Concurrent session: Motivation and learning technology

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

They use the ARCS model of instructional design.

Literature review for clickers:

  • Mayer, et al. -- enhance questioning methods
  • Gauci, et al. -- PRS fosters active learning
  • Barbara Petersohn's pilot study -- PRS in library instruction leads to moderate increase in learning outcomes
  • Emily Dill -- cautions against putting too much faith in instructional technology

They use Keller's ARC Model of Motivational Design

Four elements:

  1. Attention: Use the clickers to gain attention early and keep attention going

  2. relevance

  3. confidence: students know what the objectives are and believe in their ability to master the material. Over-confidence can lead to students feeling that the material is not relevant.

  4. satisfaction: students should feel that they should be able to apply what they learned and that it is helpful to them -- this actually valence in an expectancy-valence model.

They are measuring the ARCS motivational outcomes and pre- and post-learning outcomes. They tested ACRL (Assctn College & Research Libraries) literacy standards.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/103689

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jude Higdon published on January 20, 2010 10:08 AM.

Born Digital was the previous entry in this blog.

Using NSSE and FSSE to link technology to student engagement is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.