<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>GWSS 3307: Feminist Film Studies, Fall 2008</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2013:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496" title="GWSS 3307: Feminist Film Studies, Fall 2008" />
    <updated>2008-12-10T19:54:51Z</updated>
    <subtitle></subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.31-en</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Race, Class, Gender, Sexuality all approved!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/race_class_gender_sexuality_al.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159280" title="Race, Class, Gender, Sexuality all approved!" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159280</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-10T19:54:03Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-10T19:54:51Z</updated>
    
    <summary>What I find problematic with this statement is the notion that Race could be placed under the category of â€œsolved problemâ€?. It is always difficult to make connections to race and size in such rigid ways. Assuming that size is...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Nami</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>What I find problematic with this statement is the notion that Race could be placed under the category of â€œsolved problemâ€?. It is always difficult to make connections to race and size in such rigid ways. Assuming that size is the last â€œacceptable prejudiceâ€? puts race, class, gender, and sexuality in a vacuum in which our society has already overcome the damaging effects of the social creations of these identities. While some people might believe that we live in a post-race world, I strongly disagree that this society has arrived at such a point. Even though some might argue that racism is not de juro, it is obvious that there is still de facto racism. Race prejudice might be unacceptable in many social settings, in many other environments and spaces it still flourishes and lives. I do agree that there are strong intersections between race and size issues, I donâ€™t think we can fully conceptualize those by making such broad, and simplified statements. In both these types of oppressions we have larger powerful institutions that play a vital role in keeping these constructions alive. <br />
	I believe it is unfortunate that fatness creates this hypervisibility in our world that allows some people to believe the have the right to put judgment on something so personal. In the movie Shallow Hal, the relationship between the lead roles became completely public due to the size of Rose. In any other â€œnormalâ€? relationship it would have become a social faux pas to pass  judgment on a relationship in such a vicious manner. Until the end the relationship had to be constantly defended and explained by the kind, and warm hearted nature of the fat woman. Even though she is â€œrepulsiveâ€? I will be with her because I am a â€œgoodâ€? person, she has an exceptionally â€œgoodâ€? character. This message that was reified in this movie made sure that there wasnâ€™t any normalcy in this relationship. First it never complicated the fact that some outside force was asking for an explanation to be with somebody of a â€œabnormalâ€? size. This diverted from the fact that there donâ€™t have to special circumstances to fall in love with a fat woman. Second it created the image that only a very forward thinking, good hearted, and geniunly nice person could be in such an abnormal relationship. Third the fat love interest had to be a witty, intelligent, successful, and rich woman in order to overcome her size. At the end, being with her created an entry into a wealthy class bracket and culture of leisure and success. <br />
	I do agree that the oppression of size can be more blatant and accepted at times, I donâ€™t think it is the only prejudice that is still in use. A fat black, poor, lesbian, woman will have a very different experience than a white fat woman. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Fatness</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/fatness.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159230" title="Fatness" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159230</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-10T13:53:07Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-10T15:06:37Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Fatness is certainly not the last form of prejudice in our society, but it may be the most prevalent. This may be why Emme refers to it as &apos;acceptable&apos;, though acceptability is a subjective opinion. As to the panel selected...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ms. Chevious</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fatness is certainly not the last form of prejudice in our society, but it may be the most prevalent. This may be why Emme refers to it as 'acceptable', though acceptability is a subjective opinion. As to the panel selected by People magazine to discuss "Shallow Hal", there are some interesting discepancies. None of them seem to be a reasonable 'expert' on healthy body images in severly obese bodies. First, at 5'11' and 200 lbs., reportedly a size 14/16, Emme is on the lowest end of the obesity scale. She is a plus-size, and she surely knows how it feels to be made fun of for her size, but being a 16/18 myself, I know how much worse the prejudice is for women much larger than me. The other two women, Jennifer Holliday and Carnie Wilson, are not fat. They both underwent surgeries to not be fat anymore, which I deem is just as radical as extreme dieting or purging to lose fat or maintain a slim figure. Most women, regardless of their size, have internalized our society's expectations and ideals as to how our bodies should look. "Shallow Hal" just brings them into a wider discussion.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In regard to "Shallow Hal", I was appalled at the film's blatant mockery of fat women. No mention was made as to Hal's or Mauricio's fatness. There were no jokes at their expense based on their obesity. Every time an insult was made about Rosemary's fatness, Hal's repudiations weren't based on his acceptance of her size, but were made into jokes because of his ignorance as to how big she really was. The whole premise is how funny it is that he is in love with a fat woman but doesn't know it.<br />
It is sad how other people's fatness is often deemed okay for discussion. This is especially the case with women's fatness, and is at the root of the widespread reality of eating disorders, body-image issues, and related concerns of many women and girls in our society today. <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Prejudice</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/prejudice.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159198" title="Prejudice" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159198</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-10T00:17:31Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-10T00:31:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I think Emme&apos;s claim of fatness being the &quot;last acceptable prejudice&quot; is somewhat true. Some people are still racist but those people are looked at as totally ignorant. It is Not acceptable in be racist in our society anymore. Yet...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>marsh410</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think Emme's claim of fatness being the "last acceptable prejudice" is somewhat true.  Some people are still racist but those people are looked at as totally ignorant.  It is Not acceptable in be racist in our society anymore.  Yet it does seem somewhat acceptable to people to be prejudice against obesity.  Weil on supports this point in part because she's white.  Holliday however says nothing and probably doesn't think the statement is true because she is African American and also older.  She was an actress when African Americans were not that commonly seen in film.  She probably experiences racism or notices it while the other two don't because they're white.  Emme's statement is definitely problematic because I think a lot of people feel that they're made fun of or prejudiced against and it's looked at as acceptable.  Like people with psychiatric problems; while this isn't a physical trait pople still look at these people as 'crazy' and that's accepted.  People who are handicapped are also prejudiced against in some ways and movies and shows attack them to make people laugh like in South Park's "Special Olympics" episode.  I think it is completely unacceptable to judge anyone by their appearance or be prejudiced against a specific group or type of person.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>We can account for difference by recognizing it but not making fun of it or judging the characteristic that makes someone different.  I think we can add humor into it to a certain extent but when we don't promote positive self image of the person it makes it offensive and hurtful.  </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shallow Hal and Size Acceptance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_hal_and_size_acceptanc.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159127" title="Shallow Hal and Size Acceptance" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159127</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T18:13:13Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T18:13:34Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Emme used to be a plus-sized model and very prominent broadcast journalist for E! Entertainment news. I agree with her statement that far is the last bastion of acceptable prejudice to an extent. I believe it is because the degrading...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>J Kriegs</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Emme used to be a plus-sized model and very prominent broadcast journalist for E! Entertainment news.  I agree with her statement that far is the last bastion of acceptable prejudice to an extent.  I believe it is because the degrading stereotypes and language that surface from the prejudice come from the belief that being fat is a choice.  It is a similar type of discriminatory behavior that the gay community has experienced when society wrongfully accepts the belief that sexual preference is a choice.  The underlying problem in both fat and gay appreciation is the reluctance of our society to grant lifestyle choice to its citizenry.  The more freedom of choice the body politic is given, the less ability any institution (social, religious, political) is given to control individual behavior.  Therefore, less control means less power.  I think the particular issue of the marginalization of overweight people is troubled in our society because much of it is done not only under the guise of choice, but under the guise of choice for unhealthy behavior.  When bodily acceptance is intermingled with a health issue, it becomes easier for people to discriminate against someone whom they presume to be â€œchoosingâ€? an unhealthy lifestyle in the same way they would isolate a drug addict or a criminal for the â€œbettermentâ€? of society.  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Acceptance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/acceptance.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159212" title="Acceptance" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159212</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T17:52:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-10T04:57:38Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I believe that Emmeâ€™s claim of fatness being the â€œlast acceptable prejudiceâ€? is somewhat truthful, yet slightly inaccurate. Fatness certainly is an accepted prejudice, but the same people who make fun of/judge fat people are likely to be the same...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Bute0023</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I believe that Emmeâ€™s claim of fatness being the â€œlast acceptable prejudiceâ€? is somewhat truthful, yet slightly inaccurate. Fatness certainly is an accepted prejudice, but the same people who make fun of/judge fat people are likely to be the same people who use the word â€œretardedâ€? when referring to something stupid and are the same people who call others â€œfagsâ€? or â€œgirls.â€?</p>

<p>I think we have to examine the definition of <em>acceptance</em>. Not everyone appreciates fat jokes, just like not everyone finds racist remarks intolerable. Perhaps fatness is the MOST accepted prejudice, but it is definitely not the LAST.  While it is crucial that we examine the prejudice surrounding fat people, we canâ€™t forget about the other prejudices.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>I imagine that the reason why fat jokes and other negative connotations surrounding fatness are so â€œacceptedâ€? is because many people see fat people as being lazy, which is an attribute that (in the eyes of someone who isnâ€™t fat) could be seen as a personal choice; something that could easily be changed (whereas skin color cannot be changed). Iâ€™ve heard people say things like â€œhow could they do that to themselvesâ€? or â€œthatâ€™s disgusting.â€? Most of us dislike at least one part of our bodies, so itâ€™s possible that people make fun of othersâ€™ weight as a reflection on their own self-image. Like Emme says: â€œYou see other women look at a very thin woman and say nasty things. Maybe it's because our collective self-esteem isn't good. Why can't we support other women? We have to work on that.â€?</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Emme, Jennifer, Carnie and Shallow Hal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/emme_jennifer_carnie_and_shall.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159120" title="Emme, Jennifer, Carnie and Shallow Hal" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159120</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T17:47:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T17:50:44Z</updated>
    
    <summary>There are some interesting things said in the People Magazine article that had Jennifer Holliday, Carnie Wilson, and Emme discuss their thoughts about the movie Shallow Hall. Emme seems to try to pull out any positive aspects from the movie....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>AJ</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>There are some interesting things said in the People Magazine article that had Jennifer Holliday, Carnie Wilson, and Emme discuss their thoughts about the movie Shallow Hall.  Emme seems to try to pull out any positive aspects from the movie.  She is the only one that thinks any part of it is funny, and the only one that think there can be good that comes from it.  I think this is due to her successful career as a plus-sized model.  She has found a way to make money off her being a large woman.  The other two women, Jennifer and Carnie, have only experienced ridicule and teasing for their sizes.  The both of them have struggled to change their size and loose weight, because they are in the performance industry that is accepting of only thin people.  I think there is truth to Emmeâ€™s statement about fatness being the â€œlast acceptable prejudice.â€?  In our current society, it truly is no longer acceptable to be openly racist, sexist or homophobic, but people still do make fun of fat people.  I think this is because people donâ€™t take it seriously as oppression against a group of people.  I think many people understand fatness to be something that a person could change, if they tried hard enough, or wanted to.  But the reality is that being large is part of some peopleâ€™s identity, and that will not change. Not everyone is going to be thin, nor does everyone want to be.  It is dangerous to say that one oppressions is â€œthe lastâ€? one to be fought against, because of course, there are always more.  I think we can account for difference and oppression by understanding intersectionality.  All people have multiple identities, and this allows for more connections to each other than we can imagine.  Understanding intersectionality allows space for inclusion, connection, awareness, and equality through accepting difference and by not striving for sameness.  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shallow Hal and Prejudice</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_hal_and_prejudice.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159375" title="Shallow Hal and Prejudice" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159375</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T17:21:47Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-11T08:23:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I do consider Emmeâ€™s claim of fatness being â€œthe last acceptable prejudiceâ€? true to a point. In todayâ€™s culture people are so desensitized to the concept of obesity that it is socially acceptable to make fat jokes or a fat-phobic...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I do consider Emmeâ€™s claim of fatness being â€œthe last acceptable prejudiceâ€? true to a point. In todayâ€™s culture people are so desensitized to the concept of obesity that it is socially acceptable to make fat jokes or a fat-phobic comments. However, along with obese people, gays, lesbians, and those with handicaps (also made fun of in the film), and others still face desensitized prejudice and experience it every day. Most people associate â€˜fatâ€™ with â€˜unhealthyâ€™, and this is not always the case and people canâ€™t understand why. The problematic element of Emmeâ€™s comment is that she completely ignores prejudice against race, gender, class, and religion, though not purposely. Purposefulness aside, these prejudices are still â€˜acceptedâ€™ but are instead chalked up to ignorance or just not being â€œpcâ€?. Youâ€™d be hard pressed to find a black person who says that prejudice against blacks is over, or a woman who says that gender prejudice has been solved. I think itâ€™s interesting that Holliday did not speak to this point </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>even though they were interviewed together. Holliday, being a black and overweight woman, it seems would experience at least two kinds of â€˜acceptableâ€™ prejudice yet says nothing. Even Wilson said something about if being black were made fun of in the film, but Holliday remained silent.  We can account for difference and oppression by realizing that it is our false preconceptions as a culture and society that keep all marginalities down, and in order to accomplish the end of prejudice, marginalities must instead of pitting against one another, realize that they share the same goal. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shallow Hal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_hal_16.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159119" title="Shallow Hal" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159119</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T17:12:24Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T17:48:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The idea of beauty as one particular body type has been so deeply ingrained into our culture that often times we forget how prejudicial and marginalizing this can be. Yet people like the Farrelly brothers come along and make horribly...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>allora</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The idea of beauty as one particular body type has been so deeply ingrained into our culture that often times we forget how prejudicial and marginalizing this can be. Yet people like the Farrelly brothers come along and make horribly offensive films that remind us of this sad fact. Shallow Hal was simply one fat stereotype after another, and it seems hard to believe that anyone could see a positive message mixed in with the constant insults.  It was surprising to see that two out of the three women interviewed for the People Magazine article were victims of this system and went under the knife just to change their body in an attempt to conform to the ideal. Emme made some good points about making an effort to change perception, but I did not agree with her when she said that fatness was the "last acceptable prejudice". That statement, and Carnie's comment about how reactions would have been different if it inner beauty was portrayed as white, just seem to pit marginalized groups against each other, which gets us nowhere. Prejudices are just not something that can be compared. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shallow Messages: Sexism and Weight</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_messages_sexism_and_we.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159100" title="Shallow Messages: Sexism and Weight" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159100</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T16:57:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T16:59:28Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The problem I noticed most within Shallow Hal and one that is addressed in the People magazine article is the lack of pride that Rosemary is allowed to have in her body. The film is tremendously sexist- with men dictating...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>thur0139</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The problem I noticed most within Shallow Hal and one that is addressed in the People magazine article is the lack of pride that Rosemary is allowed to have in her body. The film is tremendously sexist- with men dictating the amount of confidence Rosemary can seemingly have in her body. In the magazine article, they ask if Rosemary â€œnot hiding her bodyâ€? meant the film had positive aspects. In addition to Hollidayâ€™s comments that all the shots of her body are â€œin the context of getting laughsâ€?, each scene in which Rosemary is scene wearing skimpy clothing where she exudes some level of confidence in her body is used as a punch-line. During the pool scene, when sheâ€™s wearing a bikini, a child ends up stuck in a tree because of her cannonball. When sheâ€™s wearing shorts with her parents her father chastises her and tells her to change into something more â€œappropriateâ€? for a woman of her size. All of these scenes, and many more, do not portray larger womanâ€™s bodies as a source of pride but rather a source of shame, due in large part to the reaction and prejudices of men. The film is horribly offensive and has a particularly ugly lense through which it views women, especially those who are large. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Beauty is difference!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/beauty_is_difference.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159104" title="Beauty is difference!" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159104</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T16:46:27Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T17:15:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Emme&apos;s claim that &quot;fat is the last acceptable prejudice&quot; is certainly a fair statement coming from someone who obviously knows. I don&apos;t disagree with the fact that she feels that way but I do however recognize that there are a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Revolutionary</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Emme's claim that "fat is the last acceptable prejudice" is certainly a fair statement coming from someone who obviously knows.  I don't disagree with the fact that she feels that way but I do however recognize that there are a lot of ways people can be prejudice and being prejudice against fat people is not acceptable by my standards!  Her point is well received but not well articulated because I think the point she is trying to make is about the ridiculous taboo set up around weight in this American culture that is indeed outstanding in comparison to other social taboo's.  Also important to note is the fact that prejudice messages are something people often internalize after so many years of hearing how (supposedly) other people feel about you.  People begin to hate themselves for what "they think" other people think when really they are the active agent in the "hate game" and people are way more receptive to difference than media makes them out to be.  Despite my understanding of internalizing prejudices and forming insecurities as a result, the culture we live in still portrayed the negative messages and is still ultimately responsible.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The way I re-imagine difference and oppression is by throwing out our capitalist system completely!  The reason weight is a taboo in America is becasue our capitalist, consuming culture is based on a campighn of fear and consumption.  In other words, the media of all sorts is desighned to play on peoples fears of unacceptace that we all have, and use them to sell you things.  </p>

<p>Example:  (Deep cheesy voice) "Do you have a few extra pounds around your waistline?  Try (insert ridiculous, non-creative product name here.) the wonderful new product that melts fat away!."</p>

<p>In order for this positioning of marginalities to be together and unified rather than placed as opponents of one another, we need people to start realizing the system we operate under in America is a fraud and doesn't serve anyone but the few powerful people at the top.(IE: corporations and government officials)  When people realize the injustice behind our entire materialistic lifestyle that is American culture, they might experience a personal revolution that allows for disregarding the entire foundation of all oppressions and isms that are still rampant in today's society.  </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shallow Hal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_hal_15.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159097" title="Shallow Hal" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159097</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T15:45:12Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T16:00:29Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The beginning of this article quotes, &quot;PEOPLE turned to three celebrities who have publicly battled weight issues&quot;. Already this article is leaning towards the idea that i fat person must battle their weight. I think that&apos;s an unfair assumption and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tina Fey</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The beginning of this article quotes, "PEOPLE turned to three celebrities who have publicly battled weight issues". Already this article is leaning towards the idea that i fat person must battle their weight. I think that's an unfair assumption and as Emme later points out that she is happy and content with her body size. It doesn't sound like she is battling. She goes on to say, " If we start saying, 'I want to be happy with myself and whatever shape I was given at birth,' I think it's going to change." I also found it interesting that they chose to interview two celebrities that had undergone stomach-reduction surgery. The was definitely a contrast between Emme and the other two women. Jennifer Holliday and Carnie Wilson are now considered thin after their surgeries. While it may have been what they wanted for themselves I don't believe that it's sending the right message. We shouldn't have to fix our bodies to fit inside of society's norms. Society should change to include everyone and stop grouping people and projecting a "norm". Wilson said, " The end message was good". I disagree with this. Hal said, "You're beautiful" but that is the onlly thing that is offered and right after he says that they pull the last joke when Rosemary gets in the car. Please. This is offensive. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Response to People Magazine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/response_to_people_magazine.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159088" title="Response to People Magazine" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159088</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T15:10:30Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T15:15:45Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The People Magazine article was very interesting to me because it shows the kind of dysmorphism we have culturally about weight. These are three women who have been particularly damaged by our culture&apos;s obsession with women because they are in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>allison</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The People Magazine article was very interesting to me because it shows the kind of dysmorphism we have culturally about weight. These are three women who have been particularly damaged by our culture's obsession with women because they are in the public eye. No doubt the very magazine who was interviewing them in the context of critiquing 'Shallow Hal' has run articles targeting their weight as an object of spectacle! </p>

<p>I think Emme is on the right track with her statement, but that it is quite problematic in other ways. I believe that fat is <i>one</I> of the last acceptable prejudices - something that is so codified into our culture, it leads nearly everyone to believe that health, body size/mass/weight and beauty are all inextricably linked, that bodies which are too large cannot possibly be considered beautiful. The fat positivity movement is still gaining visibility and momentum. For many people, it is hard to 'take it seriously' because it is interpreted as something people of size can <em>change</em> regardless of genetic makeup, economic class, and a million other factors - making it even harder to address. Emme's statement probably comes from the fact that we are conditioned to pit ourselves against other oppressed and marginalized groups to gain that visibility. (I could draw correlations here to the awful "Gay is the new black!" trend in the media since Obama winning the general election and Prop. 8 passing in California along with similar bills elsewhere...) To combat this, the marginalized must work together in solidarity, to draw commonalities between our experience, instead of driving in various wedges between groups.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shallow Hal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_hal_14.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159085" title="Shallow Hal" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159085</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T14:24:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T14:26:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary> I think Emmeâ€™s claim is unfortunately true. However, people who talk openly about fat in a derogatory sense know it is not okay, but they still do it because they know they can get away with it. The â€œfat...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>kerli006</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
I think Emmeâ€™s claim is unfortunately true.  However, people who talk openly about fat in a derogatory sense know it is not okay, but they still do it because they know they can get away with it.   The â€œfat jokesâ€? which circulate in our society are considered acceptable, because weight can fluctuate.  A fat person can become a thin person, unlike someone of color becoming white.  I think it would be a lot different if everyone was born into a specific body type, which physically could not change from its original state.  Then I donâ€™t think people would be as derogatory about fat appearances, because its permanent.  I do not mean to say race is not an issue, but it is at least recognized, now, as prejudice to make racist comments.  I found it interesting that Emme was so relaxed about the film, compared to the other two (which had both undergone gastric bypass surgery) who were deeply offended by the film.  Emme was not set on becoming â€œthinâ€?, but embracing her figure.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>She was obviously the most comfortable out of the three about her body image, and she is the heaviest of the women.  One of them was now unsatisfied with their extra skin from the drastic weight loss.  Emme expressed concern about the filmâ€™s intent, but she was able to make fun of the filmâ€™s awful attempt at changing perception of fat people.  </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Shallow Hal Wants a Gal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_hal_wants_a_gal.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159082" title="Shallow Hal Wants a Gal" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159082</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T14:01:41Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T14:03:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I think that because Emme is shown in a different light than everyone else she gets the brunt of many jokes. She is out there showing off her body by modeling clothes, so she knows that no matter how hard...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Abbie Weeks</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that because Emme is shown in a different light than everyone else she gets the brunt of many jokes. She is out there showing off her body by modeling clothes, so she knows that no matter how hard she tries, this is something that isnâ€™t going to change. Either you are big or you are small, and the industry that she is in, there is this idea of what a model should look like, skinny and beautiful. As hard as it is to say, society and Hollywood donâ€™t want to see a larger person walking down the runway, it is just unnatural, and how could a large person be beautiful. Also, for a singer you are not there to see how she looks you are there to see how well she sings, but there is still this idea of because you are on screen you have to look a certain way. Especially in Hollywood there is this idea of what beauty is and what it takes to look good on the camera; there are few women and men that have broken this mold but it still does not change peopleâ€™s ideas (although some have taken a different perspective to the idea of large). Personally, I think that no matter who says it and how they go about saying it there is always going </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>to be prejudice against larger people because there is an idea that if you are a certain weight at a certain height you could not be healthy, which is not true. Therefore no matter how many people say that being large is ok, there is society or Hollywood will make it a point to say that they are not healthy. Which in some cases is true, but there has to come a point where someone cannot change their whole life to fit the idea of perfect and the point of acceptance comes in. Acceptance will come from those who care about you and want to be by you, for the ones that do not accept how much you weigh then they wonâ€™t be around you. It is just like race, no matter how many laws are passed or how many movements there have been there are always going to be the people who still have prejudice against those who are different. Also, there are people out there who are shy about their bodies and want to hide them, obviously they are not going to speak out, however, this does not cause problems because the bottom line is you canâ€™t change everyone, just like how a large person should not have to change their bodies just because someone/Hollywood said so. Take Emmeâ€™s case for example, she broke the mode on what a model can look like and made a name for herself, but no matter how popular she gets or how good she gets at modeling, she will always fall under the category of a â€œplusâ€? size model and not just a model; some things cannot be change despite how much they should be changed. I donâ€™t think there is a way for accounting for differences and oppression just the simple fact that people will come to accept it or they wonâ€™t. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>SHALLOW HAL</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/2008/12/shallow_hal_13.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=8496/entry_id=159084" title="SHALLOW HAL" />
    <id>tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2008:/giust002/feministfilmfall08//8496.159084</id>
    
    <published>2008-12-09T13:57:46Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-09T14:15:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I really see truth in Emme&apos;s statement that fatness is the &quot;last acceptable prejudice.&quot; I think it&apos;s interesting that the other two women interviewed are not fat anymore. On some level, I think that Wilson and Holliday hold this prejudice...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Natalie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shallow Hal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/giust002/feministfilmfall08/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I really see truth in Emme's statement that fatness is the "last acceptable prejudice."  I think it's interesting that the other two women interviewed are not fat anymore.  On some level, I think that Wilson and Holliday hold this prejudice because they couldn't accept themselves as fat women.  From the very beginning of the interview, Holliday says she had a difficult time watching the fat Rosemary.  Wilson makes a great point that if this movie were about race and not weight, "it would be shocking."  <br />
When asked if anything in the movie made them laugh, Emme was the only one that said yes.  The fact that she was proud of her cannonballs as a kid shows that she wasn't ashamed of her size the way the other women are.  Emme has embraced her size and made a successful career for herself being who she is.  The other two women still have issues with their weight, even though they are thin.   </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

