April 29, 2009

Introduction

According to the CDC, more than 300,000 sport-related concussions are reported every year (1). However, due to lack of recognition of the signs and symptoms of concussion, upwards of an estimated 3.8 million sport-related concussions occur every year (2). The largest burden of injury falls upon adolescents and children. Continuing neurological development predisposes this age group to a greater risk of traumatic brain injury. Sports is second only to motor vehicle crashes as the most common cause of traumatic brain injury in individuals ages 15-24 (3).

The Neurological Surgeons of America define a concussion as “a clinical syndrome characterized by immediate and transient post-traumatic impairment of neural functions, such as alteration of consciousness, disturbance of vision or equilibrium due to brain stem involvement” (1). Concussions occur in varying degrees and may differ in noticeable symptoms. The brain floats in protective cerebrospinal fluid. Under normal conditions, this fluid protects the brain from colliding with the skull. However, a sudden, forceful impact can cause the brain to make contact with the skull, possibly leading to bleeding in or around the brain or nerve fiber damage (4).

getImage.aspx.jpeg
Image: MD Consult

It is difficult to identify trends in concussion rates because this injury often goes unnoticed and unrecognized. The number of concussions reported today is probably far greater than a decade ago because of education programs that have increased awareness and, thus, reporting of concussions. On rare occasions, fatalities can occur as the result of second impact syndrome (SIS). SIS occurs when a concussion goes unnoticed, and the individual suffers “a second head injury before symptoms associated with the first have fully cleared” (5). Brain herniation and coma or death can follow. Like concussion, SIS is associated with adolescent age. However, few cases have been reviewed in the literature, and data on fatality trends is unavailable.

feat-coaches-concussion.jpg
Image: USA Hockey Magazine

Variables

As previously discussed, age is an important variable in the occurrence and severity of concussion. In adolescent sports, the incidence of concussion is highest in football and ice hockey. This is likely due to the fact that both of these sports involve high impact contact between players. Concussions represent 8% to 11% of all football injuries and 12% of all ice hockey injuries (6). These sports are followed by soccer, wrestling, basketball, field hockey, baseball, softball, and volleyball in terms of incidence of concussion (7). In football specific positions played are also associated with concussion risk.

Genetics may also play a role in susceptibility to concussion. A gene that encodes a class of lipid transport proteins in brain cells has been found to be associated with severity of traumatic brain injury. However, this gene has yet to be shown to predispose individuals to a higher risk of concussion (8). If such a link was found, though, it may be possible to identify high-risk athletes and monitor them more closely.

Gender is also related to the incidence of concussion in adolescent athletes. A study of adolescent soccer players demonstrated that females are more likely to suffer a concussion than males (9). However, the authors did not comment on a possible reason for this. Perhaps the different pace of development in females versus males could account for some of this discrepancy. Research also suggests that symptoms following concussion may also differ in males and females (6).

Protective headgear is also an important variable. Although such headgear cannot entirely prevent concussion, helmets designed with specifically targeting padding have been found to be particularly protective against concussion in adolescents. Luckily, such equipment is standard in high contact sports, such as rugby and football, but other sports, such as soccer, could also benefit from adopting these safety precautions.

Costs

There is currently no estimate of the full economic toll of sport-related concussion in adolescents. However, it is clear that the costs stretch from the individual into the greater society. A sport-related concussion is an acute injury that can have lasting effects and lead to permanent disability. To the injured individual, this means lost productivity, as well as mental and emotional costs that cannot be measured. As an adolescent, this injury is also costly to the parents. Even a mild concussion may require the parent to miss work in order to bring their child to medical and rehabilitation appointments. A more severe concussion with lasting effects could require even more time, perhaps even full-time care by the parent.

Following a concussion, the individual may require special attention at school. Also, the medical and rehabilitation care is a cost to insurance and requires the time of health care professionals. Considering that this injury occurs more frequently in a young age group, it is difficult to assess how great the long-term cost to society may be. Adolescents are about to enter the prime of life. In serious situations, this injury could result in a lifetime of productive work and contribution to society lost.

Prevention and Control Strategies

The Haddon Matrix (below) is a useful tool for organizing the factors involved in sport-related concussion and identifying possible interventions. This matrix takes into consideration the three phases of injury: pre-injury, at the point of injury, and post-injury. It also considers factors of the human player, the vehicle, which is the other player that delivers the blow, and the physical and socio-economic environment. This matrix was mainly developed to represent adolescent football, but it could be applied to other adolescent contact sports, too.

Haddon Matrix.jpg

Haddon also identified ten strategies for determining approaches to injury prevention. These strategies can be applied to sport-related concussion in adolescents as follows:

1. Prevent the creation of the hazard in the first place.
Prohibit all contact sports among adolescents.

2. Reduce the amount of the hazard brought into being.
Use legislation to restrict age groups that are allowed to participate in contact sports.

3. Prevent the release of the hazard that already exists.
Allow traditional contact sports to only be played as non-contact sports (e.g. touch football).


4. Modify the rate or spatial distribution of release of the hazard from its source.
Modify sports to eliminate high-risk, forceful contact between players.

5. Separate, in time or space, the hazard and that which is to be protected.
Only allow certain types of contact, avoiding contact that is likely to deliver a blow to the head or result in sudden movement of the neck.

6. Separate the hazard and that which is to be protected by interposition of a material barrier.
Enforce use of advanced helmet technology and continue to develop effective protective gear.

7. Modify basic relevant qualities of the hazard.
Only allow adolescents of similar sizes to play contact sports together.

8. Make what is to be protected more resistant to damage from hazard.
Incorporate neck muscle strengthening exercises into team workouts, and teach players the safest posture and position to take at time of impact.

9. Begin to counter the damage already done by the environmental hazard.
Ensure that players, coaches, and athletic trainers recognize the symptoms in order for the injured player to receive immediate medical attention, rather than return to the game.

10. Stabilize, repair, and rehabilitate the object of the damage.
Enroll the injured player in rehabilitation care to address cognitive deficits from the injury.

Despite the risk of concussion, it is unlikely that parents, adolescents, and schools would be willing to eliminate contact sports or even adjust them through age restrictions or adjustments to the rules. Due to the nature of sports like soccer and football, it would also be difficult to control the types of contact that occur because the velocities and masses of players cannot be controlled. Therefore, strategies six, eight, nine, and ten are likely to be the most appropriate and feasible.

Much of the current literature on sport-related concussion stresses the importance of strategy nine, education to recognize concussions, rather than focusing on preventing the injury from occurring. The “Heads Up” program was developed in 2004. This program seeks to educate coaches, players, and parents about the risks and signs of concussion (1). However, since the inception of this program, no assessment has been done to determine its effectiveness. Such data would be useful to guide future educational programs.

heads_up_football_3.gif
Image: CDC

Education can be supplemented by equipping teams with tools to properly assess suspected concussions. Moorhead High School implemented a software program called ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) that allows coaches, trainers, and physicians to make educated decisions about return to play calls (10). Using the software, each athlete completes neurocognitive tests at the beginning of each season to create a baseline score. Following an injury, the player retakes this test, and his or her scores are compared to the baseline to assess whether a concussion has occurred.

concussion_head.gif
Image: ImPACT

Studies have found that protective headgear may prevent concussions in head-to-head collisions (9). Helmets and other forms of protective headgear are not entirely effective because they protect the skull and brain from direct contact, but cannot protect the brain from contact with the skull. For instance, an individual wearing a helmet who suffers a violent blow to the head will be protected from fracture of the skull, but may still move their head in a manner that allows the brain to collide with the skull.

However, new technology is being developed to better design helmets for protecting against concussion. Riddell produced an advanced helmet with extra padding on the side of the head and around the face. A study of this technology found that use of this helmet reduced the incidence of concussion in high school football players (11). This research represents the importance of strategy six. Although this technology cannot entirely prevent concussion, the significance of reducing the incidence of concussion cannot be ignored. It would be useful to expand upon this research by testing whether adding protection to the neck, thus lessening sudden motions of the head, would also reduce the incidence of concussion.

Strategy eight, which would incorporate neck muscle strengthening exercises into team workouts, as well as teach safe contact postures, would make seek to make the player’s body more resistant to damage. In suggesting this strategy it is assumed that neck strength and player posture are associated with the motion of the head and neck upon contact. More research should be done to determine the strength of this association and whether such a strategy would be effective.

Strategy ten, rehabilitation of the injured player, is important for assessing when it is appropriate for the adolescent to return to play. Coaches often attempt to make rushed sideline calls regarding possible concussions, but given the risk of subsequent injury to concussed players it is crucial to make sure that the player is fully rehabilitated before returning to play. Although there is no treatment for concussion, rehabilitating the player should include assessing their memory and other cognitive functions. This can allow for accommodations to made at school and for appropriate return to play calls to be made.

Education is the best means for controlling the effects of concussion following the injury. The downside of this strategy is that it requires active participation of players, coaches, and athletic trainers. However, concussions can be well treated when recognized and are far more dangerous when they go undetected. Especially for school-aged adolescents, the effects on memory and concentration can be quite prominent in the classroom environment. Also, individuals who have experienced a concussion are far more likely to experience a second concussion.

Limiting Factors

Currently seventeen grading systems for measuring the severity of concussions exist. Numerous symptoms and varying understanding of this injury has resulted in unclear guidelines regarding assessment of concussions. Although sophisticated computer-based tests for cognitive damage exist, it is not feasible to use such test on the sidelines due to time and money constraints. However, fine-tuning this grading system will be necessary for immediately, uniformly identifying and addressing this injury.

Equipping more teams with tools like ImPACT could improve post-injury care. However, access to this technology is limited due to cost. More accessible assessment tools that do not rely on computers should be developed to increase identification of concussions. Also, coaches and physicians should be educated about the importance of reporting concussions. Many concussions go unreported, which makes data regarding concussion incidence less useful.

Although there is data on the number of reported adolescent sport-related concussions, there is no data available regarding concussion rates. Collecting such data would require a complex system to assess all adolescents participating in sports. It would also require uniform and accurate reporting of concussions. Unfortunately, both the difficulty of collecting this data and the underreporting of concussions limit determining true concussion rates among adolescents. Even upon implementing prevention programs, it is difficult to assess their effects without such rates.

More research still needs to be done to better understand concussions (12). Throughout the medical literature numerous definitions of concussion exist. Also, it is often presumed that concussion symptoms appear immediately, but some evidence suggests that in certain cases signs may not appear until more time has lapsed. Assuming that signs appear quickly could result in flawed return to play calls. More research to better understand all of the possible effects and signs of concussions will result in better identification, reporting, and treatment of concussions.

Conclusion

Some of the factors that have limited progress in this field are the public’s perception of sport-related concussions and attitudes toward competitive sports. Many people see a ding to the head in a contact sport, such as high school football, as a normal occurrence. They consider it an “accident” that should happen every so often. This lax attitude toward a preventable and potentially dangerous injury is not conducive to efforts that promote improved protective gear and education. Secondly, in all sports, most spectators and many coaches support players “shaking off” an injury. It is considered honorable to “take one for the team” and “get back in the game.” However, these attitudes are very unsafe when considering an athlete with a concussion. Athletes absorb these attitudes and may not report concussion symptoms in order to please coaches and fans. This puts athletes at a great risk of exacerbating the injury.

Public knowledge of the seriousness of sport-related concussion among adolescents must be improved in order for education and protective gear to be most effectively promoted. At an age where cognitive development is crucial, it is especially critical to protect adolescents from neurological damage. Continued research into the risk factors for concussions, successful educational programs, and valuable protective gear must be done in order to make progress in the prevention and control of this injury. Adolescents are not likely to stop playing these high-risk sports any time soon; thus, it is the role of injury prevention and control professionals to lessen that risk

References

1. Theye, F., and Mueller, K.A. (2004). “Heads up”: concussions in high school sports. Clinical Medicine & Research, 2(3), 165-171.

2. Denke, N.J. (2008). Brain injury in sports. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 34(4), 363-364.

3. Gessel, L.M., Fields, S.K., Collins, C.L., Dick, R.W., Comstock, R.D. (2007). Concussions among United States high school and collegiate athletes. Journal of Athletic Training, 42(4), 495-503.

4. Mayo Clinic. (2009). Concussion basics. Accessed on April 1, 2009.

5. Russo Buzzini, S.R., and Guskiewicz, K.M. (2006). Sport-related concussion in the young athlete. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 18, 376-382.

6. Meehan III, W.P., and Bachur, R.G. (2009). Sport-related concussion. Pediatrics, 123(1), 114-121.

7. Kirkwood, M.W., Yeates, K.O., and Wilson, P.E. (2006). Pediatric sport-related concussion: a review of the clinical management of an oft-neglected population. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1359-1369.

8. Kristman, V.L., Tator, C.H., Kreiger, N., Richards, D., Mainwaring, L., Jaglal, S., Tomlinson, G., and Comper, P. (2008). Does the apolipoprotein ε4 allele predispose varsity athletes to concussion? A prospective cohort study. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 18(4), 322-328.

9. Delaney, J.S., Al-Kashmiri, A., Drummond, R., and Correa, J.A. (2008). The effect of protective headgear on head injuries and concussions in adolescent football (soccer) players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42, 110-115.

10. Peota, C. (2006). School of hard knocks. Minnesota Medicine, 89(3), 10-12.

11. Collins, M., Lovell, M.R., Iverson, G.L., Ide, T., and Maroon, J. (2006). Examining concussion rates and return to play in high school football players wearing newer helmet technology: a three-year prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery, 58(2), 275-286.

12. Lovell, M.R., Collins, M.W., Iverson, G.L., Johnston, K.M., and Bradley, J.P. (2004). Grade 1 or “ding” concussions in high school athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 32(1), 47-54.

Related Links

CDC - Heads Up: Concussion in High School Sports


ImPACT Concussion Software

Mayo Cinic - Concussion Basics