Analysis: structure
The Star Tribune's story on Carlson School of Management's travel-abroad requirement is structured in a sensible order. They first state the most important fact--that all undergrads will be required to travel abroad before graduating.
The reasoning behind the decision immediately follows. And rightfully so, since the reader will automatically wonder why the Carlson administration decided on this.
Then, authoritative views are exposed--specifically a quote from the school's dean and information from university officials. This gives credibility to the news source and furthers the readers understanding.
Next, the story covers "how" the students can fulfill the requirement, elaborating on study/work abroad programs available.
The story, again, mentions why the requirement will prove to be useful and beneficial to students. Quotes are included from faculty member(s) and student(s) to add more substance to the story, as well as varying persepectives.
It seems as though the story is organized in the format of the inverted triangle--the least important information is included at the end, and the lead is very straight-forward and tells, basically, the most important of the information in the entire story. It is effective in that it is informative and relevant, but not too lengthy or wordy.