I’ve never heard as much bitching and moaning from NFL fans post Super Bowl. Everyone seems to have spent Monday around the water cooler belligerent about the officiating from Super Bowl XL. Everyone is of the opinion that the newly crowned Super Bowl champions did not as much merit their crown but bought it instead. And the blogosphere is all in a froth ober it, such as the boys over at Pro Football Talk who posted this photo:

Funny stuff.
Even former coaches have offered up the opinion that the best team went home from Detroit as losers. Such as this former, and much respected coach:
Pittsburgh won the Super Bowl, beating Seattle 21-10 on Sunday at Ford Field in Detroit. But Bud Grant, who took four Vikings teams to the big event, thought the NFC champion Seahawks were the better team, even though they lost.
"If they played a two-out-of-three or three-out-of-five series, I think Seattle would win," Grant said. "I don't think either is a great team."
I'm not going to enter the debate of which was the better team and if the fix was on for the Steelers. I thought the game was awful. I thought the commercials were even worse (save for "The Streaker"). So I really don't want to dwell on yet another b-o-r-i-n-g Super Bowl.
What should be addressed is the antiquity of having over-weight middle aged men try and call a decent game. There should never be a NFL playoff game in which the outcome has been dictated by the officials. And that is happening just far too often within recent memory.
Don't you think?
That component of the game, the game which we all love, needs to be addressed. The sooner the better. The boys over at Pro Football Talk also agree. And they have come up with some ideas that appear pretty far-fetched but should at least merit discussion.
We've previously argued that the NFL should install a computerized system into the end-zone pylons that would determine whether the ball touches the plane. If such a system were in place, one of the most hotly-debated calls from Super Bowl XL (i.e., whether Big Ben got the tip of the ball onto the front of the goal line) would have been a no-brainer. Per the computer system, the ball either went in, or it didn't. Sure, some people would still bitch about the outcome, but it would be another level of protection over and above the frailties of one man making a snap decision and the inherent imperfection of camera angles.
And.......
Here's the biggest innovation we're proposing. Video replay should become an integral tool for the determination of whether the officials got it right. And not just for the stuff that currently is reviewable -- for everything.
The key here is to come up with a quick and reliable way of permitting the replays to be checked. But the answer is easy. The NFL should install at each stadium a secure wireless network that would allow key shots to be immediately fed via a replay official working in the network trailer to a screen that is either strapped to the referee's wrist or palm.
And the referee should have the ability, upon review of the images between plays, to change anything.
For example, on that very questionable offensive pass interference call that wiped out a first-quarter touchdown reception by Seahawks receiver Darrell Jackson, Bill Leavy could have promptly looked at the replay on his Dick Tracy wristwatch and concluded that there were offsetting penalties on the play, since there was illegal contact with Jackson as he was entering the end zone.
It was that phantom pass intereference call against Jackson that I thought laughable. And gave me all the information I need to know now that the NFL is fixed and that the officials can, and will, throw games. For if Jackson was pushing off that what was it that this thug was doing on December 28th, 1975.

The flag is thrown on Jackson but way back in 1975 the officials did not call Drew Pearson for shoving Vikings cornerback Nate Wright just before catching Roger Staubach's Hail Mary pass in a NFC playoff game?
Replays show Pearson and Wright running side-by-side, and then as Pearson "adjusts" to the underthrown ball, Wright somehow flies forward at an odd angle. After making the catch, Pearson looked back for a flag and started celebrating only when he realized he'd gotten away with the most obvious offensive pass interference in football history.
What do you think? Should the NFL overhaul the officiating? How 'bout the SB? Was the Steeler victory earned or did they simply have the love of the refs behind them?
That's all just whiskey talk. The game is the game officials make mistakes, coaches make mistakes, players make mistakes. If they want a perfect game then they should just get Madden tournement going and feed it live on the NFL network. Seattle fans are starting to act like Viking fans, every game that's lost is the officials fault. I challenge anyone to over-turn the TD by BR. The switch of the ball at the end of the play is not what you watch. Where was the ball at when he was falling down? Did the ball break the plane? The plane goes up all the way to the ceiling, could you tell? I couldn't, indisputable evidence, I think not. Offensive push off, yes, defensive pass interference yes, but we saw it in slow mo and the whole play the ref didn't. Bottom line is you are not going to push off 3 feet in front of the ref without getting a call whether it's pass interference by the defense or offense. Sorry Seattle fans you lost, Pit pulled out more plays than you did period end of story. You choked at the end of the first half and second half. Sound familar fellow Viking fans. Coach Holemgren you have the league MVP and don't use him? That's what Seattle fans should be in an uproar about. It was working and you don't use it. Does this sound familar fellow Viking fans? The day the NFL takes the human equation out of the game is the day I just switch to NASCAR and forget about the NFL. Sat. NCAA football, Sundays NASCAR.
Posted by: lonnie at February 7, 2006 08:54 AMGive Jackson the TD, and it's 21 - 17. Steelers still win. Holmgren got away from things he was having success with. After the 1st quarter, how many passes did Jackson catch? How many were thrown to him? How many rushes did Alexander have in the 2nd half?
Pittsburgh WAS the better team. They played a lousy game and still won. They had some calls go their way, and it sucks that more didn't go Seattle's way. Was it a fix? No way!
And that Drew Pearson catch, if I remember correctly a flag was thrown. But, the Cowboys declined the defensive pass interference call...
Posted by: DouglasG at February 7, 2006 09:40 AMI'm all for doing whatever can be done to improve the officiating. Having said that, the refs did not decide this game.
There was really only one blatantly bad call, and that's the call against Hasselbeck for going after the blocker's knees. The rest of the calls were simply close calls that had to go one way or the other.
Yes, I've seen receivers do more than Jackson did and not get flagged. I've also seen receivers do less than Jackson did and get flagged. The pass interference call is not an exact science. The fact is that he did push off, and he did it right in front of the referee. I don't think he has a big complaint coming that it was called.
The Roethlisberger touchdown call also could have gone either way. I've watched it several times, and I think that, while he was in the air, there was a time when a part of the ball was above a part of the chalk line.
The bottom line is that if both those calls had gone the other way, and Seattle had won, we'd be hearing from Pittsburgh fans about how the game was stolen from them. The refs didn't cause Seattle to mismanage the clock at the end of both halves, the refs didn't cause Seattle to drop numerous passes, and the refs didn't cause Hasselbeck to throw an interception.
If Seattle had made as few mistakes as the referees did, they'd have won the game.
Posted by: Jeff A at February 7, 2006 01:53 PMThe refs didn't drop Hasselbeck's passes. The refs didn't fail to tackle Parker on his 75 yard run. Yeah, the refs made some dopey calls, but Seattle actively lost that game.
Officiating should be better, I agree.
Those lousy Cowboys. That lousy game. Didn't Fran Tarkenton's dad pass away during that game? At least when the refs blew that call they got injured via flying bottles. Refs these days have no accountablility (unless someone puts a rock through their window, which I don't condone).
Posted by: Peter at February 7, 2006 05:32 PMGranted this will only be the fifth comment posted to this entry, but I find it interesting that a majority of voters say the refs handed Pittsburgh the game, yet every comment indicates the opposite. Don't any of those who think the refs handed Pittsburgh the game want to defend their position? Or do you think Mr. Cheer or Die said it so well that you have nothing to add?
Posted by: Jeff A at February 8, 2006 01:22 PMBeats me. I voted that the Steelers won fair and square, but there are a handful of teams that could've beat 'em in the big game. The whole post season and the last 4 weeks or so of the regular season were weird.
Posted by: Peter at February 8, 2006 02:08 PM