Physics Nano News tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011-01-18:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251 2011-07-21T20:36:13Z Movable Type Enterprise 4.31-en Governor, Legislature approve new Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the U tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.299730 2011-07-20T17:42:44Z 2011-07-21T20:36:13Z As part of the budget negotiations during the 2011 first special session, Gov. Mark Dayton and the State Legislature approved $51.3 million for an Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. The building was part of larger... Rhonda Zurn As part of the budget negotiations during the 2011 first special session, Gov. Mark Dayton and the State Legislature approved $51.3 million for an Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. The building was part of larger capital investment bill approved by the governor and legislators early Wednesday, July 20. Construction on the new building is expected to begin in fall 2011. Physics Nano building schematic

Southwest perspective

As part of the budget negotiations during the 2011 first special session, Gov. Mark Dayton and the State Legislature approved $51.3 million for an Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. The building was part of larger capital investment bill approved by the governor and legislators early Wednesday, July 20. Construction on the new building is expected to begin this fall. In addition to the $51.3 million, the University of Minnesota received $4 million in planning money for the Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building during the 2010 Legislative Session. The remainder of the funding for the $80 million project will be paid by the University and private donations. Highlights of the building include 43,000 square feet of modern and highly flexible physics laboratories and laboratory support space and more than 15,000 square feet of nanotechnology research labs (including a 5,000-square-foot clean room). All together, the facility will contain about 40 new research laboratories. When built, this new state-of-the-art building will make a significant impact in advancing research and educating the next generation of high-tech workers in the state. "The $51.3 million from the state for the new Physics and Nanotechnology building is a giant step forward for the state and the University," said University of Minnesota President Eric Kaler. "It will help the University keep pace with the rapid global innovation in these fields and it secures the state of Minnesota's position as a leader in these ever-changing, cutting-edge technologies." From the beginning, the impetus for the new physics and nanotechnology building has involved a strong public-private partnership. "We are thankful to the business community for their support of this project at the Capitol," Kaler said. "We look forward to working closely with the business community as this project moves forward." Other University of Minnesota leaders echoed President Kaler's appreciation and excitement. "We are delighted that Gov. Dayton viewed this building as a priority," said Steven L. Crouch, dean of the University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering. Early in the 2011 regular legislative session Governor Dayton made this building a hallmark of the capital investment bill he proposed to the legislature. "Many legislators, regardless of their political persuasion, have also viewed this project as a priority, and we are grateful for their support," Crouch said. "This is tremendous news for the University and the technology community in our state. We are very pleased to have this building get the 'green light.'" In addition to University leaders, business and high tech community leaders in Minnesota worked to support the funding of this building. Leaders of MN Nano, a statewide association working to establish Minnesota's standing as a region of excellence in nanoscience, urged legislators to provide funding for the building. MN Nano advocated that a "supplemental bonding bill" should be a priority in 2011, despite the focus on the state's budget. They cited the importance of science and technology and the role this building project can play in boosting the state's future economy. "Seeing this building come to fruition has been a top legislative priority for us," explains Rich Baker, vice president of engineering for MTS Systems Corporation and MN Nano board chairman. "We are very pleased legislators and the governor agreed to advance this project now, rather than wait for the 2012 session. This means construction crews can be in the ground soon, putting up a building that will play a critical role in this state's ability to compete for highly-skilled faculty and graduate students." Baker acknowledged the many private-sector individuals who have taken the time to contact their legislators so lawmakers would see the importance of this project, not as "just another building at the University," but as "vitally important to fast-tracking interdisciplinary research for commercialization opportunities to positively impact our future economy." The University of Minnesota has been working with its architectural partners, Architectural Alliance in cooperation with Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Architects, LLP. During the planning process, the University of Minnesota also has selected Mortenson Construction for construction of the future state-of-the-art physics and nanotechnology building. An announcement will come soon regarding a date for the groundbreaking. ]]> Contact legislators now to support new Physics & Nano Building tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.293525 2011-05-20T15:22:35Z 2011-05-20T15:24:56Z The 2011 Minnesota Legislative Session is rapidly heading toward its adjournment date (midnight Monday, May 23), but it's still possible there will be a bonding package included in a "final agreement" between the Legislature and Gov. Mark Dayton. Therefore, it... Rhonda Zurn The 2011 Minnesota Legislative Session is rapidly heading toward its adjournment date (midnight Monday, May 23), but it's still possible there will be a bonding package included in a "final agreement" between the Legislature and Gov. Mark Dayton. Therefore, it is important for you to contact your Minnesota legislators NOW. Support from out-of-state alumni and friends is also important to show the wide reach of this research facility. "If there is a bonding package included in the final hours of the 2011 Legislative Session, please support including monies for the proposed Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building so the project can begin construction yet this summer. Please urge legislative leaders to advance this project THIS YEAR." Please visit the "District Finder" on the Minnesota Legislative website to connect with your state representative and state senator. Simply put in your home Zip Code and you will be directed to the appropriate email addresses. Thank you for taking the time to weigh in with your own legislators! Also send emails to the Governor and chairs of the Minnesota House and Senate Capital Investment Committees: Gov. Mark Dayton--send emails to Erin.Campbell@state.mn.us Rep.Larry.Howes@house.mn Sen.David.Senjem@senate.mn All of this contact WILL help. Thank you!]]> Fate of U's Physics and Nano Building still undecided tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.292829 2011-05-11T18:17:08Z 2011-05-12T16:32:54Z As the regular Minnesota Legislative Session nears completion, the fate of the University's proposed Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building is still undecided. Despite no decision on if there will even be a bonding bill, bipartisan groups of legislators introduced two... Rhonda Zurn As the regular Minnesota Legislative Session nears completion, the fate of the University's proposed Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building is still undecided. Despite no decision on if there will even be a bonding bill, bipartisan groups of legislators introduced two bills earlier this session (Senate File 562 and House File 857) to provide general obligation bonding for the project. The University of Minnesota is requesting $51.3 million for a new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building. When constructed, this new state-of-the-art building will make a significant impact in advancing research and educating the next generation of high-tech workers in the state. There's still time to contact your legislators to show your support for this important University initiative. Senate File 562 and House File 857 were introduced in early March 2011. The University of Minnesota is requesting $51.3 million for a new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building. When constructed, this new state-of-the-art building will make a significant impact in advancing research and educating the next generation of high-tech workers in the state. There is still time for you to contact your legislators to show your support for this important University initiative. Contact your legislator Ask your legislators to support these bills and encourage the passage of a bonding bill this session! Visit the University of Minnesota Legislative Action Center to find out who represents you and contact them. Follow the progress of the bills If you'd like to "watch" the activity on these bills, visit "My Bills" on the Minnesota State Legislature website to register to receive email updates as the bills make their way through the legislative process.]]> New architectural drawings released for Physics and Nanotechnology Building tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.292826 2011-05-11T18:02:02Z 2011-05-11T19:06:32Z The University of Minnesota recently released new exterior architectural drawings of the proposed Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building. These new drawings represent the design development phase, the third phase of the design process. Last year, the Minnesota Legislature approved $4... Rhonda Zurn The University of Minnesota recently released new exterior architectural drawings of the proposed Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building. These new drawings represent the design development phase, the third phase of the design process. Last year, the Minnesota Legislature approved $4 million in planning money for the building. If the 2011 Minnesota Legislature approves full funding for the building, construction could begin as early as fall 2011. Physics Nano building schematic

Southwest perspective

The University of Minnesota recently released new exterior architectural drawings of the proposed Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building. Last year, the Minnesota Legislature approved $4 million in planning money for the building. These new drawings represent the design development phase, the third phase of the design process. Earlier drawings represented the predesign and schematic design phases. The next step is to develop designs for the final construction documents phase used to build the building.
bldgA.jpg

South perspective

Designs are being produced by the Architectural Alliance in cooperation with Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Architects, LLP. During the planning process, the University of Minnesota also has selected Mortenson Construction for construction of the future state-of-the-art physics and nanotechnology building if approved by the Legislature. The building will provide modern and highly flexible physics laboratory, laboratory support space, and nanotechnology space (including a 5,000-square-foot clean room). All together, the facility will contain about 40 new research laboratories. If the 2011 Minnesota Legislature approves full funding for the building, construction could begin as early as fall 2011.]]> Feature: Researchers use nanotechnology to trick T cells tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.292825 2011-05-11T17:59:04Z 2011-05-11T19:16:47Z For many, the word "nanotechnology" evokes ideas of computers and other electronic devices. However, at the University of Minnesota, the search for nano applications also extends into medicine. Department of Chemistry associate professor Andrew Taton and a cross-disciplinary team have... Rhonda Zurn For many, the word "nanotechnology" evokes ideas of computers and other electronic devices. However, at the University of Minnesota, the search for nano applications also extends into medicine. Department of Chemistry associate professor Andrew Taton and a cross-disciplinary team have set a highly ambitious research goal: to create a cancer vaccine that uses nanoparticles coated with proteins that will essentially fool T cells, one of the body's main lines of immunoresponse to antigens, into thinking the particles are cancer cells. "We want to create nanoparticles that will trigger an immune response to cancer cells," Taton said. Andrew Taton photo

Andrew Taton, associate professor of chemistry, is working to find general chemistries that connect nano-objects to biological molecules. He is working to create a vaccine that uses nanoparticles coated with proteins that will fool T cells into thinking the particles are cancer cells.

For many, the word "nanotechnology" evokes ideas of computers and other electronic devices. However, at the University, the search for nano applications also extends into medicine. "That should come as no surprise," observes Andrew Taton, an associate professor of chemistry. "The University has a fantastic history of taking materials and applying them to medicine." "It's only natural," he said, "for us to try to make the connection with biology and medicine on the nano scale, too." In taking up that challenge, Taton and a cross-disciplinary team have set a highly ambitious research goal: to create a cancer vaccine that uses nanoparticles coated with proteins that will essentially fool T cells, one of the body's main lines of immunoresponse to antigens, into thinking the particles are cancer cells. The objective? "Getting the immune system to respond to cancer, and to remember it." Taton said. Vaccines make the immune system respond to a threat that's not really there--like how the harmless cowpox virus is used as a vaccine against deadly smallpox. If all goes well, the immune system also remembers the threat, and fights it long into the future. "We want to create nanoparticles that will trigger an immune response to cancer cells," Taton said. The tough part of that task is that cancer cells look a lot like normal cells--and training T cells to distinguish between the two is difficult. Taton's hope is that by attaching cancer-related proteins to the nanoparticles, he can send T cells off hunting for cancer cells that may have eluded detection--before they can develop into tumors or metastasize.
Andrew Taton's lab photo

Above are brightly colored test tubes containing organic molecules used to connect proteins to nanoparticles. Taton is creating nanoparticles that will trigger an immune response to cancer cells.

To date, Taton and his collaborators have made nanoparticles that are coated with a model protein, and then combined these particles in a dish with T cells from mice that have been genetically modified to produce only T cells that respond to this particular kind of protein. Preliminary results are good so far. The T cells are binding with nanoparticles and displaying other signs typical of an immune response, like T cell division. From there, it's a big jump to develop nanoparticles that will evoke the same response from T-cells designed to respond to cancer. Taton is optimistic. An ideal cancer vaccine would be one that would immunize the body forever. Even if the research team finds something not quite that definitive, Taton will count it a success. "The best immunotherapies trigger a response where we retain T cells that will respond if you are exposed to the same antigens," he said. "Even a cancer vaccine that only triggers a short-term response--like in a melanoma patient who might have migrating cancer cells, or a patient in post-operative treatment after cancer surgery when the risk of metastasis is highest--would benefit from a vaccine that might, say, trigger a seven-day response to cancer cells. This would be a big step forward."]]> CSE Dean's Advisory Board supports new building tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.292830 2011-05-11T15:20:53Z 2011-05-12T16:29:40Z The following is an excerpt of a letter submitted by the University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering Advisory Board to Minnesota legislative leaders. We recognize prioritization and alignment of finite financial resources is your priority during this legislative... Rhonda Zurn The following is an excerpt of a letter submitted by the University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering Advisory Board to Minnesota legislative leaders. We recognize prioritization and alignment of finite financial resources is your priority during this legislative session. While it's presently unclear whether or not there will be an appetite for a capital investment funding bill, we are writing today to encourage your strongest support for the proposed experimental physics and nanotechnology advancement building at the University of Minnesota. As members of the College of Science and Engineering Dean's Advisory Board, we see the building as an important tool in this state's ability to compete long-term in science and technology-focused job creation and growth, as the University of Minnesota's environment for interdisciplinary research will be dramatically enhanced when the building is complete. ]]> The following is a letter submitted by the University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering Advisory Board to Minnesota legislative leaders. Dear Minnesota Legislative Leaders, We recognize prioritization and alignment of finite financial resources is your priority during this legislative session. While it's presently unclear whether or not there will be an appetite for a capital investment funding bill, we are writing today to encourage your strongest support for the proposed experimental physics and nanotechnology advancement building at the University of Minnesota when you evaluate requests coming to your committees. We see the building as an important tool in this state's ability to compete long-term in science and technology-focused job creation and growth, as the University of Minnesota's environment for interdisciplinary research will be dramatically enhanced when the building is complete. As members of the College of Science and Engineering Dean's Advisory Board, we see first-hand the strides the university is making in nanotechnology research, but we are also keenly aware of the need for a new facility to be able to expand the research even more. Most of us are also involved in business and industry that will benefit from the leadership the university will be able to provide in nanotechnology research if given adequate facilities. Nanotechnology will be a major job creator, so we need a prepared workforce if we want to capture the anticipated job growth here in our state. Minnesota companies will go elsewhere to complete sponsored research if the University doesn't have the capacity to do the work--and the eventual commercial development cycles will likely unfold elsewhere, too. This facility represents a major leap in capabilities, dramatically enhancing manipulation abilities for advanced materials. Minnesota is already a "world capital" for matter studies--we need to advance this building project to leverage our strengths. The 2010 bonding package included planning monies for this important project and it would be ready to break ground this coming spring if the full funding were approved. We urge you to make this building a high priority for its overall benefit to the state Should you have any specific questions about the proposed building project, we know Steve Crouch, University of Minnesota Dean of the College of Science & Engineering would be delighted to meet with you to brief you on the project's current progress. Respectfully submitted, The Advisory Board to the College of Science & Engineering Krzysztof Burhardt Partner, Clotho & Associates Doug Cameron Founder and Managing Director, Alberti Advisors, LLC Alex Cirillo Jr. Retired Staff VP 3M Community Affairs Edward Cunnington Retired President Tescom Corp. John Dexheimer President, Lightwave Advisors Sundararajan Dhamotharan Executive VP, URS Corporation Drew Flaada Director, Mayo Collaboration & Emerging Solutions Dev. IBM Roger Haxby Retired, Tiger Development James Heppelmann President & CEO, Parametric Technology Corporation Bonnie Holub CEO ArcLight Technology Consulting Peter Jackson Chief Scientist, Thomson Reuters R.M. (Rich) Kruger President, ExxonMobil Production Company Cyndi Lesher Retired Chief Executive Officer Northern States Power Co. Donald Gerhardt Retired President and CEO LifeScience Alley John S. Mendesh Director of Research/Development, General Mills, Inc. Bill Mularie President & CEO, Telework Consortium Gary Obermiller Managing Director, Mill City Capital Ken Pucel EVP Global Operations and Technology, Boston Scientific Corp. Gerald Timm President, CT Urological, LLC Debra L. Wilfong VP and Chief Technology Officer, Donaldson Co. Inc. Todd Zarfos VP of Engineering, The Boeing Company ]]> Legislators introduce bill language in support of Physics/Nano Building tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.279644 2011-03-10T18:07:43Z 2011-03-11T14:26:13Z While it's still unclear whether there will be a bonding bill in the 2011 Minnesota Legislative Session, bipartisan groups of legislators from both the House and Senate are anxious to put bill language in play in support of a new... Rhonda Zurn Senate File 562 authored by Sen. Julie Rosen (R-Fairmont) and House File 857 authored by Rep. Tim Mahoney (DFL-St. Paul). Both legislators have a long history of supporting Minnesota's science and technology development opportunities.]]> While it's still unclear whether there will be a bonding bill in the 2011 Minnesota Legislative Session, bipartisan groups of legislators from both the House and Senate are anxious to put bill language in play in support of a new University of Minnesota Physics and Nanotechnology Building. "If the 'train' does ever leave the station, you for sure want to be ready to jump on," explained one House staff leader. Two bills to provide general obligation bonding for the project were introduced earlier this month: Senate File 562 authored by Sen. Julie Rosen (R-Fairmont) and House File 857 authored by Rep. Tim Mahoney (DFL-St. Paul). Both legislators have a long history of supporting Minnesota's science and technology development opportunities and have each authored and co-sponsored multiple pieces of supportive legislation in the past nine years. "When I consider the promise nanotechnology holds for both the food protection/production industries, as well as future applications in energy, it's irrefutable that Minnesota needs to at least stay on par with other states [and nations] that are making strategic investments to leverage nanotechnology," said Rosen, a Colorado native who was educated as an agronomist and is a skilled policy maker particularly in agricultural and environmental issues. "I want to see our researchers' physical quarters provide them the platform they need to work together at the University, as well as with the businesses that will eventually bring new technologies to the marketplace," Rosen said. Sen. Rosen has carried past legislation focused on expanding opportunities for nano-enabled research, including a proposed nanotechnology development fund (NDF) and a proposed project to study and develop nano-based opportunities for the state. On the House side, Rep. Mahoney had a major hand in the 2010 passage of Minnesota's Angel Investor Tax Credits and has even organized events to help his capitol colleagues become more knowledgeable about science and technology's advantages to the state's future economy. "Just as businesses need to invest in their facilities, the university needs to keep pace with its competitors, too. This building will bring a dimension to the reserchers' ability to work together, as well as to attract new faculty, graduate students and expand, strengthen and accelerate research projects with Minnesota businesses," said Mahoney, a lifelong Minnesotan who currently serves as a member of the Jobs and Economic Development Finance Committee and has previously served as chair of the Minnesota House of Representatives Biosciences and Emerging Technology Committee. "Linking the University with business here in the state strengthens our economic future." Follow the progress of the bills If you'd like to "watch" the activity on these bills, visit "My Bills" on the Minnesota State Legislature website to register to receive email updates as the bills make their way through the legislative process. Are YOUR legislators confirmed supporters yet? In addition to Sen. Rosen, co-authors of SF562 are Sen. David Senjem (R-Rochester), Chair, Senate Capital Investment Committee; Sen. Jim Metzen (DFL-South St. Paul); Sen. Terri Bonoff (DFL-Minnetonka); and Sen. Carla Nelson (R-Rochester). In addition to Rep. Mahoney, co-authors of HF857 are Rep. Bob Gunther (R-Fairmont); Rep. Kim Norton (DFL-Rochester); Rep. Greg Davids (R-Preston); Rep. Larry Howes (R-Walker), Chair of the House Capital Investment Committee; Rep. Duane Quam (R-Byron); Rep. Mike Beard (R-Shakopee); Rep. Carol McFarlane (R-White Bear Lake); and Rep. King Banaian (R-St. Cloud). To send these legislators an email thanking them for their support, click on the list below. If YOUR legislators are NOT currently shown here, please visit the Legislative Geographic Information Services website to find out who represents you and contact them. Ask your legislators to support these bills and encourage the passage of a bonding bill this session! Senate File 562 authors: Sen. Julie Rosen (R-Fairmont) Sen. David Senjem (R-Rochester) Sen. Jim Metzen (DFL-South St. Paul) Sen. Terri Bonoff (DFL-Minnetonka) Sen. Carla Nelson (R-Rochester). House File 857 authors: Rep. Tim Mahoney (DFL-St. Paul) Rep. Bob Gunther (R-Fairmont) Rep. Kim Norton (DFL-Rochester) Rep. Greg Davids (R-Preston) Rep. Larry Howes (R-Walker) Rep. Duane Quam (R-Byron) Rep. Mike Beard (R-Shakopee) Rep. Carol McFarlane (R-White Bear Lake) Rep. King Banaian (R-St. Cloud)]]> Feature: Researchers use nano to lessen cancer treatment side effects tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.279641 2011-03-10T17:53:53Z 2011-03-11T14:34:22Z Ready, Aim, Fire Dealing with complex diseases, like cancer, have left medical experts with limited means to treat patients. A significant problem with cancer treatment is that in addition to trying to control the disease, oncologists are always trying to... Rhonda Zurn Ready, Aim, Fire Dealing with complex diseases, like cancer, have left medical experts with limited means to treat patients. A significant problem with cancer treatment is that in addition to trying to control the disease, oncologists are always trying to find new ways to limit the side effects of the treatment. Efie Kokkoli, an associate professor of chemical engineering and materials science, along with graduate students Todd Pangburn and Ashish Garg are working for a solution to this problem designing peptides as medicinal "bullets." The scope of Kokkoli's research focuses primarily on two areas: targeting cancer and drug delivery. ]]>
Efie Kokkoli, assistant professor of chemical engineering and materials science,
and graduate students, Todd Pangburn and Ashish Garg. Ready, Aim, Fire Dealing with complex diseases, like cancer, have left medical experts with limited means to treat patients. A significant problem with cancer treatment is that in addition to trying to control the disease, oncologists are always trying to find new ways to limit the side effects of the treatment. Efie Kokkoli, an associate professor of chemical engineering and materials science, along with graduate students Todd Pangburn and Ashish Garg, are working for a solution to this problem designing peptides as medicinal "bullets." The scope of Kokkoli's research focuses primarily on two areas: targeting cancer and drug delivery. "For drug delivery, we basically design very tiny nanoparticles or very small spherical particles that are hollow. So inside this particle we can encapsulate a variety of payloads," said Kokkoli. Some of the different contents of the particles include DNA for gene therapy, different types of protein, or chemotherapy agents. Essentially, the particles can be modified for different purposes. The benefits of this research are finding new ways to fight cancer more effectively while also limiting the side effects of treatment. Kokkoli expands on this fact stating, "the peptides go and attack the tumor but do not hurt the healthy organs. This is a benefit for us because whatever we want to deliver is very toxic." There is currently a lot of research looking at ways to treat cancer, but Kokkoli notes the design of peptides being the novel component. "If we are asked what our signature is, I think it is the peptides that we design," said Kokkoli. Building to a Better Future As Kokkoli's research comes closer to fruition, one delay in the process is the lack of a central location for nanotechnology research at the University of Minnesota. "My students have to go to different buildings all around the campus or even to the St. Paul campus; sometimes the instruments are overused so you have to wait for a couple of weeks before you get access," said Kokkoli. "The new facilities will allow for better collaborations, idea exchanges, and it would be a great, unique place," said Kokkoli.]]> Alumni perspective: Building is critical to Minnesota's success tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.279640 2011-03-10T17:47:24Z 2011-03-11T14:35:34Z By David Toyli (Physics '08) California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Santa Barbara As a former physics undergraduate student at the University of Minnesota who has gone on to graduate studies at the University of California Santa Barbara in the... Rhonda Zurn By David Toyli (Physics '08) California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Santa Barbara As a former physics undergraduate student at the University of Minnesota who has gone on to graduate studies at the University of California Santa Barbara in the field of nanotechnology, I fully support the construction of a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. The construction of a new building would provide essential tools for the continued success of engineering, biomedical, and physical science researchers currently in Minnesota and would help to draw outstanding new faculty to train the next generation of Minnesota scientists and technologists. The extent to which the state of Minnesota remains competitive in these areas principally rests on the state's willingness to invest in its science and technology infrastructure at the University of Minnesota. By David Christle (Physics '09, Math '09) California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Santa Barbara Because of my research experience as an undergraduate student at the University of Minnesota and now as a graduate student at the University of California Santa Barbara, I have been able to compare the cleanroom facilities at both universities. Our cleanroom facilities at UCSB have been a boon for research. I support a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota because of the overall impact that up-to-date cleanroom facilities have on attracting business and university collaborators, spurring new start-up companies, and preparing students for future jobs. ]]> By David Toyli (Physics '08) California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Santa Barbara Toyli 126.jpg As a former physics undergraduate student at the University of Minnesota who has gone on to graduate studies at the University of California Santa Barbara in the field of nanotechnology, I fully support the construction of a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. I immensely benefited from Minnesota's strong interdisciplinary science and engineering programs while attending the 'U.' I feel that because of my strong coursework, dedicated mentors, and exceptional peers in the University of Minnesota Honors Program, I was well-prepared for a career as a scientist. I have learned that my degree from Minnesota gives me an immediate credibility in both national and international research communities. For this to continue for future generations of University of Minnesota undergraduates, graduate students, and faculty, it is essential that the state invest in a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building. Many of Minnesota's facilities, such as its aged physics building that lacks basic climate, atmosphere, and vibration controls standard at other public institutions, do not adequately equip the exceptional faculty and research staff employed by the University. The construction of a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building would provide essential tools for the continued success of engineering, biomedical, and physical science researchers currently in Minnesota and would help to draw outstanding new faculty to train the next generation of Minnesota scientists and technologists. These are the people who will drive the continued success of Minnesota technology companies such as 3M and Seagate and will be the innovators who spur on smaller businesses like NVE. The extent to which the State of Minnesota remains competitive in these areas principally rests on the state's willingness to invest in its science and technology infrastructure at the University of Minnesota. By David Christle (Physics '09, Math '09) California NanoSystems Institute, University of California Santa Barbara Christle 126.jpg I graduated in 2009 from the University of Minnesota with bachelor's degrees in both physics and mathematics. As an undergraduate student, I worked for Professor Paul Crowell doing work in the basement of the University of Minnesota's current physics building and in the University's cleanroom. I am now a graduate student at the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB) working for Professor David Awschalom studying diamond applications for quantum information processing. Because of my research experience as an undergraduate student in Minnesota and now as a graduate student at UCSB, I have been able to compare the cleanroom facilities at both universities. I support a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota because of the overall impact that up-to-date cleanroom facilities have on attracting business and university collaborators, spurring new start-up companies, and preparing students for future jobs. At UCSB, we have four e-beam evaporators, four sputters, a JEOL e-beam, some SEMs, about 10 wetbenches, and other equipment. The facility is constantly used, even with all the equipment. Other researchers from other universities will routinely travel to our cleanroom to use particular pieces of equipment. One of our collaborators at Hewlett-Packard wants to come use our JEOL lithography system and other equipment. Our cleanroom facilities at UCSB have been a boon for research. In addition to well-established companies, good facilities draw numerous start-ups companies. It's really incredible how often I see people from outside the university coming in to use the facility. There are researchers from CREE, Transphorm, Freedom Photonics, and many other companies. Some of the start-ups companies have been started by former grads, so the cleanroom can be an asset to the entire community, not just the university and other academic researchers. The cleanroom seems to really have an effect on bringing new companies to the area because it is somewhat unique. Research isn't the only draw for companies. Companies like FLIR, Lockheed-Martin and Raytheon have facilities in the Santa Barbara area to recruit physics and materials students for employment because of their specific research experience in materials growth and device processing, all leveraged by the large cleanroom facility. The research done by graduate students at UCSB sets them up for future jobs at these companies, who are coming up with better, cheaper infrared detection devices, and other next-generation semiconductor devices. Minnesota can also be a draw for high-tech research and developing the next generation of innovators. With a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building and expanded cleanroom facilities, we can make this a reality. -- Tell us YOUR story. Send an email to csecomm@umn.edu outlining why you think a new Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota is critical to Minnesota's future.]]> Governor's capital investment plan includes U's Physics and Nano Building tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.271818 2011-01-31T21:10:53Z 2011-02-01T20:34:06Z Gov. Mark Dayton recently released his recommendations for $1 billion in state-backed construction projects, including $51.3 million for a new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. The governor specifically outlined $531 million in projects and wants... Rhonda Zurn Gov. Mark Dayton recently released his recommendations for $1 billion in state-backed construction projects, including $51.3 million for a new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. The governor specifically outlined $531 million in projects and wants the Legislature to select $470 in additional projects to make up the bill. Gov Dayton with College of Science and Engineering students

College of Science and Engineering students attending the Governor's bonding priorities press conference included (from left) graduate students Steven Snyder (physics) and Andrew Lyle (electrical and computer engineering) and undergraduate student Molly Krogstad (physics). Also attending was (far right) Bob Hoerr, cofounder of St. Paul nanotechnology company Nanocopoeia.

Gov. Mark Dayton recently released his recommendations for $1 billion in state-backed construction projects, including $51.3 million for a new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building at the University of Minnesota. The governor specifically outlined $531 million in projects and wants the Legislature to select $470 in additional projects to make up the bill. This is the second time the governor's office has supported state funding for the physics and nanotechnology building. The 2010 bonding priorities supported by then governor Tim Pawlenty featured the building, but only $4 million in planning money was included in the final bill passed by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Pawlenty. University of Minnesota President Bob Bruininks praised Dayton's recommendation for a new physics and nanotechnology building. "Challenging budget times mean it's more important than ever that the investments we do make are smart and benefit Minnesota's economy. A strong physics program is the backbone of cutting-edge teaching and research," Bruininks said. "Enabling the university to strengthen our focus on physics and nanotechnology will greatly enhance our ability to educate the science workforce of the future." The governor's capital investment proposal is the first step in an ongoing discussion with the Minnesota Legislature regarding the possibility of a bonding bill during the 2011 session. It's traditional for the Minnesota Legislature to pass large bonding bills in even-numbered years, but Dayton has said he hopes for a large bill this year to take advantage of low interest rates and to inject some money in the construction sector this year. The bonding bill discussion will likely be overshadowed this year by the state's looming budget woes. The legislature is grappling with a $6.2 billion deficit in the state's biennial budget and it is currently unclear whether or not a bonding bill will even become a dual-track topic of discussion during this session this year. If the legislators engage in a bonding discussion, political analysts predict that their appetite for a capital investment bill will be considerably smaller than the $1 billion package the Governor has proposed. "No matter what the size of the final bill, we are hoping that legislators recognize the physics and nanotechnology building as key to the state's overall science and technology ecosystem. We need them to include it in the final bonding bill," said Steven L. Crouch, Dean of the University's College of Science and Engineering. "This new state-of-the-art building is vital to our goal of advancing research and educating the next generation of high-tech workers in the state." Crouch attended the governor's press conference on Monday, Jan. 31 accompanied by University of Minnesota graduate students Steven Snyder (physics) and Andrew Lyle (electrical and computer engineering), undergraduate student Molly Krogstad (physics), and Bob Hoerr, co-founder and chair of the Scientific Board of Advisors for the St. Paul-based nanotechnology company, Nanocopoeia, and member of the board of directors of MN Nano.]]> Feature: Researchers developing nano solutions for corneal transplants tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.271817 2011-01-31T21:05:41Z 2011-02-01T19:55:38Z The cornea is one of the most important parts of our body because it enables our power of sight. It is also one of the most common parts of our body to break down over the years. University of Minnesota... Rhonda Zurn The cornea is one of the most important parts of our body because it enables our power of sight. It is also one of the most common parts of our body to break down over the years. University of Minnesota mechanical engineering professor Allison Hubel is using nanotechnology to develop an artificial substitute for the cornea. By Drew Virtue Seeing is believing The cornea is one of the most important parts of our body because it enables our power of sight. It is also one of the most common parts of our body to break down over the years. "The cornea is the most commonly transplanted tissue in the country, far more commonly than kidneys, or hearts, or lungs, or anything else that is transplantable," said University of Minnesota mechanical engineering professor Allison Hubel. "About 44,000 individuals a year get corneal transplants and with the population aging that need will only continue to grow." Professor Hubel's nanotechnology-enabled research to develop an artificial substitute for the cornea becomes more important every day. A new way to see "The physical structure of the cornea is unlike any other structure in the body and is very unique, and as a result it is not inconceivable that a replacement for it must also be nano structured," explains Hubel. "What we are working on right now is using a hybrid material that is naturally occurring molecules, but two of the molecules together will influence the self-assembly, the actual molecular and nano scale structure of the material," she said.
Allison Hubel photo

Allison Hubel

The unique aspect of this research has thus far led to significant success, "We are the only place in the country that is using this very novel silica hybrid within our development of artificial corneas." There is similar cornea replacement research under way elsewhere, but the focus of that work relies on synthetic polymers. Synthetic polymers offer many potential benefits to the development of artificial corneas, but lack the characteristics to make it a compatible product for the biological environment in the eye. Developing a new biomedical technology, Hubel explains, presents dual challenges. "Any time you deal with biomedical applications you have the challenges inherent to the technology you're developing coupled with the challenges of that application in a biological environment." The professor notes these challenges are both exciting components of her work, however, because they present unique "challenges and opportunities" for her and her research team. Moving from science to practice Hubel's use of a silica hybrid has offered significant advantages for this cornea product to eventually be accepted by a biological system. "We're working in conjunction with a group at the Mayo Clinic assessing the bio compatibility, so we can actually bring this far enough along that it could be licensed to a company or something of the sort, but [that next group] would be responsible for clinical trials," explains Hubel.]]> Your support needed at Legislature tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.271815 2011-01-31T21:02:19Z 2011-02-01T20:29:53Z During the Legislative Session, the University will be asked for specific examples of the impact of physics and nanotechnology research and why legislators should use finite capital investment resources to fund a new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building this year.... Rhonda Zurn lynne@mnnano.org who is documenting timely anecdotes for the University to bring to legislators. ]]> lynne@mnnano.org who is documenting timely anecdotes for the University to bring to legislators. We will give these examples to lawmakers to help deepen their understanding of how important this new building is to research and our economy. Additionally, if you are simply willing to sign a letter of support for this project, contact Osterman at lynne@mnnano.org. Your active support is essential to helping this project move forward.]]> University planning to request new Physics and Nanotechnology Building tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.269161 2011-01-18T19:16:50Z 2011-01-31T20:53:25Z A new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building is on the list of capital building projects the University of Minnesota included for review by the Board of Regents at their last meeting and is scheduled for final approval in February. The... Rhonda Zurn A new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building is on the list of capital building projects the University of Minnesota included for review by the Board of Regents at their last meeting and is scheduled for final approval in February. The exact amount of the request for the building will be set by the Board and is expected to be slightly more than $50 million for the project that is estimated to top $80 million total. The remainder of the project cost will be paid by the University and private donations. www.supporttheu.umn.edu.]]> University provides first look at new building schematic design tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.269160 2011-01-18T19:14:16Z 2011-01-31T20:53:57Z The University of Minnesota recently released new architectural schematic design documents of the Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building on the Twin Cities campus. The documents will be presented to the Board of Regents for review at their February meeting. The... Rhonda Zurn The University of Minnesota recently released new architectural schematic design documents of the Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building on the Twin Cities campus. The documents will be presented to the Board of Regents for review at their February meeting. The building will provide modern and highly flexible physics laboratory, laboratory support space, and nanotechnology space (including a 5,000-square-foot clean room). All together, the facility will contain about 40 new research laboratories. The University of Minnesota recently released new architectural schematic design documents of the Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building on the Twin Cities campus. The documents will be presented to the Board of Regents for review at their February meeting. The schematic design documents represent an early design concept for the building that will continue to be refined through the other subsequent design phases until construction documents are completed. The building will provide modern and highly flexible physics laboratory, laboratory support space, and nanotechnology space (including a 5,000-square-foot clean room). All together, the facility will contain about 40 new research laboratories. During the planning process, the University of Minnesota also has selected Mortenson Construction for construction of the future state-of-the-art physics and nanotechnology building if approved by the Legislature. The project continues Mortenson's long-standing relationship with the University that dates back nearly 50 years and leverages Mortenson's experience in research facility construction. Planning and design is continuing with construction slated to begin when approved by the Legislature. ]]> New building is key to Minnesota's highest caliber research tag:blog.lib.umn.edu,2011:/itcomm/physicsnano//13251.269158 2011-01-18T19:09:16Z 2011-01-31T20:58:36Z By Steven L. Crouch, Dean University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering Environments cultivating innovation don't all look the same. The advent of technology, which eventually spawned medical device giant Medtronic, occurred in a garage after a whole lot... Rhonda Zurn By Steven L. Crouch, Dean University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering Environments cultivating innovation don't all look the same. The advent of technology, which eventually spawned medical device giant Medtronic, occurred in a garage after a whole lot of visionary tinkering. Today, however, the technologies at researchers' disposal have become increasingly advanced. How we prepare the eventual workforce to leverage growing enabling technologies is critical. ]]> By Steven L. Crouch, Dean University of Minnesota College of Science and Engineering Environments cultivating innovation don't all look the same. The advent of technology, which eventually spawned medical device giant Medtronic, occurred in a garage after a whole lot of visionary tinkering. Today, however, the technologies at researchers' disposal have become increasingly advanced. Most private sector and academic researchers aren't apt to "tinker" in any space other than a lab equipped with the very highest caliber equipment--and with a team of highly skilled and highly educated colleagues from varied disciplines or specialties. How we prepare the eventual workforce to leverage growing enabling technologies is critical. The environment in which current and future innovation is cultivated is a major ingredient--the very buildings themselves are central to this process and the life of the current physics building has been extended as far as it possibly can be. The University of Minnesota has successfully attracted incredibly talented faculty researchers who in turn have surrounded themselves with talented graduate and undergraduate students, amassing quite a pool of human resources over the years, but elements of the physical resources in which researchers collaborate have become an issue. Research teams at the University are anxious to see this building come on line! Professor Uwe Kortshagen, head of the University's Department of Mechanical Engineering, is leading a team of researchers that has discovered a unique and highly-efficient process to make silicon nanocrystals. The initial work was in the early 2000s and was licensed by the University to a small St. Paul-based company for its potential to lower the cost of solar cells. In 2005, the company decided to relocate to Silicon Valley, where it has grown significantly since. The "environment" for University research collaborators to work in hasn't kept pace with other academic research institutions. That means our students could eventually lose ground on the level of experience they need to be the best-prepared candidates for jobs in companies throughout this region, as well as reducing the likelihood of investigative results on par with that of Professor Kortshagen's research. We can turn the tide with a new Experimental Physics and Nanotechnology Building. With your support, we can educate the next generation of strong high-tech workers and keep Minnesota as a strong innovator.]]>