« December 2007 | Main | March 2008 »

February 28, 2008

Exploitation of a Tragedy

By Katherine Fennelly, Professor at the Humphrey H. Institute of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota, IHRC Affiliate

A tragic traffic accident this week has provided yet another opportunity for an outpouring of anger directed toward undocumented immigrants.

No one can be unmoved by the deaths of several children after a twenty-three year old woman apparently ran a stop sign and crashed into a school bus in Cottonwood, Minnesota. However, it is chilling to see the speed with which the tragedy has been exploited as an opportunity to rant against all undocumented immigrants, and—in some cases—against all immigrants. A colleague in south Central Minnesota sent out a plaintive email today decrying the media frenzy and the many loud demands to “send them all home�. What is the relevance, he asks, of her ethnicity or her immigration status? Ironically, the relevance of the case lies not in the characteristics of the driver, but in current legislation that denies drivers licenses (and thus opportunities for driver education and automobile insurance) to undocumented residents.

February 11, 2008

Immigrants and Election Year Politics

Donna R. Gabaccia, Director, Immigration History Research Center

When it comes to elections, immigrants have opinions too. Over one third of the foreign-born in the U.S. are citizens. How does this election year look to them?

For one thing, the numbers of immigrants choosing citizenship has increased sharply in the past year in places as diverse as Minnesota and Arizona. http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/local/64591.php

Immigrants have many reasons for becoming citizens. Some want to sponsor the immigration of relatives. Others want to act now in order to avoid paying fees for naturalization that have increased rapidly in the past few years. Others want to share the citizenship of their children or to express loyalty to their new home.

At least some recently naturalized citizens also admit that an important motive has been the desire to participate in American politics and especially to express their choices in the upcoming presidential election. Historically, naturalizations have increased during presidential election years.

Newly naturalized Latino voters are particularly concerned about immigration policy in this year’s elections. Recent news reports quote immigrants as feeling upset by local and federal campaigns that target illegal immigrants: they maintain that too often the result of these campaigns is hostility expressed against all Spanish-speakers or against any person who “looks Mexican,� regardless of legal status or citizenship. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/us/politics/05hispanic.html?em&ex=1202360400&en=90b43483ea8b4d1f&ei=5087%0A

Even more than other Americans, newly naturalized citizens pay attention to candidates’ positions on immigration policy. Some claim not to find much difference between front-runners Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain, all of whom favor some version of the immigration reform bill that failed to gain Congressional approval in 2007. http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-dustup5feb05,0,50671.story Still, Hillary Clinton seems to be doing particularly well in attracting the votes of Hispanic voters, both old and new: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18718803


Overall, too, those candidates who focused most intensively on the threat to Americans of illegal immigration have not done well in this primary season. Cuban-Americans in Florida were especially vigorous in supporting for McCain over Mitt Romney, who ended his presidential campaign last week. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120217267552142823.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Ironically, it appears that newly naturalized immigrant voters are in other ways not all that different from longer-time American citizens. Polls in 2007 showed that between half and four-fifths of all American citizen support the creation of a pathway to legalization for undocumented workers.

February 4, 2008

Minnesota Immigrants and the "Minnesota School"

Donna R. Gabaccia, Director, Immigration History Research Center

Minnesota’s foreign-born population has always been somewhat distinctive. So are the scholars who have studied immigration and refugees at the University of Minnesota.

In nineteenth century Minnesota, high proportion of Scandinavians distinguished the state; today it is high proportion of refugees, from both Southeast Asia and Africa, and large numbers of international students from China. In many respects, however, Minnesota’s foreign-born resemble their counterparts in other parts of the country. Thus, for example, a recent Minnesota Public Radio report on record numbers of Minnesota immigrants applying for citizenship, and experiencing long waits for the processing of their applications, (http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/01/10/immigration_numbers/
could have been about most any state in the northeast, west, or southeast.

The University of Minnesota has good claims to having actually “invented" the scholarly study of immigration way back in the 1920s. Here at the U, it was historians who began the study, focusing on some the groups that made their own state distinctive. Blegen Hall, on the University of Minnesota west bank campus, is named after one of these historians, Theodore Blegen, the son of Norwegian immigrants who specialized in the study of Norwegian migration to the United States. His colleague in history, George Stephenson—a descendant of and specialist on Swedish immigrants--offered what may have been the first immigration history course in the country in the early 1920s and published one of the first general introductions to the history of immigration his book in 1926. Blegen and Stephenson were early practictioners of what is today called “transnational" history. Both lived and taught for in the homelands of their ancestors; they also attracted graduate students from abroad during their long careers at Minnesota.

By the 1960s, younger historians hired by Blegen’s and Stephenson’s generation took up the study of immigration anew, focusing on the immigrants from southern and Eastern Europe who were attracted at the turn of the twentieth century to the mines, industries and cities of the Great Lakes economy. These new historians—Rudy Vecoli, Hy Berman, Clarke Chambers, Timothy Smith—helped to found important research collections, including the Immigrant Archives which eventually became the Immigration History Research Center (IHRC). The IHRC soon also began to collect documents and encourage scholarship that focused on the shift from labor migrations to refugees arriving from war-torn Europe after 1945.

As new waves of refugees began to re-shape Minnesota’s population in the 1970s and 1980s, a third generation of scholars quickly recognized scholarly opportunities and organized the Center for Refugee Studies. During its two decades existence, the center collected rich materials both on refugees from Southeast Asia and on the organizations that worked with these newcomers. Its archives are now housed in Andersen library at the IHRC.

Today, over 100 scholars at the University of Minnesota study migration or the cultural pluralism that accompanies histories of migration. For over 90 years, a distinctive “Minnesota" school of scholarship on immigrant and refugee life has used the changing population dynamics of its home state to grapple with issues of continuing importance not merely to the region but to the nation.

Interested in reading more about the “Minnesota school? http://ihrc.umn.edu/publications/pdf/MinnesotaSchool-1.pdf