The Changing Medium of Media
It's hard to argue that the media has changed significantly, even in the last 5 years. As we can see clearly by Time Magazine's crowning "you" as person(s) of the year, the inception of the internet has had a similar effect on the media has it has on the music industry, in the that it puts the means of production in the hands of viewers. However, in the case of television, things aren't quite as widespread. It seems that something the internet has done across the board is put more control in hands of people rather than forcing consumers and viewers to go through media outlets. It's interesting that these means are brought about at a time when the media seems to be increasingly criticized for its ability to really cover news without regard for corporate or broadcasting interests. It's clearly already had a huge impact with the Saddam Hussein execution video and the UCLA Library tasering incident. Now people are able to find their own news and spread it around, rather than reacting to news presented to them. In this regard, I think the transformations that the media is undergoing are positive ones. It’s interesting to consider how this shift in control to the users will affect media some years down the line.
This is a CNN report about the verichip, an identification device that goes inside beneath your skin and holds identification and medical and various other kinds of information on it. Actually it relates to matters of privacy we mentioned before: all the information is on a website and it doesn't appear things are very secure.It strikes me as kind of offputting, but judge for yourself. There's a lot of videos that contend the chip is for complete control of the nation and may actually be the "mark of the beast" mentioned in the Bible book of Revelations (those seemed pretty heavyhanded, so I posted this one instead).
Comments
I like your comment that about how the Internet has put more control in the hands of ourselves. We have the control of the Internet and we can do so much with it. I also am interested how this control over the media will have an effect on the mass media. Already it has shown it's effects, now the media is asking for videos and news that we have, not what they have. Very interesting, good post
Posted by: Harpal (Paul) Thind | April 18, 2007 05:55 PM
Hi! I can not see your video, but I did a paper on the veri chip last semester and I think it is a really big issue. Because of technology, it really does affect our privacy and other things such as religion, safety, etc. I know there are many of those who think it is secure and a great idea, but I definitely think it can cause a lot of problems, such as health issues.
Posted by: May | April 18, 2007 06:24 PM
I just realized I forgot to actually embed the video. Here it is:
Posted by: tcarr | April 18, 2007 11:34 PM
Apparently I don't know how to embed videos, so here's a link to the YouTube site where my video is found. Sorry for any confusion.
Thanks for the comments. IIn the CNN report they mention a employer who required his employees to get a verichip in order to allow them access to secured areas. I would have serious reservations about doing something like that, and don't imagine I would continue working there. I agree that it could easily be more problematic than it seems.
Posted by: tcarr | April 22, 2007 04:47 PM
Fourth time is a charm. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHPSckL5RDI
Posted by: tcarr | April 22, 2007 06:36 PM