Correlation versus Causation: Social Networking and Personal Confidence

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

It seems like everyone is on Facebook these days, so when browsing through articles to write about, I was drawn to one addressing how social media affects friendships. The article addressed how these sites influence teens, and as I continued its claims seemed to strongly equate correlation and causation. It spoke of how online sites give shy people a voice, because it lacks the possibly anxiety-inducing experience of speaking face to face and making eye contact. It stated that quiet personalities find their voice online, promoting a feeling of connectedness and confidence that wasn't available before. I agree that this may be possible, but one excerpt particularly blurred the line between correlation and causation, saying that "the internet's capacity for social connection" benefits lonely teens. I noticed that were no studies listed in the article that absolutely proved that the Internet's social media causes all lonesome kids to feel more socially connected. The article seems to jump from correlation to causation in regards to social media and confidence, when other factors could influence this.
The writer also makes the extraordinary claim that "One of social networking's greatest benefits is its ability to bring meaningful friendships to people who might otherwise be shunned as outcasts." Although this may be true, there is not sufficient evidence to support this claim within the article. No studies were reported that rank the benefits of social networking. I also found it interesting that the article didn't address a potential negative effect on teens using social media: Internet bullying.

What do you think? How much does social networking boost confidence and friendships?

Source: http://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/02/friends.aspx

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/177619

4 Comments

| Leave a comment

You posed some very interesting questions! That's a really interesting study, I'm so curious to hear about the methods behind this study. Many research articles, particularly mainstream articles that are psychology related make the jump from correlation to causation because they bring exciting and sensational results.

Though social media might make those that are lonely feel more "connected" there could be a strong argument that this connectedness is superficial, or not quite the same connectedness they would experience from socializing with people in life. There are many facets of emotion and relating to other people that I feel can't be captured online. Even something seemingly benign like sarcasm often loses it's meaning on the internet. What other aspects of emotions and rapport are being lost?

I agree with you, and I think you are very critical on this topic. Whether social networking helps teen's really social skills? I don't really think so, maybe it enhance teen's sense of loneliness. I have some friends. Their way of talking online and really life are totally different. Internet might cause different identity in real and virtual life.

As much as I like social networking sites like Facebook, I think being able to communicate and relate to people in real life verses doing it online, over the internet, are two very different things. Communicating to people online can only take a person so far. Eventually, they'll need to learn how to interact with people in real life as well.

Also, I can't remember exactly where it is that I heard this but I think social networking sites may also be detrimental to teenagers, making them feel MORE lonely and isolated. Take for example that whenever your friends posts up pictures or updates or anything of that sort, they're generally out and about, having fun and/or partying. Pretend that you on the other hand, don't go out that much. When you see the majority of your friends posting up such fun, marvelous lives, you feel sad and lonely that your life isn't as "fun" as theirs. So that in return, makes you feel isolated and left out. This was a real example given to me by a Professor. I don't remember which class it was but it makes a bit of sense too I'd say. Social networking sites may be fun but they may also be problematic as well.

While there is definitely validity to the social acceptance 'outcasts' can gain utilizing the social networking method, there are inherent risks with that also should they not utilize proper identity monitor practices. Just as they can add to their social status, it could also be reduced to rubble should someone else gain access to their account. It's a fragile line, but I do agree, very beneficial in the end.
Securing a blog, or social networking site is fairly reliable given stringent security requirement. I outline some in a blog I wrote not long ago, check it out if you like.
Blog URL: Identity Monitor and how it affects you.
Good writeup by the way, well done!
Darren

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by abdox021 published on February 8, 2012 1:23 AM.

Correlation versus Causation: Social Networking and Personal Confidence was the previous entry in this blog.

Grand Theft Childhood? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.