February 28, 2005
Monday Melancholy

On this Monday, I give you a quiet, melancholy look at things that have been lost. And sometimes that which has been lost can never be found again.

In the March issue of National Geographic there is a great photo of a funnel cloud of starlings. This reminded me of an experience I had as a teenager when our family made its annual fishing trip to Yellowstone National Park for cutthroat trout.

It was always a two-day excursion to reach the park from North Dakota. The first day we would usually get to Billings late and set up camp along the Yellowstone River. On one such occasion, as I was sitting along the riverbank at sunset, a huge flock of starlings flew in from over a bluff.

The starlings wheeled like a giant blanket flung into the sky. Like sentient smoke, they banked and turned in unison, passing so close overhead I heard their wings ripping the air. When the flock flew in front of the setting sun, the world grew darker. I shivered even though it was early June and warm enough for me to be shirtless.

The sheer numbers were amazing, maybe 50,000 birds, like the flock in the National Geographic photograph. The bird vortex moved east, over the bluff until the sun brightened again, pressing pleasant heat against the back of my hands and torso.

I had brought my binoculars to look for wildlife and now I used them to follow the flock. Through the lenses, the birds became singular and I could follow discrete groups. They swirled, coming straight at me for a moment, then sliding away. I continued to scan the flock until I reached the leading edge: birds on one half and sky on the other. They switched direction and the leaders became the followers. I took the binoculars away and blinked at their loss of individuality.

In the middle, where the birds were thickest, the shape was black, a sinuous, twisting dark cord. One dot separated itself from the others, flying against the current. I saw it only for a second, but it was distinctly larger than the starlings, and its wing beat was different. I focused the binoculars again, my breath coming fast, and scanned the flock. It would be unusual for a single bird to fly with the starlings.

There was nothing for several minutes but the horde streaming by. Then the strange bird emerged with long, slender wings whose tips were very sharply pointed, making a striking and unique silhouette. And it was fast - much faster than the starlings and twice their size. The cloud shifted, swallowing it, as the entire flock drifted slowly east, farther into the plains.

I consulted some of my bird guides later that evening back in camp and learned that it had been a peregrine falcon. The peregrine is the fastest bird on record, reaching horizontal cruising speeds of 40 to 55 mph. When swooping, the peregrine flies at much greater speeds, however, varying from 99 to 273 mph!

This falcon had swooped into a flock of starlings in the tens of thousands. It hadn't even thought twice about doing so. It changed the entire dynamic of the flock and stood out with its great speed, strength, courage and determination. It was one amongst thousands.

Starlings are great in numbers worldwide; in some states, the American peregrine falcon is listed as endangered -a rare, fast bird. While the starlings were exciting to watch, the falcon swooping amongst the flock took my breath away.

When the Minnesota Vikings traded Randy Moss this week, they took away the peregrine falcon that has excited us since 1998. They took away the single player that took our breath away.

Now, all Vikings fans have left to watch is a flock of starlings. Our peregrine falcon has been taken away. Is there another one out there?

Family Plug

For those who enjoy The Wife'sŪ blog, she has written a new entry...Spring Fever. Head over to her blog and catch it!

Posted by maasx003 at February 28, 2005 6:35 AM
Comments

I have a problem with this entry. Is our goal as an NFL football team to marvel at the spectacular nature of an individual ie Randy Moss (while still going 8-8). Or are we in the business of winning championships. Who has been the peregrine falcon on the Patriots the last four years when they have won 3 super bowls. Granted if the Vikings don't spend some of the money they saved from dumping Moss (which that is the only reason they did it in the first place) then I am ok, bring in your Ty Law's and Donavan Darius's and you won't hear a peep out of me because it comes down to this. WINNING. How many times has the Vikings with Moss made it to the playoffs? Are you kidding me, we did have the best reciever in the league, I will agree that he may have been the best player in the league but we didn't have a winning team. I love Randy Moss and I think he is a tremendous talent and I wish the best of luck to him on the stat sheets so he can make all the money in the world, but for me and my team The Minnesota Vikings, may we win Super Bowls a-plenty with guys who let their play on the field (on every single down) do the talking.

Posted by: ajj90 at February 28, 2005 1:22 PM

This is exactly the type of discussion I was hoping this entry would encourage. Thanks for taking the time to write down your thoughts. I mean it. Your summary is spot on.

Sometimes, I will post things just to have the reader get the ol' ticker thinking. Ask my two good game-day buddies "The Commish" and "Piss Boy". We often exchange e-mails offering views we don't believe but want to stimulate conversation or "make the other guy mad" just for the hell of it. Some of our best discussion start this way. Should have seen our conversation this morning on whether Daunte will be a Pro Bowl QB this year without Moss.

Anyway, I will miss Moss. He was our falcon amongst a sea of starlings. But, while our falcon did make watching the flock that much more enjoyable, did it make it stronger? We'll find out.

Thanks again for the excellent comment. Keep 'em coming.

Posted by: Brian Maas at February 28, 2005 2:08 PM

We have to face it as vikings fans that we don't have a three step drop, route precise quarterback in daunte culpepper. While I am ok with that, in the past I have not been ok with Linehan's game plan which tried to put daunte in that role. If Steve Loney and Mike Tice are commited to making the "running" team that we hear about, I think that can only benefit Daunte Culpepper and I do indeed think he can make it without Randy Moss. I am glad that Daunte Culpepper is our quarterback because the nightmare threat that he is. I mean one or two guys have to spy him all game. I know I am just speculating and time will tell, but I believe in a Moss-less Daunte. Not because of what he did last season w/ the Moss injury but because we finally have a run first guy (assuming all good OL coaches our run first guys) making the offense happen. By the way, while I am on it, we are lucky to get rid of Linehan. I can't believe others thought so high of him. He took literally all the right tools for an offense and underachieved last year, have fun in Miami with who as a running back and who as a quarterback! serves him right and we got a blessing in disguise on that one.

Posted by: ajj90 at February 28, 2005 9:18 PM

Well, at least the falcon won't be eating any more of our starlings. Perhaps the flock will now prosper!

Posted by: Dave at March 2, 2005 2:48 AM