September 14, 2004

Bush Administration and the ANWR

The Bush administration is once again pushing for oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Sure, this spot of land is one of the most remote areas of earth, but it is also one of the increasingly few pristine wildernesses. Nothing in the name "wildlife refuge" implies that it is being set aside to be used as oil. Dick Cheney was quoted as saying '"we are at the mercy of international oil prices" because "we've taken large chunks of this country and put it off-limits to any kind of exploration or development"' (newsweek sept 20th 2004). To me, it seems like there is a REASON these places are off limits to drilling. You wouldn't think of drilling in yellowstone, home of one of the last great herds of American Bison. The arctic refuge is like yellowstone, its home to one of the last large herds of caribou in the world. The swamps and coastal plains are used as breeding grounds. The proposed oil plant would be placed right in the middle of this, much like a Prudhoe Bay, another former wildlife haven. The ANWR has been compared to the serengheti plains in africa in its abundance of wildlife. It is home to bears, wolves, and many other animals. Our president wants to throw all this away, risking the destruction of one of america's last undisturbed wildernesses, all so that we can have cheap gas. Perhaps all this money would be better put to use finding alternative sources of energy, instead of killing off herds of animals to power everyone's cars.

Posted by weav0097 at September 14, 2004 05:55 PM | TrackBack
Comments

I completely agree with this post regarding the ANWR. I feel as if we have all forgotten what is important and money is the only priority in this country. Drilling for oil in our nation's most sacred and beautiful land is absolutely absurd. I believe that if the majority of the people do not regret destroying as much wildlife as we already have, someday they will. This administration, and the destruction of our nation's wildlife needs to come to an end.

Posted by: Tory at September 16, 2004 11:31 AM

It is obvious that the oil supply is decreasing too fast and pushing prices of gas way up. Why are we trying to find other means of obtaining it? What we should concentrate on is finding alternative ways of transportation. Americans burn up fuel at tremendous rates. Public transportation should be better taken advantage of. In the Twin Cities, public transportation is getting better. This would decrease the traffic and also road matinance. I realize that people love to have the luxery of driving their cars on their own schedules to work every day. The environment also needs to be taken into consideration, not just comfort and egos.

Posted by: Hallie at September 16, 2004 04:17 PM

Well if the car companies, government, etc. would all just get off their butts and put all these new inventions into mass production, we wouldn't have to worry about oil dependence OR protecting the environment! Hybrid vehicles and fuel-cell vehicles are a clean and effecient alternative to regular, messy gasoline, but for some reason they aren't put to good use. And there's this machine that converts any carbon-based substance into oil (not petroleum though, unfortunately) but they aren't being used to transform all our trash into useful oil! The landfills just keep filling up. I don't know, but people just seem less motivated these days.

Posted by: Joel Gardner at September 16, 2004 09:46 PM

I quite disagree with you comments on the drilling of oil in secluded areas. Do you go anywhere in a car and see that you need gas? Then you pull up to the pump and pay over 2 dollars a gallon for you vehicle? 50 years ago, it was considerd expensive for gas to be over 50 cents. It is quite unnecessary for us as the consumers to be paying large amounts on money for gas when we have a large abundent supply.
I would support the drilling yellowstone for oil. That would be a terrific idea, I never thought of that! The animals there are not really wild at all. In fact, the bison herds are not wild at all. If you know about ranching, the farmers brand their cattle, in this case bison, to claim ownership. All the bison are woned by someone and are sold for meat and other by products. The governemt would get the profit out of the drilling of Yellowstone, bcause they own it. Couldn't they use the money to help pay for this large deficit anyways?
No one I know really cares if there are big oil pumps in the ANWR, because no one lives there. God put resorses on this planet for a reason. For us to use them WISELY. Wisely is also the key word. We shouldn't just waste them or let them sit when we need them.

Posted by: Beth Sandager at September 17, 2004 08:41 PM

ooh the previous comment makes me so angry, but i guess that is the purpose of the blog, so great.

if we drill in the ANWR, we will still be mostly dependent on foreign oil, and therefore, being at the mercy of OPEC and that wont help the high oil price situation.

Oil is not an energy source that is easily renewed. So why should we destroy one of the few pristine places that we have left for a short term benefit?

Yellowstone is a very public place. in order to make money, they have made it easy for tourists to visit there. Maby thats why the bison are all owned- because it is so public- that is what is so great about THIS wildlife refuge- the animals are WILD. and reason why we should keep it the way it is.

no one cares if they put oil pumps in the ANWR because no one lives there???????????

i care. and i know there are a whole lot of people out there who care. alot. because the decisions that are made now affect the future. and i am willing to pay a few extra dollars at the gas pump, if i know that my government isnt destroying a prisitine place in order for others to save some extra bucks filling up thier escalades.

Posted by: Karyn Jones at September 19, 2004 11:04 PM

The whole Artic drilling is a sensitive subject, however, know one even knows for sure what is there. There is a very slim chance that anything is even going to be drilled there because those who think there is a vast amount of oil there are over estimating, while those who think there is no oil there are underestimating.

Nonetheless, oil drilling is a very expensive and tedious process. It is not easy to do and we would have to be even more desperate for oil than we are now to start drilling there.

As far as it being this pristine virgin land of bears and happy animals...im afraid that isnt completely the case. While yes, some of this refuge is inhabited by animals the VAST MAJORITY is bare tundra.

Im all about preserving what little pristine land we have and would hate to see habitats destroyed. However, until alternative energy sources can be utilize, to hell with vast tundra, drill away....just do it in a way where the least enviromental impact is done to the current inhabitants of the land.

Joseph Goss

Posted by: Joseph Goss at September 21, 2004 12:54 PM

The only problem with this is that the spot that will be used for drilling is the coastal plain, the same coastal plain that the caribou herd uses for breeding. so really the drilling WOULD be right on top of the birthing grounds

Posted by: Weav0097 at September 22, 2004 04:49 PM

SAME HERE!!!!!!!wohooo

Posted by: Billie Joe>>green day at April 7, 2005 11:50 AM

Well, the bastards are already drilling for natural gas on Padre Island National Seashore. This involves running multi-ton trucks over the last nesting grounds of the Kemp's Ridley sea turtle, the most endangered of all the sea turtles. Forty trucks a day across formerly virgin seashore. And for what you might ask? A single day's supply of natural gas.

Yep, Yellowstone is next, since ANWR is mostly a publicity stunt to establish precendent. (Google "DeLay ANWR" and see what you come up with.)

Posted by: BillG at April 18, 2005 04:55 PM

Ok..... fine

Posted by: Jonathan Garcia at May 9, 2005 01:57 AM

Let's vote in the Senate to drill in ANWR before election day!

Posted by: SIDNEY GOLDBLATT md at September 30, 2006 12:23 AM

I live in 22541 Las Vegas, Nevada. Have you been here before?

Posted by: Ein Lo Sechel at October 4, 2006 07:30 AM

hey i think the site is great a lot of infor was supplyed on the topic to drill or not to drill!! thanks

Posted by: Erika at October 12, 2006 02:26 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.