<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Midwifery Study Group</title>
      <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.25</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
	
         <title>Jen&apos;s pelvis info</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><br />
http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/pelvis.asp </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/03/jens_pelvis_info.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/03/jens_pelvis_info.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Who attends births in the US?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a report of the most recent data from the National Center for Health Statistics. It gives info on % c-sections, % inductions, % births attended by midwives, % births attended by physicians, % births in hosptial/out of hosptial ... Rebecca, this is where I got that 8% of births attended by midwives figure. Midwife-attended births tend to be under-reported and vary by region, but the numbers are still pretty low. What else? 99 percent of births take place in hospitals and that percentage has been consistent for DECADES! Ugh! </p>

<p><a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/Birth%20in%20US%20-%202004%20data%20from%20NCHS.pdf">Download file</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/who_attends_births_in_the_us.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/who_attends_births_in_the_us.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>National Women&apos;s Studies Association Journal</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a journal we might consider for publishing a short article about our study group ... <br />
<a href="http://www.nwsaj.engl.iastate.edu/">http://www.nwsaj.engl.iastate.edu/</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/national_womens_studies_associ.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/national_womens_studies_associ.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Article from spinning babies website</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>http://www.greenjournal.org/cgi/reprint/105/5/974</p>

<p>It is on op babies and epidurals and subsequently on c-sections. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/article_from_spinning_babies_w.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/article_from_spinning_babies_w.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 02:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Pregnancy and Prenatal</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Some topics from <em>Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth</em> (2003, pp. 183-203) that we might want to use to organize our discussion:</strong></p>

<p>•	Nutrition</p>

<p>•	Ultrasound</p>

<p>•	Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS)</p>

<p>•	Amniocentesis</p>

<p>•	Maternal Serum Alpha-fetoprotein Screening</p>

<p>•	Gestational Diabetes</p>

<p>•	Screening for Beta Strep (Group B Streptococcus)</p>

<p>•	Prenatal Rhogam</p>

<p>•	Informed Consent</p>

<p><strong>Some topics from Elizabeth Davis’ <em>Heart and Hands</em> (2004, pp. 11-64) – another way to organize our discussion ...</strong></p>

<p><u>Initial Interview</u><br />
•	What does this look like? <br />
•	What are the goals of this meeting? </p>

<p><u>Medical History </u><br />
Can we find some medical history forms to look at? <br />
•	Obstetrical history <br />
•	Abortion history<br />
•	Gynecological history<br />
•	Contraceptive history<br />
•	Family history – cancer, hypertension, diabetes, cancer ... <br />
•	Other – bleeding, spotting, flu-like symptoms, chicken pox, herpes, vomiting, fatigue, urinary tract problems, vaginal discharge, meds (prescription and OTC), household or workplace chemicals</p>

<p><u>Physical Exam</u><br />
Other resources – <em>Varney’s Midwifery</em> or <em>Holistic Midwifery</em> (Vol.1) <br />
•	Estimated Date of Birth<br />
* Ways to calculate this? <br />
*Bimanual exam</p>

<p>•	Weight</p>

<p>•	BP</p>

<p>•	Pulse</p>

<p>•	Temp</p>

<p>•	Reflexes</p>

<p>•	Breast Exam</p>

<p>•	Pelvic Assessment<br />
* consider rape/sexual abuse history – see Simkin’s <em>When Survivors Give Birth</em></p>

<p>•	Pelvimetry (pp. 23-28)<br />
*becoming a lost art (p. 28)<br />
*see also Frye’s <em>Holistic Midwifery</em> (Vol. II)</p>

<p>•	Fundal height</p>

<p>•	Assessing gestational age</p>

<p>•	Fetal stuff - uterine/fetal palpation, Leopold’s maneuvers, fetal lie, fetal position, presentation, attitude, fetal heart tones<br />
* lost midwifery arts of pelvic assessment, fetal and uterine palpation, fetal heart auscultation, fundal height assessment – almost all replaced by ultrasound (p. 30)</p>

<p><u>Nutrition and Exercise</u></p>

<p><u>Screening Out</u><br />
<u><br />
Lab Work and much more ... <br />
</u></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/pregnancy_and_prenatal.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/pregnancy_and_prenatal.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Historical Look at Childbirth in the US, 1750-1975</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This figure show all sorts of things in the history of US childbirth - % midwife attended births over time, % hospital births over time, % of births using anesthesia ... Figure from: </p>

<p>Leavitt, Judith Walzer. 1986. <em>Brought to Bed: Childbearing in America 1750 to 1950</em>. New York: Oxford University Press.</p>

<p><a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/Historical%20Look%20at%20Childbirth%20in%20the%20US.doc">Download file</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/historical_look_at_childbirth.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/historical_look_at_childbirth.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Midwife-Attended Birth in the U.S. and Netherlands, 1940-2000</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This figure shows % of births that were midwife-attended in US and NL between 1940 and 2000. Figure from: </p>

<p>De Vries, Raymond. 2004. <em>A Pleasing Birth: Midwives and Maternity Care in the Netherlands. </em>Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.</p>

<p><a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/Midwife-Attended%20Births%20in%20US%20and%20NL.doc">Download file</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/midwifeattended_birth_in_the_u.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/midwifeattended_birth_in_the_u.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Home Births in the U.S. and the Netherlands, 1955-2000</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a figure shows % home births in the US and NL from 1955-2000. Figure from:<br />
 <br />
De Vries, Raymond. 2004. <em>A Pleasing Birth: Midwives and Maternity Care in the Netherlands.</em> Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.<br />
<a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/Home%20Births%20in%20the%20US%20and%20NL.doc">Download file</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/home_births_in_the_us_and_the.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/home_births_in_the_us_and_the.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>British Medical Journal Article</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is the best article of its kind looking at home birth outcomes in the U.S. and Canada. </p>

<p><a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/Planned%20Home%20Birth%20in%20US%20and%20Canada%20-%20BMJ.pdf">Download file</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/british_medical_journal_articl.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/british_medical_journal_articl.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Maternity Care in the Netherlands in 2002: Place of Birth and Attendant</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/Dutch%20transfer%20figure%20-%20Wiegers%202006.doc">Download file</a></p>

<p><strong>Explanation of figure<br />
</strong><br />
<em>At the beginning of pregnancy</em><br />
79.2% of women in the Netherlands under the care of a midwife (generally on track for a home birth)<br />
6.5% under the care of a general practitioner (generally on track for a home birth)<br />
14.3% under the care of a OB/gyn (on track for a hospital birth)</p>

<p><em>During pregnancy</em><br />
26.1% transfer from midwife to OB/gyn care<br />
2.2% transfer from GP to OB.gyn care<br />
now a total of:<br />
•	53.1% under midwifery care<br />
•	4.3% under GP care<br />
•	42.6% under OB/gyn care</p>

<p><em>During labor</em><br />
15.7% transfer from midwife to OB/gyn care<br />
1.1% transfer from GP to OB/gyn care<br />
now a total of: <br />
•	37.4% under midwifery care<br />
•	3.2% under GP care<br />
•	59.4% under OB/gyn care</p>

<p><em>Place of birth and attendant</em><br />
Total home births: 29.4%<br />
•	26.6% at home with a midwife<br />
•	2.8% at home with a GP</p>

<p>Total hospital births: 70.6%<br />
•	10.8% with a midwife<br />
•	0.4% with a GP<br />
•	59.4% with an OB/gyn</p>

<p>Data from:<br />
Wiegers, Trees and B. M. Janssen. 2006. Monitor Verloskundige Zorgverlening: Eindrapport [Monitoring Midwifery Care: End Report]. Utrecht, Netherlands: NIVEL.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/maternity_care_in_the_netherla_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/maternity_care_in_the_netherla_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Dutch List of Obstetrical Indications</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This is the (very long) list that the national midwifery and ob/gyn organizations in the Netherlands came up with to determine when and under what conditions a woman should be transfered from midwifery to OB care and visa versa . </p>

<p><a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/Dutch%20OB%20Indications.doc">Download file</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/dutch_list_of_obstetrical_indi.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/kuli0015/studygroup/2007/02/dutch_list_of_obstetrical_indi.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
