Main

September 22, 2008

watching critically

When people watch a film, they already assume certain aspects of the characters or plot due to past experiences, media, and popular culture. They can also make predictions based on these assumptions. Mulvey says that the audience subconsciously identifies with the subject of the film. People take a passive role while watching films and let the main characters do all the thinking for them. They agree with that character and don’t actually watch the film critically. bell hooks says we need to be an “enlightened witness� when watching a film. We need to consider who made the film, the motive behind creating such a film, or shooting a specific scene in a specific way (ie framing & gazing), and what meaning the director was actually trying to convey. hooks says that we need to deconstruct the ideologies and mythologies of popular culture and clear our mind to critically analyze a film.


Continue reading "watching critically" »

September 16, 2008

Trina Hendrickson

I really enjoy bell hooks' views on misogyny and gangsta rap. I think it is really nice to find such a strong feminist that is willing to put her views and perspectives in such a different perspective and not communicate it as, she quotes herself, "feminist trash."
I agree with her that the misogynist and sexist ways of behaving and thinking that are portrayed in a majority of the rap videos and lyrics are reflections of ways that people of today's society think, feel, and behave.
In bell hooks article, "Misogyny, Gangsta Rap, and The Piano," she talks about an interview she conducted about a year ago with the popular Rap artist, Ice Cube. When they got together they sat down and respectively shared views and opinions on politics, values, and self determination amongst the Black race. It was thought that is bell hooks, an extreme feminist, got together with Ice Cube, a tough rap artist, that they would tear each other's throats out with harsh, bitter comments. I liked how this plan backfired. It just goes to show, that a person cannot judge another on how they may view issues, what they may value, or how they may act simply based on what kind of a person they are perceived to be.

Bell Hooks

I found the Bell Hooks documentary to be very enlightening. While I've taken other feminist classes as well as film classes she brought some new ideas to light for me. I thought the most interesting point, something I hadn't really thought of before, was the journalist she brought up who wrote the review on Spike Lee. It made me realize that those who do not watch films critically, and maybe some that do, often rely on reviews to help them decide how they feel about films. Often these reviews reflect the opinions of "typical" society. I think it's crucial to not only watch films critically but to also watch them without the bias of another's opinion. After watching this documentary I hope to never read another film review again- unless it's written by a feminist! I was also intrigued by her response to the O.J. Simpson case. I find her refusal to give people only what they want and her fight against the main stream very inspiring. To say that the murder of Nichole Simpson came domestic violence was probably the most profound statement I've heard about that case. I feel that in every thing that Bell Hooks says she is really getting to the core of the issue and making us think about what things really mean instead of what society thinks they should mean.

belle hooks and the Idle Viewer

In her film, “Cultural Criticism and Transformation,� belle hooks critiques not only the way we view popular culture, but what this system fosters, and how we play an integral role in the permeation of racism, sexism, etc. through the seemingly passive activity of media consumption. In illustrating her ideas, she uses examples from popular media, in both written word and the silver screen and then juxtaposes what was happening in the film—both on the surface and analytically—to what the audience saw, remembers. She also compares this difference to portray broader problems by showing the ways in which the creators (editors, directors) become enslaved to a system driven by money-making, and the item up for auction is the identity of classically disenfranchised groups.
In Mulvey’s article, she talks about the visual pleasure that is often erotic, and often derived from “the look� which in our terms is also known as the “gaze.� The object is female and the “looker� of is male. The fact that women are the object of the possessive male gaze for the purpose of providing visual pleasure means that women lack agency, or the power and choice as to whether they want to be possessed in this way. This is somewhat like a caging of the female identity, which is similar to the “framing� we discussed in lecture. The female on screen is consistently framed and imprisoned in windows, mirrors, etc. They are essentially trapped in the male gaze, and not at their own volition.
hooks harps on this idea of visual pleasure at the detriment of women and the African American community in her discussion of mainstream rap music videos in which the images of women are “fragmented� in a way that shows the viewer that these women are nothing more than their aesthetically pleasing parts. These women also commonly have lighter skin, and straighter, lighter hair. hooks points out that women with darker complexions are rarely featured in these videos. This also sends the message to viewers that Caucasian features in women are more sexually attractive, and therefore more valuable, as their sole identity as sexual objects is established.
The film changed my thinking a bit because I usually do not consider myself a party to these images that are projected in the media. However, as a consumer, I have mindlessly consumed racist and degrading material while, as a social activist, I have sat idly by and allowed my role in the continuation of this disgraceful cycle to go unnoticed.

Bell Hooks

Bell Hooks made me reaize that, when it comes to film-watching, I am completely oblivious.  I look back now and I can see all the racial profiling, gender discrimination, and stereotyping that took place in many of my favorite films. I will now watch movies with a more critical eye.  In the movie "Kids" it was greatly disturbing to see a girl get raped "gently".  Rape is never ok, and the fact that the director portrayed it as "gentle" thing makes me think he was trying to make it ok.  Also, I realize that race plays a big part in movie roles.  If the director doesn't cast people of all colors, shapes and sizes, he is seen as a racist or as fitting a steroetype.  The "bad guy" can't always be Black, but he can't always be White, Asian, Mexican, etc. either.  There are plenty of films that portray non-black criminals now days, so I'm not too concerned about films having a racist nature.

bell hooks

First of all, I like how bell hooks is never capitalized. I suspect that is done deliberately...
Anyways, the interview with bell hooks was incredibly enlightening. The term she uses, "White Supremacist,, Capitalist Patriarchy" sums up through which lens she believes one should analyze media. As consumers and target audiences, we often times take things at face value. We need to understand the deliberateness in which media is produced: by whom, for whom and why. Often times, media is produced to reinforce the White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchy which is the reality of our mainstream society. First is to be aware of this, to be "enlightened witnesses," then we need to dismantle it by critical analyzing. White Supremacy is a current state of our society and media that seems outdated, but hooks reminds us it is not, through examples of how blackness is used as a resource deployed by white people for their advantage.

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

White Supremacist Capatalist Patriarchy

Bell Hook uses this term in her film as a way of grouping all the "interlocking systems of domination." This allows movie watchers or music listeners to analyze issues of gender and racism, among other things under one term. Hook believes that racism is a term that "keeps white people at the center of the discussion" because it is a term that was developed by white people but can be directed in any way toward any group. On the other hand, she uses the term White Supremacy as a term to analyze racism that can "evoke a political world that we all frame ourselves in relationship to." It is interesting to look at films in this way because it doesn't just end with the two categories of white and other. It is almost like a spectrum that is easily noticed now that it has been brought to my attention. Even when it comes to black characters in movies or music videos the darker the skin of the character the more likely they are to play a delinquent or degrating role. In most cases it can be summed up as the lighter your skin is the better person you are and the darker your skin the worse you are.

Continue reading "White Supremacist Capatalist Patriarchy" »

Feed the Fire

Bell Hooks had a heck of a lot to say about watching films with a critical, feminist eye! Not only was she completely clear and concise in her analysis of the media and movies that were addressed but she let no injustice go without saying. The techniques she employed in bringing out the multiple "isms" (racism, sexism, chauvinism, etc.) were not so mechanistic to be easily described but more of an abstract, feminist lens through which she viewed not only films but the world. The terms capitalism and white supremacy were two terms she used in her discussion of the what she believed to be the root causes of the "isms" within the films. She is addressing the big picture issues by using these terms and not poking around at the "symptoms" of the larger problems that are taking place within our society. Capitalism is the driving force of our economy and to make the money one has to cater to the people in power,..hence white supremacy. In other words, in order to make money in the move industry one must work within the discourses already set up. Her quote " there isn't any money on the left" says it all.

Continue reading "Feed the Fire" »

Bell Hooks

Bell Hooks' film teaches us how to watch films critically because she guides us through the steps she takes when analyzing films. She breaks it down into manageable pieces. For starters, she mentions that film-makers make conscious decisions to portray and/or exploit individuals in certain ways, whether we realize it or not (most people, I think, are not aware of how much thought goes in to the film-making process and the meanings behind every little part of films).

Hooks discusses the framing of men versus women, as well as the roles men are given versus the roles women are given. Women are typically portrayed as sex objects. Their main purpose in films is not to be strong, main characters, but to be somewhat in the background; almost like a filler. Even if women are the "main characters," Hooks mentions that in Kids (I believe) people remembered the names of the two star male characters in the film, but could not remember the names of the two star female characters. In class, we talked about the male gaze/watched the YouTube clip on it; we saw that women are often zoomed in on and looked at from a distance, portraying this idea that women are to be looked at from afar and are "hard to get."

Hooks also looks at violence; sexual and physical. Male dominance is a huge issue for Hooks. Movies and music videos show male dominance in nearly every script, some more obvious than others. How often do we see female dominance? If we do see it, the men are perceived as being whipped or non-masculine. Maybe their should be more equality displayed between men and women; although that probably wouldn't make for good flicks.

The one concept Hooks uses regularly throughout the film is White Supremacy. One specific example stands out to me; she mentioned that filmmakers can portray black people/black culture without even including black actors on screen. What does that tell us? It's hard for me, as a white person, to notice things like this because of the white privilege that I have.

Hooks' film has definitely influenced the ways in which I will watch films from now on. I am able to analyze the roles that characters are given in a way that I have never thought of before. I think this was a good way to start thinking about feminism in films as well.

Bell Hooks

After watching the Bell Hooks film "Cultural Criticism and Transformation" I felt like I hadn't notcied a lot of the ways filmmakers try to force their ideas and perspectives onto the viewer of the film. In the movie "Kids" I thought the rape scene was really disturbing because it was almost as if the director tried to make the rape ok because of the way the boy was saying nice things to the girl while it was happening, not that she could hear him anyway, and trying to make it look like he wasn't forcing himself on her, but he was. It is scary to think of a young boy watching this film and then think it is ok to do something like this because it was portrayed in a way that didn't look like rape, when in fact it was. I think that after watching this film in the future I will notice more the ways the filmmakers try to portray different kinds of people in the manner they believe is the right way, when really it is just their opinion on how that person should be. For example, in the film "Smoke" I thought it was interesting how the character of the black boy wasn't written specifically for a black character but the personality of the character caused the director to pick a black person because the director thought that is who would represent that character better. But why did a black person have to play that character? It wasn't necessary, it was just the way the director viewed the character, which then forced anyone who watched that film to view that character as black.

Bell Hooks Pop Culture

Bell Hooks film Cultural Criticism and Transformation teaches us that you need to watch films as an enlightened witness. Being an enlightened witness means becoming critically vigilant about the world we live in. In the section Motivated Representation Bell Hooks talks about the movie Smoke. In the movie the theft is an African American boy yet the script never asks for an African American actor. Bell Hooks asks the director of the film Smoke why he chose to cast an African American boy and he couldn’t answer her. The director without knowing it reproduces certain kinds of racial stereotypes. We as the audience have to be conscious of racial, gender and other profiling in pop culture. Bell Hooks also mentions that film making isn’t about magical thinking, imagination or creativity, its about people consciously knowing what kinds of images make an impact. Which means they only pick an African American as the theft because they know it’ll make an impact. Key terms Hooks mentions are White Supremacy, Capitalist, and Patriarchy. They refer to an institutional structure, not individual beliefs. Bell Hooks said that if she just looks through the critical lenses of gender or race you’ll miss the bigger picture when looking at pop culture but if you use these key terms you will see the bigger picture. Bell Hooks’s film has made me think when I watch a film how is each person being portrayed and how each situation is being handled. One topic that she talked about that struck with me is when she is talking about the rape scene in the film Kids. The movie Kids said that there would be a brutal rape and to be advised when watching. Bell Hooks points out that if you were not able to see the rape and you were only able to hear what was happening you would think that it was just two people making love not a brutal rape. I would of never thought that before she pointed it out. I mean I know that was rape when watching the movie but that was because she told us before the scene was played. If someone were just shown that clip of the rape they wouldn’t know it was rape. This fact was an eye opener for me because of how this could be so differently perceived. Bell Hooks pointed out to us that no one wanted to talk about the feminist movement; there has been a great back last against feminist being played out in movies. Back around WW II when women bad to work in the factories mass media was used to get them back into the kitchen and now mass media is trying to get women out of feminist ways of thinking and back into patriarchy way of thinking. I never thought about this happening in pop culture and knowing this has really opened up my eyes.

bell hooks

I felt that the most moving part of this movie was bell hooks' title argument, on the idea of critical thinking and transformation. That the ability to view media and the the world in away that you become an “enlightened witness� and through this enlightenment can change their own lives more so than could monetary gain or social capital. Her theory of the White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchy summed up the state of our society better than did the previous terminology of racism, sexism and classism. Our social structure has been set up in a way that reinforce stereotypes of violent hyper masculinity and over-sexualized femininity, that in turn reinforces the power structure mainly that which keeps old rich WASP men on top. She argues this through the discussion of both womens framing and objectification in film as well as showing us how media glorifies/celebrates male sexual violence and violence in general. Also in her talk of Spike Lee and Madonna she demonstrates how the system can work for and against pop culture icons. Madonna considered a feminist by graphically and publically displaying her sexuality and Spike Lee being reviewed as a failure, because his movies didn't make sense to white viewers...but ultimately just because he is black. Her talk definitely helped me to rethink film and to view it more critically by seeing these underlying concepts for what they are, namely a framework for societies structural of oppression of the Other.

Enlightened Witness

Bell Hooks approaches the topic of popular culture with a voice that is not commonly heard within pop culture, the voice of an African American woman. Hooks presents the audience with the proposition of “thinking critically� when viewing the images and ideas that we as a society are spoon fed through cinema, television, and other media sources. Foremost she examines symbolisms of our white supremacist, capitalist patriarchy, asking viewers to become “Enlightened witnesses, and to be critically vigilant.� Hooks urges the audience to not just accept pop culture ideas and images, but to deconstruct and analyze them.

How are women and people of color most often displayed? Simply put, women equal subjugated sex objects, and minorities are generally generalized as stereotypes. As a viewer it is complicated to accept these ideas as projections of fiction, rather than examples of live truths. These exploitations of oppressed people further society’s negative attitudes and actions; imprinting visions of age old sexism and white supremacy. Hooks explores the condition to which the male P.O.V can objectify a female’s body instantly. Furthermore she examines the OJ Simpson trail, pulling forward the evidence of how white vs. black was used to cover up the real issue of domestic male violence. She continues to also explore the chronology of Madonna’s career; from a groundbreaking feminist artist, to an old woman who sold her body to capitalism.

As a beginning feminist filmmaker, I believe I have in many ways been doing my best to view films critically, and to write screenplays with strong female lead characters. However, Bell Hooks was able to present new ideas of “cover-ups.� Such as the OJ trial, what is behind the circus that’s not getting the attention it deserves? I am now thinking about discovering deeper points that are often obstructed by lavish distractions, or even masked by other societal issues. Also I have been reminded of the capitalist control over the images and ideas that are introduced to audiences daily.

bell hooks

I have read bell hooks' philosophy before and I must say its nice to finally be able to put a face to the name. I tend to agree with her ideas on cultural criticism. We must be conscious of the power that pop culture has in creating systems of oppression. I found the OJ trial part interesting, as I had never really thought about how race was used as a smokescreen for the patriarchy surrounding that ordeal. I loved the idea of "mock feminism" in films like Waiting to Exhale. Movies like that one show how important it is to be able to see through patriarchal rhetoric in order to become what hooks refers to as an "enlightened witness". I can't have a blog about hooks without mentioning "white supremacist capitalist patriarchy", since that seems to be one of her favorite phrases, but I think it emphasizes the need to focus on the interconnectivity of all parts of identity, not just race or gender. I can't help but wonder: would it be possible to include a word like hetero-sexist or homophobic to that long string of words?
hooks has really challenged me to think more critically about pop culture. I'll never watch a film the same way again.

bell hooks and watching movies critically

bell hooks’ film “Cultural Criticism and Transformation teaches us to watch films critically by asking us to question the things that we take for granted about popular culture and blockbuster films. hooks wants us to consider who the movie is made by and for, where the funding comes from, what the filmmaker expects us to believe about themselves, and decode the underlying messages of sexism, racism, class, and heterosexism (to name a few) that support the authority of the white supremacist capitalist patriarchy (WSCP). She asks us to become “agents of change� and understand that film culture has a certain agenda to follow, and begs us to rethink our interpretation of rap music, cinema, and mass media by interpreting popular icons such as OJ Simpson, Madonna, the film Braveheart, Spike Lee, etc, by understanding how gender, race, privilege, and class play into popular culture.
hooks’ film has caused me to consider future film watching differently because I believe in her work which states that media and film reinforces the WSCP. Although I have not watched any films since we watched hooks in class,

Continue reading "bell hooks and watching movies critically" »

White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchy

One can see that Bell Hooks is an intellectual and a scholar that is devoted to critical consciousness and awarness of oneself and society. In her lecture she has focused on the interconnectivity of race, class, and gender and their ability o produce and perpetuate systems of opression and domination. She clearly emphasises that topics can not be dealt with sepereatly but have to be understood as being interconnected.
In her video on Cultural Criticism and Transformation, bell asks why we should study popular culture, and answers by arguing that we need to resist representations - not be free of them, but to be critically vigilant regarding them. Because popular culture has great power in our everyday lives, she suggests that the process of critiquing popular culture is the site of pedagogy and learning, and it is a way of strengthening our students' sense of agency.Early on in the movie she explains the importance of the freedom found from the mass based literacy movement. This show us that the first step to thinking critically is decolonizing our mind which then allows us to find our own voice. Through this process people can resist the reinscribed ideas of Race, class, and gender and move towards becoming an "enlightened witness".
Hooks showed the complex nature of being truly critical, and with that she has opened a path for starting an honest conversation on sensitive subjects. I loved when she talked about "American cultures obsession with transgression and change". While many believe that society has made great progress with the state of constant respect for the "other" by mantaining a system of "P.C" (political correct), it is because of this notion that we fail to start a genuine and honest dialouge about the real issues that are presented. Hooks explains this by stating that the "Postmodern theory, that is not seeking to simply appropriate the experience of "otherness" in order to enhance it's discourse or to be radically chic should not seperate the "politics of difference" from the politics of racism."
As a black, muslim, female immigrant I am aware that the cure for oppression is not going to come from the oppressor, it is with movies such as the Hooks lecture that I can find tools and strategies to overcome the fear of becoming a part of an institutional construct of the White Supremacist, Capitalist Patriarchy.

White Supremacist

bell hooks

In the film “Cultural Criticism and Transformation,� bell hooks tells us to think critically. She wants us to become “enlightened witnesses� by being critically attentive to the world we live in. The media of popular culture is deeply visual and people with money and power can produce whatever images they want. hooks stresses the importance of questioning who produced and directed a film as part of examining its contents critically. Being a sociology major, I was particularly interested in much of her discussion about popular culture. It was interesting to me when she pointed out how Hollywood movies can suddenly make issues important. Her example was with the movie Braveheart, but there are many other examples. I was also very interested in her ideas about a sense of entitlement that some students feel as opposed to others. She said that when she taught at Yale, students had a sense of entitlement and more of a sense of imagination about the possibilities for their futures.

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

bell hooks and Creating Images

Thinking critically about films is a relatively recent idea. Not until the 1960s did people truly sit down and start thinking about what exactly it was that the films they were watching were telling them. As bell hooks points out in her “Cultural Criticism and Transformation,� “popular culture is…where the learning is,� and pop culture is made up primarily of movies, music, and the celebrities of the decade.

In her 1975 article, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,� Laura Mulvey discusses scopophilia, the love of looking. She discusses how women are put on display in movies for men’s pleasure through the use of close-ups, slow motion shots, fragmentation of women’s bodies, and the a literal framing of women. She discusses how the male and female characters are viewed in the film

Continue reading "bell hooks and Creating Images" »

bell hooks

In her lecture “Cultural Criticism and Transformation� bell hooks offered a host of strategies for viewing films critically. She wants the viewer to consider: Who made the film? Who is the money behind the film? Who is the intended consumer of the film? Who is the film about and how are the characters portrayed in the film? More often than not in today’s mainstream movie machine, the answers to these questions can be found within what she refers to as the “white supremacist, capitalist, patriarchy� (ws, c, p). As she pointed out, these are “interlocking systems of domination� that are all working in tandem to keep themselves in place. And she cautioned that simply looking at one aspect (race, gender, etc) on its own doesn’t give us any real insight because the representations offered via the mass media are always more complex. I think that falling into this trap is rather easy because often there is one issue that seems more prominent than others might seem.

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

Bell Hooks

I definitely got more out of the Bell Hooks video then I ever thought I would have. After you gave the class a short synopsis on what we were about to watch, I basically just expected a good little 20/20 type show talking about feminism in film and popular culture. Instead I got that and more. I was able to hear an incredibly smart and gifted woman voice her opinions on everything from gangster rap and Madonna to the OJ Simpson trial and thinking critically when watching films. Now while I didn't agree with everything she had to say, that doesn't mean I didn't enjoy or get anything out of the video because I did. I just watched the video again for the second time and I was able to get into and like it even more this time around. After watching it twice and being able to think about it for a bit I feel like I have a pretty strong grasp on what Hooks was trying to say.

Continue reading "Bell Hooks" »

September 15, 2008

bell hooks & the Challenge to Become an Enlightened Witness

In bell hooks' short film “Cultural Criticism and Transformation�, she makes use of several different methods engage a number of critical feminist viewpoints, aiding her in the unpacking of several major cultural phenomenon. hooks encourages us to look and think critically about film, rap music, and other representations of gender, race, sexuality and class in mass media. hooks makes the argument that popular culture is at the crux of the transmission of cultural knowledge; according to her, this is where the learning and socialization of most people takes place. Referring to the nature of pop culture as 'intertextual', hooks illuminates the correlations between how we are expected to perform our sexuality and the violence that effectively keeps some groups subjugated in our societies.

Continue reading "bell hooks & the Challenge to Become an Enlightened Witness" »

Cultural Criticism and Transformation

In the film, " Cultural Criticism and Transformation" Hook's opened my eyes to a whole new level of critical thought in film. When the film first began I was surprised to see the reoccurring topic of race being brought up, as the class is Feminist Film Studies, not Race Film Studies. However I thought it was so powerful the way that Hook's showed that race and sex function together at the same level through the term White Supremacist. In film if we can look at the different ways that races are being used and represented and use that to open the door to a new understanding of how woman are portrayed in films. Hooks encourages us to take a deeper look into film. She was spot on when she said that no one wants to admit to consciously constructing stereotypes in film. Knowing this, we have to then take a closer look into these films, in order to get the TRUE message. After doing so you find yourself asking questions that will further your knowledge of the world around you. Film can be the road map that leads to changes in our world. By watching and critiquing film we can take away messages and lessons that would otherwise be ignored.

Bell Hooks

I have little experience with viewing films critically, so I thought Bell Hooks’s interview to be very motivating. She stated that anyone is capable of thinking critically about film. Having an opinion and considering what you are viewing is important. By not responding to a film, intellectually, one is almost giving in to the Hollywood nonsense that is out of control in our society. Hooks emphasized that when critiquing or analyzing a film, one should recognize gender, race, social status etc…simultaneously. This opens the viewer‘s analysis to the whole picture, not just singling out one issue. For example, usually the issues of race and status go hand-in-hand in the movie world. Hooks expressed the power of film in pop culture. Pop culture plays a huge role in the way people learn and interpret society. It was stated that the media has control over our imaginations. That is an unsettling thought for me. Another strategy for analyzing film, was to pay attention to stereotypes.

Continue reading "Bell Hooks" »

bell hooks

Bell Hooks attributed much of the sexism in films, to the people who are producing the films. In the reading by Laura Mulvey, Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, Mulvey touches on a theory of Freud's that said, scopophilia is part of ones sexuality, that gazing is natural. The relation between the two, is if men are producing most of the films seen though out the population, wouldn't it be natural for them to focus on what Freud pondered to be the basic human instinct of attraction? And because the majority of the producers are wealthy, white, and male, they keep producing one sided views of sexuality. Is it just a vicious cycle then? Then, I am curious to know if these male produced films are mostly created on fantasy, compared to the real thoughts, feelings, and actions of women?

bell hooks

When we watched “Cultural Criticism and Transformation� in class, I was prepared for a film that highlighted the things that were wrong in popular culture and the things that need change. What I wasn’t prepared for was how well bell hooks was at articulating the things I have often only vaguely felt about these issues. Hooks’ film doesn’t simply make a few points about the flaws in today’s media culture; it challenges the audience to become more aware of the issues that pass in front of our eyes everyday on screen. She challenges us to become “enlightened witnesses� or people who not only see but also question and analyze what it is that we are taking in. Hooks’ point about “color coding� was really interesting because she spoke about the different levels of acceptance based on the lightness of skin, i.e. a woman of color with darker skin is less likely to play in a leading role. I found this especially interesting because when I look back to many of the films I have seen, there are very few exceptions to this rule.

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

bell hooks

Bell hook’s raised many points that have helped me to start viewing films critically. One point raised is to look not only at the actors and actresses and what story they are portraying but to look at the creators, the one’s who are behind the message that you are seeing. Her idea of being critical is all about being an active audience, compared to the passive audience. Bell hook’s mentions how the U.S is so deeply visual but often has a very one dimensional identity. One must actively look for stereotypes, who’s behind the production (usually white men), and be conscience of manipulations within the films, music, art, etc. She stresses the point that to have transformation, in the case of women as well as minorities becoming equal, one must be literate and be able to think critically. I agree with this statement completely. Without ever questioning what we see and who has the power behind the various creations we as a society will never advance forward and will continually have the same people in power. This in bell hook’s terms is an “enlightened witness�, one who is able to look at the bigger picture within a piece of art.

Big Picture

In her film, "Cultural Criticism and Transformation" bell hooks addresses and analyzes representations of different cultures, colors, and sexes in film and popular culture. This has been done before by many academics, however, hooks puts it in an entirely new perspective by naming the root of the issue: white supremacist capitalist patriarchy. By discussing the background and meaning of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, hooks teaches us to try and find the bigger picture so that we may put things in perspective. This can mean asking questions like, who wrote and directed a certain film - was it a man or a woman? black or white? straight or gay?, or why do some rappers use extreme violence and sex in their music - who is their audience? The example of misogyny and violence in gansta rap is one that is constantly discussed. hooks explains in her essay, Sexism and Misogyny: Who Takes the Rap?, "The sexist, misogynist, patriarchal ways of thinking and behaving that are glorified in gangsta rap are a reflection of the prevailing values in our society, values created and sustained by white supremacist capitalist patriarchy." She makes an important point: that a "critique must always be contextualized." I think that this statement applies to films and pop culture as well as gangsta rap.

bell hooks

bell hooks has spent her career studying and teaching both women’s studies and cultural studies. In the documentary “Cultural Criticism and Transformation� she presents her own insight of the depiction of race, gender and social class in media outlets such as music and film. She also teaches her audience how to watch films and listen to music critically and to analyze what they observe while also realizing the affect which this media is creating in our world. In film today, movies such as Basic Instinct and Kids, girls and women are used more as objects to look at than as actual characters/people. Through techniques such as the male gaze, it is the director and/or writers who are responsible for doing this. Male gaze, when used as a guy looking at a woman, supports some societal beliefs of to-be-looked-at-ness in regards to women, supporting the idea that they are just objects to be looked at. This is also accomplished when the woman in the scene is being focused on in a way that makes her seem more attractive such as gradually scanning her body form the feet up or focusing only on specific body part such as her butt.

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

bell hook

I think that bell hook did a very well job in explaining feminism, and creating a better understanding of it for me. Personally I don't have much of a backround in feminist studies. I also come from a family backround which is very traditional with a male dominated culture. After watching the film and listening to bell hook explain that feminism is not just about women wanting to be a dominating figure like many male figures in our society today but rather being equals to their male counterparts. Furthermore I like how she adds that it is about equality not just at work but as well as in the home and all aspects of life. I think that after watching her film it will help me greatly in my understanding of the course and feminism in general.
However there were a few aspects of the film that I found to be bias or slightly of the subject for feminism. That is that there was a great deal of attention given to minority women. I feel that minorities, particularily female minorities, are not fairly represented, but their voices are just as important as anyone else who has something to be heard. I do not disagree with what she was saying but rather that she should have focused on more of the womens role, both in film and in daily life, and not so much on defining the female character as black or white.

bell hooks

Popular culture is all around us and it has shaped our views and our opinions or certain races, ages and genders. Bell hooks does an incredible job of giving us countless examples of how this is happening in our culture. She talks about how Darth Vader has the distinct "bad guy" voice and how countless movies show the bad guy with the dark appearance and the creepy voice. The voice we associate with the "bad guy" is the directors creation. The director decides how the characters sound, look, their age and sometimes their gender. Most of those things are not written into a script they are the directors interpretation of how the story is supposed to be. We should be watching films with this type of mindset but the majority of people see the story that is presented to them. They see a black character as the thief or the white middle-aged woman as the victim. I personally don't look at the white supremacy in films unless there is blatant racism in the film. I just see the characters as they are but since watching bell describe the many aspects of popular culture that i have never looked at, it makes me open my eyes and I think the next time I watch a new film or even a film i have seen countless times, I will look at it differently.

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

bell hooks

In her film, "Cultural Criticism and Transformation," bell hooks teaches us new ways to watch films. She encourages viewers to take a more active role as audience members. She stresses the importance of analyzing film, television, music and current events. She criticizes directors and filmmakers for being patriarchal, capitalist and white supremacists. She definitely embraces the intersectionality tenet of Women of Color Feminism. The majority of the film is spent addressing racial issues, rather than those dealing specifically with gender inequality, and she points out that the feminist movement is not just about sex.
It was interesting to hear her interpretation of the "color caste system." I have heard about this before, almost a racism within a race, and she pointed out its prevalence among rap videos. bell hooks is obviously a very powerful and respected woman, and it was so refreshing to hear her ask the tough questions that many are afraid to ask. When she asked the director of Smoke why he chose to make the thief black, she was calling him out on his stereotypical action. No one wants to admit to consciously reinforcing those racial stereotypes. I thoroughly enjoyed hearing hooks' opinions of popular culture, because being a black woman she has a different perspective on things than, for example, a white person may have. I liked how she pointed out the power of popular culture in our lives today, because I think this impact is often overlooked. We are constantly bombarded by images and messages from the media, and it is so important to take a closer look at what is being communicated.
This film has definitely altered the way I will assess media in the future. I will pay more attention to the underlying messages that filmmakers are sending, rather than assuming a passive and accepting role as a viewer. I will challenge and criticize images and ideas that are being presented in the media.

Bell Hooks - The Enlightened Witness

In "Cultural Criticism and Transformation", Bell Hooks taught about being an enlightened witness. This lesson proved basic yet essential when watching films critically. This same idea applies to music, as well as culture and every day life. She also mentioned the importance of critical thinking and literacy in order to develop the enlightened eye. Reading about our history as well as current events is a strategy Hooks spoke about. She combines these ideas with the knowledge of key terminology providing a strong base for critically analyzing popular culture and films. Hooks talked about the institutional construct that is made up of capitalism, patriarchy, and the white supremacist. She also focused on the portrayal of women in movies showing clips from Leaving Las Vegas, Kids and others. While viewing these clips, she points out the framing of women, slow motion, and close-ups that are often used to reinforce the "to-be-looked-at-ness" of females in film. In the reading, "Intro: Woman as not Born but Becomes Woman", McCabe writes about the female types in film consisting of the glamour goddess, femme fatale,

Continue reading "Bell Hooks - The Enlightened Witness" »

There are many ways in which Bell Hooks’ film “Cultural Criticism & Transformation� has taught me to watch films critically. Hooks, has shown through her analysis of the documentary film Hoop Dreams that all is not what it seems. One of the young men in Hoop Dreams decides to focus on his education and family instead of basketball, but instead of praising him for this choice he is shown as a failure. I have seen Hoop Dreams two or three times and I see now that her analysis of this film is accurate. Whereas, before I even viewed him as somewhat of a failure. I thought here this young man throws away a great opportunity to play basketball and not only that but he also has a baby, what a waste. Another great example that is used is the film KIDS. I have seen this movie as well and I did consider it to be a radical film. However Hooks, feels that it offers a very conservative right wing view on gender, race and HIV. She also feels s that KIDS reproduces a lot of stereotypes through transgressive sexuality.

Continue reading "" »

Bell Hooks

"The issue is not freeing ourselves from representations. It's really about being enlightened witnesses when we watch representations." -bell hooks
I think that Bell Hooks' film teaches us how to watch films critically by using history as a back bone and what actually happened or occuring at a point in time shows in films. She breaks her movie up into two parts. In the first part she lays out the theoretical foundations of her work, emphasizing that film imagery and media representations are purposly made to portray messages that support the authority of "powerful" white males, degrading women and people of color. In part two, she uses concrete examples how to recongnize the "white supremecist", patriarchal values shown in popular media. She emphasizes that we need to learn how to identify somewhat hidden messages about race, gender, class in popular media. Her examples come from the O.J. Simpson trial, Madonna who she has quoted saying that black men are rude and inconciderate but yet she still uses them in her videos because they look good.

Continue reading "Bell Hooks" »

September 14, 2008

bell hooks


In “Cultural Criticism and Transformation,� bell hooks demonstrates how important is to think critically about the media we are taking in. This means being an enlightened witness, by vigilantly paying attention to what we’re being told and how we’re responding to it. She points out how powerful pop culture is in its ability to affect people and also how useful it is in helping us grasp concepts of feminist criticism. I thought the film did a great job of giving example after example of the things you notice when you take the time to think critically. I think we often take for granted what hooks calls motivated representation, and that there are “conscious manipulations taking place� in the media we consume. We like to assume the best of filmmakers and don’t always realize that they ultimately have the power to shape our thinking in this way. A good example of this was when hooks talked about constructed narrative in Hoop Dreams. I think it’s really important to realize that even in a documentary, things can be manipulated to send the

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

bell hooks

From watching one video on bell hooks I can now view her as one of the most accessible public intellectuals I've ever heard speak. When doing some research about her I found a quote by her stating " The issue is not freeing ourselves from representions. It's really about being enlightened witnesses when we watch representations." And watching her video "Cultural Criticism and Transformation," she taught me just last. She teaches us to
watch films critically by thinking critically, being open minded, look at all perspectives and looking out for stereotypes, something as small as violence and the roles people are playing. An example is watching the role of a women in a film. Watch the angles of the camera and what they are focusing on for the majority of the time when i female is on set, something a lot of people don't even think twice about. The biggest thing i learned from bell hooks is to watch things critically and not how society wants us to view it. The strategies she uses to employ in order to analyze was having first focused on the foundations and positions of her work and then moving towards the value of cultural studies in concrete analysis through showing clips of films and videos and then discusses and argue about the certain issue. She used the word "enlightened witness" a lot, which is referred to as becoming critically vigilant about the world we live in. This can be achieved through critical thinking and greater literacy, not censorship. After watching this video I feel like my goal in life should being able to consider myself a enlightened witness and be able to think crucially about most situations and I will start trying but know i will never come as close to bell hook when it comes to her analyzing and critical thinking.

Cultural Criticism-Bell Hooks

Bell Hooks really inspired me while watching this movie. It was amazing how intellectually stimulating all of her various criticisms were. She made me think about movies in a whole new way. Hooks has really inspired me to watch films more critically and think about all of the criticisms she mentions in this movie by using the various themes and concepts we have learned thus far. Bell Hooks makes a compelling argument for the trans formative power of cultural criticism.

Hooks discusses the theoretical foundations and positions that inform her work. Hooks also explains why she insists on using the phrase "white supremacist capitalist patriarchy" to describe the connecting systems of domination that define our reality. One term that helps explain this domination would be, scopophilia, visual pleasure through looking; the audience as viewing through the main male character of a film, the male gaze. She showed numerous examples of how women are objectified through looking by these dominate white males. Some examples of how this is done would include: close-ups, slow motion shots, fragmentation of body parts, and literal framing of the women’s body.

Continue reading "Cultural Criticism-Bell Hooks" »

Bell Hooks and Pop Culture

After watching Bell Hooks’ interview, I was unable to think about anything else for the next 48 hours. She discussed a lot of the issues that I had thought of, but not to the extent of scrutiny that she had. Her analytical way of thinking blew me away in awe. I understood that the mass media played an important role in the everyday life of America, but I didn’t really consider how “the mass media is being used to get the women out of feminism and back into some patriarchal mode of thinking� (Hooks). And she is correct. Hooks uses some interesting strategies to watch films critically. She talks about how women are framed just right or how black women are “color coded� to appeal to the white supremist consumer. Hooks also uses some key theories and terms to analyze pop culture. Those terms are as follows:

Continue reading "Bell Hooks and Pop Culture" »

Thinking Critically of the Media

“Cultural Criticism and Transformation� shows many ways to watch films critically. Hooks outlines many different aspects of films, such as the way women are portrayed, violence, and different stereotypes that are portrayed in movies, which need to be thought critically of. Films can be taken apart to get a closer look at the characters- their race, gender, age- this can help the viewer to understand certain stereotypes that exist in our society. An example of this is when hooks explains that a movie, which is based on a book, the thief is changed from a white male in the book to an African American male in the movie. She speculates that in our society it is often more believable for an African American teenager to be a thief. Intersectionality is a term hooks uses that could explain this idea. An African American, adolescent male has different stereotypes than those possessed by a white, adolescent male. There are so many forms of oppression that coincide with each person’s many identities, that it is easy to overlook some of the stereotypes.

Continue reading "Thinking Critically of the Media" »

bell hooks

bell hooks, like many film viewers coming from a perspective different from the "standard" white male perspective, teaches us to be more aware of the different lenses we can use to evaluate a film from. She herself is a black female, and thereby is able to see films/tv shows/music from both a black and a female perspective. Even if we are not necessairly black or female or gay or whatever, bell hooks' film makes it clear that trying to adopt such a perspective allows the viewer to understand the film in a many-layered way. The viewer must break from what Mulvey called the "male gaze" (that is, the straight white male gaze) and see the piece in a different way. One of the key steps to breaking away is understanding what hooks refers to as "white supremacist capitalist patriarchy" as being the overriding viewpoint in our society. hooks' film has definitely made me more aware of the different elements that come into play when approaching a piece of popular culture as well as how other people might view the very same thing.

Continue reading "bell hooks" »

Bell Hooks

hooks is a very wise and insightful woman, and has a lot of important and fascinating things to say. Her movie, Cultural Criticism and Transformation exposes racist and anti-feminist messages woven into popular culture. Her opinions are supported by excerpts from music videos, feature films, and television news coverage. The OJ Simpson trial, Spike Lee, and "Hoop Dreams" all come up for analysis. She also takes on the movie Kids, rap, Hollywood's appropriation of "blackness," and the media representation of the black female body. The film has two main focuses. The first focus laid out the foundations of her work, arguing that film imagery and media representations are deliberately crafted to convey messages that reinforce the authority of powerful white males at the expense of women and people of color. The second focus demonstrates how to recognize the "white supremacist, capitalist patriarchal values" reflected in popular media and public debate. hook reveals how black politics, feminist politics, and critical thinking can help you see what you didnt even notice was in front of you.

the Cause and Effect

bell hooks not only encourages society to watch films critically, but to take our analysis and insight gained and use it to recognize our daily encounters with “"white supremacist capitalist patriarchy." bell hooks stresses that the images of women on screen—whether they be degrading, violent, or stereotypical—are more than just an image to be immediately consumed, and thereafter forgotten. Rather, she urges all of society to recognize the many causes and consequent effects of these depictions.

For example, I have always strongly disapproved of the modern day rap video. The “subservient sex slave� female idolizing the “male rap god� as he runs off lyrics, which demean women and establish them as an object that belongs to him and serves only to achieve whatever sexual or violent fantasy he creates. The cause for this always seemed self-evident: male superiority. Yet, this image, as disturbing as it is in and of itself, requires so much more interpretation if we are to fully comprehend our societal tendencies in popular culture. bell hooks points to the white CEOs and presidents of the record label companies which produce and control this; in addition, one must consider the young suburban, white male population that demands and subsequently supports this type of industry. As well as the music video producers, who almost force-feed viewers the image that the “light� African American female is preferable. So by looking at the larger social constructs as bell’s insists, one recognizes that in a rap video it is not just a the portrayal of patriarchy, but also the power of capitalism and deeply engrained racist ideals that lead the numerous negative effects (such as increased violence against black women).

The effects of “white supremacist capitalist patriarchy� can also be seen in the popular roles given to women in film: the femme fatale or the objectified sexual object to name a few. I could go on and on listing examples of women being literally “framed� in these roles as seen through the “male gaze� of the male protagonist. Yet, the problem isn’t that this exists, but that we are unaware neither of its existence nor of its effects upon us. For example, women feel the need to become these characters, which supposedly are a reflection of what women in society ought to be. Men subconsciously come to expect these impossible standards of women in real life. Creating two forms of impossible expectation. Another example, is the frequent casting of black men in the roles of violent villains—even when a script does not specify the race of the character, the director knows a black villain will sell best. We cannot continue to see movies as merely entertainment when it is so evident that the repeated representations of women and people of color in such demeaning roles is having significant effect upon society.

As my eyes were opened to the repercussions caused by these portrayals in current and past film and society, I immediately wanted to know what has been or can be done to erase this. I was deeply interested in bell hooks response. She believes it is through books, not movies, that we will begin to repair the situation. To achieve freedom and justice in our society we need more “mass literacy.� In her view, it is only with critical thinking and literacy that we will achieve a true transformation. This surprised me at first, but it makes absolute sense the more I ponder it. Movies are so dictated by the white men of Hollywood and the social pressure to provide what sells, that true avant-guard films will never provide the permanent solution to the unfortunate status quo. It is only through the readings of intuitive and informed thinkers like bell hooks that society will begin to first acknowledge and then erase the terribly flawed perceptions and attitudes it currently holds of all races and genders.

Thinking Critically

Bell Hook, in her documentary Cultural Criticism and Transformation, emphasizes people to think critically about what they watch in popular cinema by becoming an "Enlightened witness." Hook says that the power of representation through film is a major force in how we as people may think about various subjects. Thus, it is necessary that we view films by thinking about the ideas they represent by considering who made the film, what was the motive behind it, and what is the film REALLY trying to say? She gives the example of the film Braveheart. By watching this film, audience members may put the liberation struggle of Ireland on their social maps when never before did they consider this social issue. Hook also suggests that since it was a white male as the main character, the audience may feel that this may give the film credibility. This idea of a white male in power as natural and good is because of a White Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchy says Hook. White supremacist male dominated ideas are perpetuated due to a system rather than just attitudes and behaviors evoked by a certain number of people.

Continue reading "Thinking Critically" »

Kids and Leaving Las Vegas

Bell hooks’ film "Cultural Criticism and Transformation" teaches us how to watch films critically in a number of ways. She employs the strategy of thinking critically about representation on film and avoiding the temptation to think that a film is just entertainment or art and doesn't mean anything. In the film "Kids� she critiques the scene where the kids beat the black man to death and notes that Larry Clark intentionally used a dark-skinned man in order to play on the antipathy of the audiences. She also looks at what types of people produce the images we see in film. For example, only privileged, wealthy people are able to produce a major Hollywood film and their personal and political ideas, both latent and manifest, are projected through the film. Bell hooks encourages viewers to watch films while consciously thinking about how ideas of patriarchy, conscious manipulation, white supremacy and capitalism play into the image that we see.

Continue reading "Kids and Leaving Las Vegas" »

September 13, 2008

Bell Hooks

Hook's is a truly remarkable woman. She knows and understands how the
media portrays people among race, class and gender. She taught me how to
look at how people are portrayed within movies or shows. For example, when
a black man was hired instead of a white man to play the role of a thief or
bad guy. When asking the director why he chose a black man he didn't have a
straight answer. This is why media is shaped by us and the way people
establish it. Some strategies and key theories she employs include that you
need to look at media knowing that you have already been brainwashed before
by stereotypical thoughts. The main thing I learned from Hook is to look and
evaluate everything. How the woman is looked at up and down, in a frame
square. How people of color are played as bad or stereotypical low class
people. How men are looking at woman. These all make more sense to me know
that she put this in clear view. I guess I never knew that most of the
media industry is controlled by white men. White men usually have the same
point of view on theories like these. She hints that the white man is the
reason behind the race, gender and class scrutiny in films, images, and
songs.

This has made me think more critically about the movies I watch. I found it
interesting that the male gaze is used so inappropriately. Mulvey explains
the male gaze as a world ordered by sexual imbalance. A traditional
exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with
their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so they can get
this to-be-looked-at-ness. I agree with her, men stereotyped us to be a
piece of meat. Like in the rap videos, they are hardly wearing nothing and
dancing around the man like he is a god. I have learned that it is who is
behind the camera that makes decisions how how people are portrayed. Before
Hook's I was not looking understanding that women are portrayed as sex
objects, white male dominant, people of color are played as usually bad and
lower class because I am brainwashed by how society is. She wants people to
understand and watch things how they interpret it, not how the media wants
us to.

a bit too long entry on bell hooks

Popular culture, as opposed to elitism of academic analysis, offers rich and accessible field for interpretation of various representations and images. Popular culture allows to analyze images and ideas in terms of difference and otherness, such as race, class, and gender.
bell hooks does not suggest that there is a simple and direct correlation between representations and social reality, but calls to be attentive how certain images and ideas might normalize certain unacceptable behaviors and actions, such as violence against women or racism. Hollywood or media in general, has an enormous power “to alter people’s perceptions.� For example film “Braveheart� caused enormous sympathies and deep emotions with colonized people, but bell hooks calls attention to who is represented (white European male) and why and how these representations instead of challenging reproduce white male privilege.

Continue reading "a bit too long entry on bell hooks" »

How to formulate the Question

Bell hooks begins “Cultural Criticism and Transformation� with a declaration of the ability and necessity of thinking critically. Because popular culture is the most dominant and widely accessed stage for the exchange and enshrining of cultural ideas and images, it becomes a necessity to deconstruct the ideologies popular culture produces. Hooks concretely examines how representations of race, class and gender operate onscreen (read productions of racism, sexism, classism). More importantly, however, she explains how intentional the motives are behind these representations, and the impact they thus enjoy in popular culture. As Ann Kaplan explains in her introduction we must ask “how meanings about women are produced on film as these relates to meanings about women produced elsewhere i.e. socially, politically, and culturally in different national contexts�. One could substitute in place of women: Blacks, Latinos, Queers, persons with disabilities...etc. hooks and McCabe both touch on the influence and power of feminism but also the brutal backlash against feminism which is perhaps most clearly shown in women's representations in film (bell hooks looks at “Leaving Las Vegas� and McCabe takes up Haskell's text From Reverence to Rape)


hooks touches on two major terms "white supremacist capitalist patriarchy" to describe the intersectionality systems of oppression and the idea of the enlightened witness- as someone who engages with popular culture with an eye towards criticism. There was a moment, which could be categorized as a second wave/third wave clash in film which emphasized for me the need to think critically even about the perspective of bell hooks. At one point as hooks is taking about the rape scene in the film Kids and says something to effect that at one point this film would not have been accepted and people would have protested but now with the “domestication of sado-masochism and acceptance of sexualized violence.... the film made the rape seem sexy or cool. The indictment of SM (consenting adults who participate in domestic SM) seems totally irrelevant to the way rape was shown in film at the 1990's progressed. Why hooks felt that community deserved the finger of judgment as opposed to other forces (feminist backlash, patriarchy, etc) seems deserving of questioning. What I took from the film for watching future films was hooks ability to constantly question and constantly find the ways in which issue intersect. Also the importance of identifying the true questions popular culture raises which are not always on the surface. For instance with hip-hop for many is seen as a perfect example of how patriarchal and misogynistic images of women are produced, but in fact the first questions that must be raised is about capitalism's influence over product and industry.

September 12, 2008

bell hooks discussion

I found bell hooks to be really interesting, and I think that she is an incredibly intelligent woman. I feel like she was never really bias, and that she truly thought of things from a much deeper level than most people. I liked how she would talk about something and than there would be a clip along with it that would give us a visual example. After listening to her talk and than watching the clip everything she said was so blatantly true. For example, she discussed how the African American male’s body was sexualized, and than there was the clip from the movie “kids� (which by the way looks like one of the worst movies ever), where there were close-ups of the shirtless young African American boys. It was done in a similar fashion as the way women are filmed with the close-ups of their faces and body parts. The person viewing this scene is totally bombarded with images of the body rather than images that have to do with the story.

I found a lot of what she said in her film to be really true, and often quite disturbing. Her ideas about the portrayal of race were really enlightening to me. I guess when I have watched films with an all African American cast I never thought about how the directors, producers and all the other people behind the scenes were white and probably mostly male. I have watched movies like “Waiting to Exhale,� and I thought that this was a film from an African American female filmmaker’s perspective. Now I know that I can’t just assume that just because the entire cast is African American the movie represents real African American people’s views and lives. Obviously everyone is different, no matter what color their skin is, but I just found this whole discussion really interesting. One can see how maybe the glass ceiling works when bell talked about Spike Lee and his career. It was an interesting point she made about his work being criticized in the press all the time, when he is the most successful African America filmmaker. Another interesting point made was how the African American Woman’s body is displayed in rap videos and films. The woman is usually very thin, light skinned and has straight, silky hair. I thought about it, and I couldn’t think of many famous African American women in the media with dark skin and curly hair. These are things that most people don’t even think about. African American women are completely objectified in rap videos.

I was still a little confused about her term “white supremacist capitalist patriarchy.� I looked at the posting on the blog of glossary terms and that helped (thanks). This term totally makes sense, and I think it’s true. Everything in our media is completely controlled by white men. In the film, they showed all the record labels that have rap artists signed to them. All these labels, and production companies are run by the white male. However, the rappers often play into these roles because they get so much money for it. In the end, money is what matters most. It’s so disturbing to think about how our entire culture is largely created by rich, wealthy men. Not only do they control our government, but our pop culture and media too. I agree with bell hooks in that today, the movies have a huge, direct influence in our culture. It was interesting when she talked about how white, suburban boys who may not even know any African Americans watch rap videos and get this idea of what an African American woman and man are like. They might start dressing like a rapper and listening to rap music and think they know everything about African American culture.

Continue reading "bell hooks discussion" »

watch watch watch watch watch watch watch watch

What I learned from the film is that in order to think critically when looking at media a person must realize that their perception has already been twisted from all past experiences of media, consciously examine the details of the work, and then evaluate how their own assumptions relate to the work itself. In Mulvey’s essay she presents the idea that the audience of a film subconciously identifies with the subject of the film, and therefore their attitudes toward the film will be biased if they choose to examine it critically. Two of bell hooks analytical strategies in regards to film include the understanding that all forms of oppression intertwined, and the concept that media is always created by human beings. Her examination of the Simpson case reflected these two strategies in that she pointed out that the mainstream media’s exlusive focus on racism was dismissive of the central issue of domestic abuse, and that both forms of subjugation required simultaneous analysis in order to inform the case.

Continue reading "watch watch watch watch watch watch watch watch" »

September 11, 2008

Min's Blog

After watching Hook's movie the biggest element that stood out for me about watching movies critically is knowing everything that is going on screen and how things are being represented. What I mean by that is, there are certain things that we have been trained to understand by movies, music, television, and other mediums to almost assume certain stereotypes. We are trained to automatically understand that blacks are dangerous, that women are sexual objects to men, that white people are middle class, upper class, or maybe nerdy. And because we are trained to understand "roles" this way, a movie with a robbery does not work as well if an African-American is not the person committing the robbery. I think Hook is trying to let us know that these could be forms of racism and sexism but we are passive when we see them in movies because we are so used to it. By brining this issue of being able to think critically about movies into the open, we can now begin to look at things not as popular culture wants us to view it, but rather we can engage in our viewings and see items from a different perspective. She does not want us to be empty, helpless shells absorbing images and messages, but human beings that are able to choose and filter what we

Continue reading "Min's Blog" »