Analysis on structures
I thought the reporter summarized the important elements of the story well, not letting them too much for the reader to handle. They were clear and easy to read and understand, and also didn't make me feel like I had to slow down to understand the story.
The reporter organized the story well, with the lead in the first paragraph. The next four paragraphs gave all the neccessary supporting details to the story and quotes from people around the scene. Then the story end with a few paragraphs of information that is nice to know, but not really essential to the story. There is a clear break in the story on what part is the briefing of the story and what are the extra things added in.
I thought the way the story was structured was very effective since it flowed really well and gave the most important information right away. I don't think I would have structured the story different because the only thing I would maybe change would be the chronology used in the story, but I think that this was one story inparticular where the chronology was nice. In other stories it might have come too soon but I think it fit well in this case.
The story I used is available at http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/30/phoenix.airport.death/index.html