Manitoba or Manhattan

Manitoba or Manhattan

The Access to Destinations Conference, which I helped organize was just completed. It brought together 30 researchers from 5 continents to discuss the theory and practice of questions related to Accessibility. Accessibility is a measure of the ease of reaching destinations, and is contrasted with mobility, which simply measures the ease of use of the network. Accessibility and congestion and related phenomena, but not identical. The ability to move faster on the network generally improves both accessibility and congestion. However, accessibility accounts for land use, while mobility measures don't. Manitoba is an example of a place with no congestion, and very low accessibility. Manhattan, on the other hand, has a great deal of congestion and a slow network, but also a great deal of accessibilty, many places can be reached in a very short time.

A book with the proceedings should be out in 2005.

Article in Minnesota Daily - November 9, 2004

Conference Program

Paper: Accessibility and the Journey to Work

Paper: Perspectives on Efficiency in Transportation

David Levinson

Network Reliability in Practice

Evolving Transportation Networks

Place and Plexus

The Transportation Experience

Access to Destinations

Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems

Financing Transportation Networks

View David Levinson's profile on LinkedIn

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David Levinson published on November 13, 2004 6:40 PM.

Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems was the previous entry in this blog.

Questions in Transportation: Part One is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories

Monthly Archives

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en