A cost-benefit analysis of high-speed rail

Tyler Cowen from the blog Marginal Revolution discusses A cost-benefit analysis of high-speed rail, following up on the critique of Glaeser by Avent and Freemark and others.

... "I'm not sure what discount rates he is using but even if we put that problem aside this screams out: don't do it. Given irreversible investment, lock-in effects, and required hurdle rates of return, this still falls into the "no" category. And that's an estimate from an advocate writing a polemic on behalf of the idea. I'm not even considering the likelihood of inflation on the cost side or the public choice problems with getting a good rather than a bad version of the project. How well has the Northeast corridor been run? "
David Levinson

Network Reliability in Practice

Evolving Transportation Networks

Place and Plexus

The Transportation Experience

Access to Destinations

Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems

Financing Transportation Networks

View David Levinson's profile on LinkedIn

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David Levinson published on August 27, 2009 5:30 PM.

Fighting Ourselves Over Funding for Intracity Versus Intercity Transportation was the previous entry in this blog.

London Bus iPhone and iPod Touch Application is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.


Monthly Archives


Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en