Some thoughts on high-speed rail - part 6: Nuisance effects


High-speed rail while providing potential benefits at the nodes, guarantees costs along the lines. Evidence from hedonic price studies (the same kind of studies that were used to assess the accessibility benefits of public transit in a previous section) show that each additional decibel of noise reduces home value by 0.62 percent (Levinson et al. 1997). Using the methodology in (Levinson et al. 1997) , the noise per train, and the number of trains per hour determine a noise exposure forecast. Applying the noise exposure forecast to the number of houses effected by each level of noise, and summing over all of the houses, and multiplying by the value of each house, gives the economic noise damages associated with the trains. So for instance, for a project running 20 trains per hour at 241 km/h through an area with 1000 housing units per square kilometer, each with a value of $250,000 would produce a total noise damage cost per kilometer of track of $1.975 million, a not insignificant cost. For a line of 500 km, this would be a system noise cost of nearly $1 billion. These relationships are non-linear, even one train per hour would produce a total cost of $269 million. Running 20 trains at an average speed of 350 km/h would produce a cost of $1.5 billion.

The noise damages can be avoided if preventive measures are adopted. These include acquiring a much wider right-of-way so there is no housing near the tracks, or noise walls. Whether those costs are less expensive than accepting damages depends on the circumstances.


I have been following your series of blog posts on High Speed Rail for the past week. Back in 2007 as an undergrad @ the University of Minnesota I wrote my senior thesis on the need for High Speed Rail in the Midwest. I am still very passionate about High Speed Rail but am having trouble breaking into the industry.
Onto my question:
While not to get into high technical terms, High Speed Rail train sets do produce noise but are often quieter than freight rail trains; what is the comparable noise damage associated with say a Highway project such as the Crosstown (35W and Highway 62) here in Minneapolis? How much have the sound walls protected home values for the neighborhoods that border 35W?
Are the two comparable in terms of noise damage costs, or is there a different formula completely for road projects?

David Levinson

Network Reliability in Practice

Evolving Transportation Networks

Place and Plexus

The Transportation Experience

Access to Destinations

Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems

Financing Transportation Networks

View David Levinson's profile on LinkedIn

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David Levinson published on April 27, 2010 5:40 AM.

New York City Subways: Interactive Ridership Map was the previous entry in this blog.

Some thoughts on high-speed rail - part 7: Summary and conclusions is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.


Monthly Archives


Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en