« Steve's favorite channels | Main | The Piano »

Beauty Standards

The other day in class, we discussed what both men and women are judged on and the “Normative Gender Expectation�. We compared the emotion and nurturing traits of women to the hard, “stone walled� traits of men. Although we discussed many more commonalities and difference between the two genders, the topic that I felt generated the most debate among the class was on the topic of body and beauty standards.

One female student spoke quite passionately on how much of what we judge women on is based on there outward appearance. She claimed that only the women that the media deems as attractive get on television and put on magazine covers. She added that men don’t have to deal with the same standards and expectations of beauty as women.

Another male student spoke up to counter his classmate’s view on men and beauty. He argued that men can face just as harsh criticisms on their appearance and style as women. He remarked that in major metropolitan cities such as Los Angeles and other high fashion places, men are judged by their look just as much as the women.

I felt that there was truth to what the students had to say and then a bit of exaggeration on both parts. I would like to break the concept of “beauty� and “style� down so we could get a clearer idea of where each student was coming from.

One point we as a class discussed was the concept of body composition. It was said that women in films are supposed to be tall, thin, and slim. This then works its way into society until all women are want to fit that particular image. Well, if you exclude the tall part, all women have it within themselves to be fit and in shape, although it often varies from person to person on the exact description of “fit�. This point is wrong because there are many female actors both in movies and in television that are not slim, or fit at all. Why? Because television shows and movies try to mimic real life (duh!). Most people do not have perfect bodies, that being, a majority of movie and show casts are made up of people with all body types. Just look at such shows as “The Office� or movies like “My Big Fat Greek Wedding�.

Now magazines are different. On the cover of most popular magazines today you will see someone who is an example of perfection: their body seems flawless. Why? Because generally, if you’re reading Cosmo or other fashion magazines, their main message is about being healthy and in shape. Why would you put someone on your cover who doesn’t fit the theme or message of the literature? It wouldn’t fit. It’s the same way in every magazine whether it’s directed towards women or not. You wouldn’t put a clown on the front of a bridal magazine, nor would you put a runner on the cover of a body builder magazine.

Standards for men aren’t that much different from women’s. I read a magazine called Men’s Health and I can honestly say I’ve never seen a guy on the cover without a “6-pack�. The fact is, men face the same criticisms.
Where women are expected to be thin and slim, men are expected to be strong and athletic. Where women are expected to where make-up, men are expected to be clean shaven or have well groomed facial hair.

On the topic of clothing and attire, I would argue that men have it harder than women. When it comes to trying to look attractive or professional most women could get away with a nice dress and some fancy heels. Jewelry aside, a man’s wardrobe is much more complicated and expensive. A typical male has to wear a sport coat, slacks, a button-down, collared shirt and a pair of leather shoes in order to look professional.

Although standards might be similar for both sexes, it’s the females that we see more frequently used in commercials and movie previews. Attractive females appear more often than men in the media because they hold sex appeal for males and they can relate to women. Men are used less because it’s often other males that are the target audience and males want to see girls. I believe the reason why it seems females are judged more on their looks than males is because we see images of what the women shown in the media more than the men.

We live in a society that values attractive people, it’s quite simple. Standards are high for both sexes because we set them high. We are the ones who decide what’s in, what’s out. What’s attractive and what’s not. We all want to be attractive towards the opposite sex (or same sex). If we didn’t want to appeal towards one and other our standards would be much more relaxed.

Comments

I agree with you to a certain extent, in that both men and women are judged by their appearance. And being attractive does help both genders in advancing in their careers. However, you only have to look at the way men and women are treated when they age to really start seeing how much more women are judged than men. Men can get grey hair, wrinkles etc, and it shows character and a welcome maturity. Women cannot - they must look young (wrinkle free, no grey hair etc). I'm not saying men aren't judged (the increase in body related psychological issues suffered by some men proves this), but only that women are indeed judged more.

Thanks for all the info very interesting reading !

I don't think we can get away from the fact that we judge people by the way they look. Our society does support this. The question remains: How do we go about changing the standards? And do we want to change those standards?

Thanks for some food for thought...

That's true. We always judge a person by their look. Would you like to marry a beautiful wife or handsome husband in this life? We are geared towards what makes us happy - look and society. Your info is worth reading. Thanks.

I agree to some extent that all of us practice what our society believes in. Society has set some rigid standards for women as compared to men as far as their beauty is concerned. Beautiful women feature more in movie, media and in glamour world because of their sex appeal and they can easily connect to women in general.

I don't think we can get away from the fact that we judge people by the way they look. Our society does support this. The question remains: How do we go about changing the standards? And do we want to change those standards?

Thanks for some food for thought...

This is a great observation!

You state: "We live in a society that values attractive people, it’s quite simple. Standards are high for both sexes because we set them high. We are the ones who decide what’s in, what’s out. What’s attractive and what’s not. We all want to be attractive towards the opposite sex (or same sex). If we didn’t want to appeal towards one and other our standards would be much more relaxed."

I can assure you that most people who manage magazines like Cosmo, Vogue, In Style, Bazaar do NOT look anything like the models they cast.

Most models and most celebrities look quite plain without their cast of super-stylists and if it was not to the MAGIC of air brushing and lighting most of these films, TV shows and magazine would actually reveal what these people really look like.

Most of them are ordinary…trust me.

The only way to be attractive to the outside world in my opinion is to be attractive to yourself!

I’m not a model anymore (ok, I used to be one when I was younger), but I can tell you that I feel like I look sexier now than I ever did and when I look in the mirror I see the real me…devoid of artifice…just the pretty me.

That’s how we need to see ourselves and not let the media tell us what’s hot and what’s not!

Gisele

Very interesting post. Thanks.

I can't imagine a time when people won't be judged (at least to a certain extent) on how they look. It is sad and shallow, but it is human nature to judge.

I also do agree with the above comment that this issue does affect women more than men.

Hi great post. Society definitely puts too much weight on beauty. We look at the t.v. and think we have to look a certain way to be accepted. thanks for the post. i look forward to more.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.