Behaviorism: "Animal Man" Makes Baby Cry

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

Would you be enticed to believe that your consciousness plays virtually no part in your actions, or that the process behind your decision-making is really no different than that of animals? If not, behaviorism might not explain your preferred theory of psychology. Behaviorism entails a branch of psychology comprised of the notion that virtually all behavior is through conditioning.

Behaviorism has its roots in Russian psychologist Ivan Pavlov's research on stimuli regarding dogs' salivary glands. This paved the way for psychologist John B. Watson to assert that our behaviors can essentially be reduced to a pattern of stimuli and responses; everything is the result of conditioning. Watson is perhaps best known for his "Little Albert experiment," by which he conditioned an eight-month-old child to cry upon viewing a white rat by striking a hammer against a steel bar upon the rat's appearance. Many have taken issue with the ethical questions of such an experiment, but Watson was always known as a radical, even earning the nickname "the animal man" for his comparison of animal behaviors to humans.

Pavlov 2.png

Other significant contributors to the behavioral field include E.L. Thorndike, who primarily studied the way animals escape from cages, and B.F. Skinner, an extremely influential psychologist for his idea of reinforcement as it relates to sustaining certain stimuli.

Generally, behaviorists are determinists; they believe that actions are predictably the result of past environmental experiences. While most would like to believe they have more control over their actions, one should think about the comic posted below. After all, I know I would stop robbing banks if someone promised me ice cream in return.

Comic chicken.png

5 Comments

| Leave a comment

After reading your entry and from my personal experiences I am actually inclined to agree that many actions are a result of conditioned response, which eventually turn into unconscious behaviors. For example, we know that touching a flame will hurt us because in the past every time we touch a flame, our hand gets burned and therefore we are conditioned to know that the fire will burn our hand. This leads us in the future to without thinking withdraw our hand from a flame, whether it be a real or fake one at first because of what we have experienced in the past.

Your entry does an awesome job explaining conditioning while incorporating some humor as well. The cartoon and picture were a nice touch as well. Do you feel like there is anything that has happened in your past that has caused you to have a certain reaction to any event?

I think you do a great job explaining behaviorism and use good images to help visually convey this topic. In addition to the images, the examples you describe add even more to your explanation. I find it very interesting that we can be conditioned to respond positively or negatively to just about any stimulus. It would be interesting to find out about any current studies being done using this technique.

I really enjoyed your entry, you did a very nice job of explaining behaviorism! It is somewhat humbling to assert that our decision-making process is exactly like an animals.

I agree that many of our actions could be do to a previously conditioned stimulus because some form of stimuli precedes every action we make. Although this is a pretty solid argument, if we observe a behavior and learn from that (observational learning) then is the action you take really do to a conditioned stimulus or is it a previously learned action coming from procedural memory?

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by stel0161 published on February 26, 2012 9:32 PM.

Be aware of your surroundings was the previous entry in this blog.

Advertising: The Hidden Psychological Manipulator is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.