved in the safety board of the organization. Further, the recycling system is mechanized, there is an Intranet where workers can research safety issues if they care to. Similarly, as the European Union has banned the disposal of electronic waste in landfills, and has similarly banned the exportation of this waste to other countries for processing , they should have similar ‘clean’ systems set up.

erecycling.jpg
(Photo source: "photo source: Treehugger.com)

DIRTY RECYCLING
Domestic ‘dirty’ recycling
According to the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition and The Computer TakeBack Campaign (2003) – American prisoners in the Atwater prison in California are employed for $.20 - $1.26/hour to recycle electronics. These workers work in poor, and dangerous conditions. For example, as prisoners are not allowed to work with heavy machinery, they must break the electronics apart by hand with hammers, which naturally leads to frequent lacerations and exposure to substances. Furthermore, these prisoners are not protected by the same environmental laws enjoyed by U.S. citizens, there is a lack of disclosure practices in these prisons, and workers do not have a strong voice to advocate for reform of this system. While there has been little to no study of prison workers’ health, it is known that the potential for exposure to hazardous substances is great. As an inmate at this prison who states, “Even when I wear the paper mask, I blow out black mucus from my nose everyday?

International ‘dirty’ recycling
The United States does export a significant amount of our electronics overseas for developing countries to process, as it is costly to cleanly recycle materials, and it is not unheard of for some developing nations to bypass environmental regulations for economic gain. Such countries where exportation is common include China, Taiwan, Nigeria, India, and Kenya.

Michael Zhao is a community activist who put together several short videos that documents both research completed by professors and graduate students at Shantou University, as well as also documenting work doen by the Computer TakeBack organization regarding electronic waste.

According to Zhao, the Shantou University specifically researched Guiyu city in China. This city is almost entirely based on recycling electronic waste, and workers do so in very dangerous conditions. Electronics are stripped apart by people’s bare hands, no safety equipment is used. People also heat up circuit boards and other machinery to better separate the materials, which releases toxic vapor into the air, and is inhaled by the workers and others. Professor Huo Xia of the College of Medicine in Shantou University states, “We found cases of hair loss, headache, and swollen and callous skin infections and skin damages after getting burned or corroded by chemicals…There are also cases of nausea, sore throats and other respiratory illness.?

Zheng Liangkai, a masters student at Shantou University sampled 149 children in 2004, ages 1-6. This sample showed that these children had 82% more than the Center for Disease Control threshold for lead poisoning. In a 2006 re-sample, the level of lead poisoning did drop to 70%, which while improving, is still a great threat to these children. Han Dai, a masters student also at Shantou University, found the IQ scores of children in Guiyu was far lower than the IQ levels of children in surrounding villages. These differences in IQ scores is attributed by the researchers to the high levels of lead these children have been exposed to through living in Guiyu. Similarly, Li Yan, a Masters student at Shantou University, tested the neural behavioral scores of babies in Guiyu and in the similar cities in the surrounding region. Again, the researchers found that Guiyu children had remarkably lower neural behavioral scores than the surrounding areas.

In all, it seems clear that while electronics need to be recycled to ensure that toxic substances do not end up in our landfills, we need to recycle these materials in a socially responsible way. It is clearly in our best interest to ensure that electronics are recycled cleanly, and that harmful substances are disposed of properly.

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(element)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexavalent_chromium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brominated_flame_retardant

Davis, Sheila and Ted Smith. “Corporate Strategies for Electronic Recycling: A Tale of Two Systems?. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition and the Computer TakeBack Campaign!

“Minnesota’s Electronics Recycling Act?. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Nov. 2008. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/oea/stewardship/electronics-law.cfm.

Zhao, Michael. “eDump?. http://michaelzhao.net/eDump/.