Blog 7

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes
The organizational process of leadership can be affected in many different ways. Leadership in numerous different businesses and organizations can make or break you as a company. There are many different components on how leadership can impact the organizational context. The actors within the organization are the CEO's, GM's and middle management staff that makes up the leadership of the organization. How they act and what they do in their work makes a big difference in how the employees will react and how they will produce for you. If you have a boss that is always riding you and nothing that you say or do makes him happy, then you will have disgruntled employees that do not produce the way they should. On the flip side of the coin if you encourage the workers through free ideas and opinions with an open environment to work and grow, you tend to get much better results than the dictatorship approach. The process of leadership and the culture in which you are born into leadership will always differ from one person to the next. Leadership for some people can be born into and for others they will never know how to lead from the front. The culture in which leadership is born into can change from one country to the next. In other country leadership is much different than in America. In Japan people lead from the front by keeping all emotions in check and they never display hardship or frustration. They do all there leading with their words to get the point across. In America there tends to be much more emotions displayed in leadership, especially when running a major sports team. In Japan the manager does not yell or get upset when his team makes a mistake, however when the player comes into the dugout after a bad play the manager will sit him down with a stern talking to in order to get his point across that the player made a mistake and that it will not be tolerated again. The structure of leadership within an organization can be vital in making leadership decisions. The army is structured in such a way that there are many levels of leadership going all the way up to the President of the United States. In this form of environment you can have lots of confusion because of all the different leaders that you have to answer to within your day to day decisions. Overall leadership is a critical aspect to running a sports organization and without good leadership, your organization can fail.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/97213

3 Comments

| Leave a comment

I think you make some great points about leadership, Bryan. I was especially interested in the example you provided about the differences in Japanese and American baseball managers acting as leaders. As a future baseball coach, I have been trying to find my personal style of leadership. I've tried being coercive and have seen very negative results. Instead of this type of leadership motivating my players, it made them scared and tense up whenever they were at practice and it resulted in more errors, poor communication and general timidness. This past summer I found that a delicate balance between coerciveness and creating a relaxed atmosphere had better results on and off of the field. The players respected me more, worked harder, and were generally much happier. Although I feel that this style of leadership can be applied to any situation, I do firmly believe that one must develop their leadership style based upon the circumstances in order to achieve maximum effectiveness.

Bryan, you have some interesting points made about leadership. I think you are right on when you stated that leadership can make or break an organization. There have been numerous examples throughout society and you touched on some of them. It is often common for leadership to change like you said. I think when leadership changes, it is often because the organization is not experiencing the desired success. If a new leadership style is brought in, changes are made because things were not good when that person got there. An example I always use is the Minnesota Timberwolves. Under McHale, changes obviously need to be made, and they were finally prior to this season by the hiring of David Kahn. I like your example of the army because I would believe that to be true, the more leaders you have to go through to get to the top, the more confusing it could possibly be.

There were many different aspects that Bryan discussed in this blog about leadership. I thought the part where he commented on the different leadership styles between Japanese and American coaches in baseball was very interesting. Where did you get this information Bryan? It is very true that different environments require different leadership styles, and the wrong leader can take down the organization. When Joel Maturi came in to discuss the merger the U of M experienced, it became very apparent he was the right person for the job of merging the two departments. He is stern in his decision making, but is very willing to listen to others viwepoints to make the best decision possible for the Athletic Department.

Leave a comment