Gravelization

| 1 Comment

The Star Tribune writes about: Making a rural comeback: The old gravel road

Finally some realism and responsibility about resurfacing rural roads:

With maintenance costs included, engineers have often used a rule of thumb that a road needs 150 to 200 cars a day, or the equivalent in heavy-weight traffic, to be worth paving.

...

To tear up a thinly paved road and add some new gravel, Ridenour said, costs his county about $5,000 a mile. Resurfacing can run about $100,000.
...

"I'd rather have concrete, but it's just so expensive," [Tony Monat] said. "And really, why should everybody in the rest of the county help pay for my hard surface road?"  

1 Comment

Curious where that 150-200 VPD came from. I'm pretty sure I recall previous MnDOT literature suggesting that 400 VPD was the point where paving became viable.

David Levinson

Network Reliability in Practice

Evolving Transportation Networks

Place and Plexus

The Transportation Experience

Access to Destinations

Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Intelligent Transportation Systems

Financing Transportation Networks

View David Levinson's profile on LinkedIn

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by David Levinson published on March 30, 2011 8:00 AM.

Maplewood looks at socializing trash was the previous entry in this blog.

Bridges do not repair themselves is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories

Monthly Archives

Pages

Powered by Movable Type 4.31-en