"Nutritionism"

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

Wednesday we watched an interview with Vandana Shiva and discussed the influence of industry in choosing what we eat. I find it so fascinating that the world (mainly the U.S) has evolved into one that eats mindlessly, without purpose. Generally, we eat based on emotion, desire, or due to lack of self control. While all these reasons are problems within themselves, an even bigger problem is what we are eating.In the following video, a major food and sustainability critic, Michael Pollan, brings up a few key points to how we should look at food and calls this viewpoint "Nutritionism." .
Firstly, I find it interesting how he, like Shiva, finds a very strong correlation between the food that we buy and how industry sells it. Before advertising was around, consumers never were focused on what additives food had to make it healthy. Instead, the food itself was already healthy. They did not need to be told that a certain product has "lots of fiber" or "Vitamin A." However, what I find to be the sad part is that the food industry is driven by what sells. Today, as Pollan claims, the things that sell are those that have been enhanced or processed. No longer can farmers strive off of a large crop yield or great farming season. Instead, they are dependent upon the amount of processing a food product goes through and then how well it is advertised. Consumers often do not want to think about what is healthy and, instead, buy what they are told is healthy.

This brings up his second main point of nutritionism. Consumers have fallen into the trap of advertising and fads. Fifty years ago the nation was not struggling with high cancer rates, obesity, diabetes, etc., nor were fad diets or crazed "nutrients" a popular topic. Simply, people ate what they grew. Pollan reflects on this to help us realize that this has worked in the past, so why are we straying so far from this way of life in the present? While Pollan points to advertising and industrialization, what do you think is the reason? Furthermore, is the term "organic food" a way that industries can earn money by making it sound healthier even though "organic food" is how food was always sold 50+ years ago, minus the name?

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/129783

1 Comment

The food industry has changed alot in recent years just like many other industries and fields. But what is interesting about the food industry is that it has not changed for the better and completely misses the point of why we eat. Like Pollan said, the point of eating is health but we have turned it into many other things. But the progress made in the food industry is about advertisement, cost, convenience, etc. What about health? Was any progress really made in the real reason we eat food?
I think we have strayed so far way from it because we are always trying to come up with newer and better things and in a way can never really except the fact that something is already good the way it originally was. I agree with Pollen, I think that advertisement and industrialization are the major reasons why we have strayed so far from this original way of doing things. I agree and do think that the term "organic food" is a way that industries can earn money. I think its not just about making money but also about bring us back to the way food was traditionally made and processed. The healthier way.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by 12345 published on October 31, 2010 5:54 PM.

Water and Vandana Shiva was the previous entry in this blog.

The ONION and Biodiversity is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en