Liar liar

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

polygraph-quackery-09.jpg

There was a story about a little wooden puppet whose nose grew every time he told a lie. As the number of lies continued to grow so did his nose. This little puppet was named Pinocchio. As the story of the little puppet spread throughout time so did the myth that lie detector tests (also known as polygraph tests) measured the perfect indicators of lying through physiological and behavioral responses like how Pinocchio had shown through the growth of his nose. People are all too familiar with the lie detector tests, the media uses them constantly in their movies and television shows. The problem with this is that polygraph tests aren't 100% accurate when it comes to determining a guilty person from an innocent person. These tests measure the blood pressure, respiration, and skin conductance of the person that is being tested. There is a heightened autonomic activity in the body due to anxiety and the people being questioned are asked a series of questions that are relevant or irrelevant to the crime, and controlled. When a person is asked a question that is relevant to the crime and their autonomic activity level is high they are then labelled as deceptive because their autonomic response to the other questions were low, where if a person's activity level after a relevant question came up low they would be labelled as truthful.

Research studies have found that the polygraph test yields a high rate of false postives, meaning that a high number of innocent people are often labelled as guilty, and that the test often confuses responses of arousal with evidence of guilt. Researchers have made the comment that the detector has been misnamed and should be called the "arousal detector". Not only does the polygraph yield a high false positive rate but it also yields a high number of false negatives. People that are guilty have learned to beat the test, and therefore are labelled as innocent. The people who have learned to beat the test have done so by using countermeasures - methods designed to alter their responses to control questions. Finally, researchers have stated after proving the confusion of arousal and evidence of guilt that there is no such thing as the Pinocchio response.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/185014

6 Comments

| Leave a comment

The truth comes out about lie detector tests! I believe the use of these tests have no place in placing guilt on a person. There are definitely ways to hide true bodily responses. Although a bad example, in Oceans 13 one of the criminals has a electric pulse type gadget that masks his emotions and arousal. Against the most hardened criminals the test has to be ineffective because they know ways to beat it.

I myself agree with you in the fact that lie detector tests are not 100% positive results and in many cases have given negative results. Very clever idea with how to present your blog through the use of the story pinocchio!

This is so sad, but so true. I felt for awhile like I was the only one who knew about this. As soon as I read this in the textbook, I was really relieved that a lot of other students would soon read it too. Everytime I hear stories about people who have gone to jail for 10-30 years only to find out that they didn't commit a crime, it just saddens me. Not only because of the polygraph test, but also because of false memories, victims who can't remember who the person was, and unavailable dna testing (back then there wasn't available DNA testing). Hopefully we can soon surpass these tragedies.

I have heard of lie detector tests as being extremely faulty and that readings can easily be dismissed due to the anxiety created by simply being measured by the test before during and after the test. I have also heard of other tests that people can detect lies, through readings of facial expressions and physical ticks. A very interesting show that used to be on television was a series called Lie to Me in which the main character was a man who was a professional lie detector and helped solve crimes and cases with his skills. Check it out.

that's true, polygraph test is not accurate, for those who have been well-trained or with high sense of the rule of this test, it always makes them escaped and it shows high positive false, so the court don't really accept the evidence from polygraph.

I have never really been a fan of polygraph tests. There are many ways to beat them. They can also be wrong very often. I don't think something this unstable should be used in the conviction of someone. There needs to be clear cut hard evidence for a conviction to take place.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by huynh210 published on April 8, 2012 8:18 PM.

Beauty, in the eye of the beholder? was the previous entry in this blog.

The Definition of Beauty is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.