Although months have passed since the collapse of the 35W bridge, new details are still emerging regarding MnDOt's handling of the catastrophe. Both the Star Tribune and the Pioneer Press have released reports criticizing the department’s handling of bridge-related matters, specifically its relationship with independent contractors.
According to the Star Tribune, an engineering firm hired to evaluate the structural integrity of the bridge (URS Inc.) played a “diminishing role� in decisions about the bridge. “The records also show that URS was puzzled when MnDOT suddenly cast doubt on the consultant's $2 million plan to strengthen the bridge with steel plates,� the report continues.
The report also claims that the management of URS changed their position on whether or not labor-intensive measures were necessary to renovate the bridge. While URS generally pushed for steel-plate replacement, e-mail exchanges provided puzzlingly contradictory views on the matter. “Three weeks after a top URS official had reiterated that the chance of a bridge truss failure ‘should be significantly reduced’ by the replating, the same official suddenly e-mailed a colleague that he no longer thought the replating was necessary.�
The Pioneer Press have also found fault with MnDOT’s conduct. Their article explores the relationship between Wiss Janney, a firm hired to assist in investigating the collapse, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and MnDOT. The article explores the possible conflict of interest between the parties, as Wiss Janney is also providing technical assistance to the NTSB, one of the parties that Wiss Janney would be expected to investigate. "The NTSB is having to rely on experts hired by the likely responsible party," said Chris Messerly, a Minneapolis attorney representing victims of the collapse.
The Pioneer Press criticizes the NTSB’s “party system� which determines how contracts are given out, but also gives a more pragmatic perspective on the system, which stresses its necessity.
"There is no other realistic alternative," NTSB spokesman Terry Williams said in an e-mail to the Pioneer Press. "... Even if the Board had the fiscal wherewithal to employ sufficient subject matter specialists, there would be no way for the Board to have available at any point in time the specific expertise with a particular product, industry process, or regulatory framework to adequately support the in-depth investigation the agency must conduct for significant accidents."