« January 2006 | Main | March 2006 »

February 27, 2006

Why should we choose Audible.com?

There are so many reasons for one to join Audible.com. With our company joining so many others we are one of the top competitors.
Unlike Itunes, Audible has a larger variety of books including many unabridged versions. Any audiobook you buy remains in my audible.com library. You can re-download it anytime I like, in any number of formats. That means that Stephen King's On Writing that you downloaded onto your PC in December 2000 (and lost when that PC hard drive had a meltdown), can be re-downloaded onto your mac. Now. Next week. Next year. Or in 2008. There are a lot of unabridged titles. Just go the the site and check out the number of unabridged titles available at audible.com. It is phenomenal. An interesting account options, as part of the AudibleListener program. For instance, for $19.95 per month (premium account) you can download any two books (with the exception of a few audio language courses) at no additional cost. A download worth nearly $60 for just the cost of my $19.95 monthly subscription.
Audible.com downloads are also compatible with iTunes and iPods. And, for those iPod owners (like me) who want an mp3 player that will "bookmark" files, audible.com offers a free Otis MP3 player with the premium AudibleListener account.
Audible.com offers many titles at no cost many cotaining C-span content. Audible.com's site is so easy and convenient to use that it would be hard not to try it out.

February 20, 2006

Has anything really changed since Post-Napster?

The biggest issue is the depth of song selection that online music stores will offer. The services still need to figure out complex arrangements to share revenues with a variety of parties, including artists who own their works and music publishers. The record label is also struggling to deal with the legacy of Napster. While the labels have won significant victories so far in court that have defanged their most potent online enemy to date, they have yet to escape Napster's sway.
Despite their legal actions, the recording industry has taken cues from Napster's success to try to replicate its service. Other online companies have jumped on the demand for creating music subscriptions. And most importantly, consumers have woken up to online music's potential.
Participants have pointed out that free music and file sharing remain mercurial and will not go away with the limiting of Napster. Disabling Napster has pushed people to use other free music download services such as Gnutella or Morpheus. The threat from free services still remains. It will be up to the labels to offer people something better than getting free downloads.

February 8, 2006

Will Moore's law ever slow down?

Moore's Law: The number of transistors on a chip would double every two years. The prediction was an elegant statement of how semiconductor chips would become cheaper, faster, smaller and more reliable over time.
"It became an almost religious faith in human ingenuity and a belief in the future," said Carver Mead, the former professor at the California Institute of Technology who coined the term "Moore's Law." "It spoiled everyone into thinking that this would go on forever." By most accounts, Moore's Law will collide with the laws of physics sometime in the next 15 years. That's when it will become physically impossible to squeeze more transistors onto a single silicon chip. Maybe though it will be for the best.
We have become so used to the idea of throwing away our technical efforts every year or two that "long term" has been redefined into absurdity. If Moore's Law was gone, all that would change, and we might find ourselves building data structures of enduring quality. We won't be wearing computers in our jackets, we'll be living in a world that has taken the true potential of computing into its heart. Rather than standing on a street corner asking my jacket to tell me the weather forecast, I'll ask a street light or a parking meter. Anything that has power should become a networked device and as a part of the public infrastructure, should be an entry point to the store of public knowledge.
Think about it. A parking meter as a networked device could be used by hundreds of people per day, which is a heck of a lot more cost-effective than wearing a computer suit. And it wouldn't even be that hard to do. But it won't work at all if we have to buy a new parking meter every 18 months. And that's why I am eager for the end of Moore's Law, for a time when we can stop building gizmos and start using digital technology in an enduring way.
I'm not saying we'll return to the age of building great cathedrals, but at least we'll have the right bricks and mortar should we decide to