April 30, 2006
"Squealing with Anger" by Mr. Cheer Or Die


accident.jpg


Many of you who know me well also understand that I wear my emotions on my sleeve. And I just want to open with that because I could come back here later this week and be in a different frame of mind over what transpired over the last 48-hours at the draft war room inside Winter Park.

But, as of right now I'm too infuriated to even articulate about the picks made on the second day. Just too incensed. And I know some of you, especially the younger fans, won't understand my anger. (And there will be those even angrier than myself.) So, let me try and elaborate for all those you think I’m being too harsh in my assessment.

It's been 46-years since the inception of the team. And the Vikings have yet to win a Super Bowl. So, the fans tend to magnify everything that happens with the team in an attempt to find the promised land.

SB04a.gif


superbowl_08.jpg

When a team has been to the Super Bowl four times and come up empty, the fans start reaching for excuses and help. To the fans, progress always seems slow. In fact, fans don't want improvement. We want a ring! And we want it yesterday.

sb9.gif


superbowl_11.jpg

Whenever I'm sick, I'm always reminded of how the Vikings fans magnify every little move the Vikings make. You must know that feeling when all you have to do is lie in bed and concentrate on your condition. It's impossible not to focus on yourself. All your little aches and pains seem magnified. You watch yourself for the slightest signs of improvement. If there isn't any, you wonder why. You wonder what's happening. You start worrying about what you might have done differently to avoid being laid up.

The same with the Vikings. We'll analyze the hell out of every move, every trade, the coach, and even the food served at the MetroDome. So, exactly how do I usually keep a smile on my face?

First off, I gave Zygi Wilf a honeymoon period. And I still don't really have any issues with a man who has spent more in a single year than the previous did in five. Even Red McCombs enjoyed immense popularity his inaugural season. I also gave a honeymoon period to Brad Childress which was suppose to last one full season.....but that period may have abruptly ended over the weekend. And I also gave a honeymoon period to Fran Foley which lasted as long as a marriage with Zsa Zsa Gabor did....to any of her many husbands.


dummiesdraftguide.jpg

So, for Vikings owners, coaches (Bud Grant excluded), administration, and players, our adoration can be fleeting. Especially when owners decide to raise ticket prices early in the year followed by a crappy draft. But I'm getting off topic a bit. (For a complete rundown on the history of ticket rate increase (and hijacking) please read more here.)

All we really ask of our Vikings owners and players is that we receive your undivided attention and effort. Or at least feign it. We don't like to be shared. Especially when the new owner is exploring the purchase of a Major League Soccer team to bring to the Twin Cities. Perhaps that fits into his new stadium plans or he has another goal in mind. But, the new owner hasn't even reached the Big Dance with the Purple yet. As The Wife® will tell me, "Keep your eyes over here, Mister!"

Yes, Mr. Wilf opened up his pocket book and brought the Vikes closer to the salary cap maximum. I'm not saying Zygi has to spend just to spend. But when the opportunity to vastly improve the team at a weak position presents itself the reply should be, "Cash or check?" and not, "I'll pass."

In that regard, Zygi gets high, high marks.

Additionally, I truly understand the need to bring in additional income for advertising by renting space for signage throughout the MetroDome which was done under McCombs. But, the appearance was more in line with a Texas league high school football than a professional football team. Last season, Zygi took a look-see for himself. He understood being an ECG (East Coast guy) and all. Again, two huge thumbs up in improving the look of the Dome.

And Wilf is riding a high approval rating here on the Viking Underground. Wilf got an 86% approval rating for April. For the year, Zygi actually improved to an overall 87% approval rating. I wonder if that will hold in May given the recent uniform change and then what I am referring to as a draft debacle.

Note: The May Zygi Approval Rating poll is now available. Just navigate to along the left frame to the poll area. And directly underneath the approval poll is a new poll on which NFC North team had the best overall draft.

With any draft, one has to allow time to judge the value of the players drafted. It will be interesting to see how the "experts" grade the team but I have to think no higher than a "C" which is again, helped by the first two picks which I truly loved.

But we aren't even sure Chad Greenway or Cedric Griffin will be "all that and a bag of chips" either. This could be one of the worst drafts EVER in the history of the team.

For example, the Vikes opening day linebacker corps for opening day could be Ben Leber at strong-side, EJ Henderson at middle and Greenway at weak. Um, don't you need at least one guy who can take on a block? There was Abdul Hodge for the taking. Numerous times in the second round and again early in the third. Instead, Hodge was picked up by the Packers. Now the Vikes have to face AJ Hawk, Hodge, and either Nick Barnett or Na’il Diggs twice a year. Hell, the Pack could even go 3-4! And do you know how pissed I get when I have to tip my hat to the freakin’ Packers!!!????!!!!

Then there was the reach for Tarvaris Jackson. I fully understand that other teams were looking to move up and “steal him” from the Vikes. But, c’mon!?!? That was a lot to spend for him. Yes, Jackson has got an absurd arm. Yes, the pundits said the arm of Jackson might be the best in the draft. But, the big negative in his game is Jackson has trouble absorbing an offense and taking it to the field. The West Coast offense is not an easy offense to learn. And the team let a QB leave that had a freakish arm who was already a Pro Bowler and familiar with the personnel. He just didn’t want to be here. So, we are now supposed to start from scratch!?!? (Recall the 46-year Super Bowl draught?)

I might be just too upset to think straight. I know I'm too upset to write any more for a few days and will look for the analytical honey-sweet tones of Vikes Geek to perhaps set me straight....or vindicate my current gut feelings.

How about you? Am I being harsh? Do you consider this draft to be a stinker or does it have the aroma of a Super Bowl? Can you put a smile back on my face? If so, I'd love to hear from you. Tell me what I am missing, please! And grade out the Vikes draft in the poll below.




Update: Sunday evening 9 PM CST

Best comment fed back to me so far....."No Steller names, but all soild players. Remember the Pats?" Slight smile starting to crack on left side of face. Keep them coming!

Vikes Free Agent Draft Summary 2006: Know anyone? Leave a comment if you do.









PLAYER



PLAYER

POSTION

SCHOOL

Stinson, Albert

OT

Jackson State

Carter, Jason

WR

Texas A&M

Baskett, Hank

WR

New Mexico

Jackson, Steven

FB

Clemson

Henderson, Taureen

HB

Texas Tech

Torp, John

P

Colorado

Palermo, Jason

C/G

Wisconsin

Gordon, Charles

CB

Kansas

Penn, Donald

OT

Utah State

Smith, Kyle

WR

Youngstown State

Cobb, Robert

CB

Massachusetts

Mathis, Wendell

HB

Fresno State

Mitchell, Jayme

DE

Mississippi

McKenzie, Kyle

LB

Minnesota

Nealy, Barrick

WR

SW Texas State

Hopoi, Manase

UT

Washington

Hoyte, Oliver

LB

NC State

 

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.

Posted by maasx003 at April 30, 2006 03:53 PM
Comments

Hey, Brian, cheer up!

It seems as though this trade for a starting right guard from Philadelphia, Artis Hicks, may have brightened up what I might consider a grade "C" draft, or at least a "disappointing" draft...

I don't know what was so great in last year's draft! Sure most of them are still on the team, but none of them contributed as much as we had hoped. Even our two first-round picks struggled, Troy Williamson & Erasmus James. I was disappointed with those picks too, considering we could have drafted that stud middle linebacker Johnson that KC drafted and WR Mark Clayton instead. Both would have made their marks as starters. Guard Marcus Johnson still hasn't matrialized. Hopefully this year those three will improve.

I agree with you, however, in being disappointed because we didn't pick up Hodge at the MLB position who remained available for several of the middle rounds.

Maybe, just maybe, that unknown quarterback from Alabama will be able to learn from Brad Johnson and the coaching staff and be ready to start in the next year or two. If that happens, and he is really good, this draft can then be redefined as a very good draft...
Mike

Posted by: Mike at April 30, 2006 07:39 PM

This was a crazy draft. It was so disconcerting that it was hard to follow. I mean 2nd round for a guy not even listed in many publications as worthy of mentioning in 25 quarterbacks. And our center who can't really play center or any other position on the line cause he's really just too tall to move. The Dummy book cover really says it all. The first picks and the second day seemed alright although we did pick up a DE that was benched in his Junior year. Let's just hope it is us who are dummies and the Triangle is MENSA. I agree they should have drafted additional linebackers. It's not like they've got the position solved. Maybe they will pick up a veteran cut.

Amazing Website!

Posted by: Erisa at April 30, 2006 07:42 PM

I think inexperience cost us a third round pick in this draft. If we were planning on trading up to get Jackson, we should have just taken him at pick 51 and kept both of our thirds and taken Cook and an ILB there. I think the Cook pick is the one nobody really understands. I can understand the Jackson pick because of his huge upside and the rumors that teams ahead of us in Round 3 had interest.

I also like the manuevering that got us the OLineman from Philly. BC is pencilling him in at RG as the starter so our line will be revamped 80% from what we had last year.

Posted by: Scott at April 30, 2006 08:14 PM

Thought a C- yesterday, and I suppose the addition of a veteran guard will let me bump it up to a C. I would like to believe that the trust was prepared and not overmatched, but it seems that a fast one was pulled on them (at least that's the reason they are giving...interest by others in 'their guys') and the reaction was to burn most of the first day picks. When your draftees pretty much admit they were expecting calls on Sunday, then you have to believe that round 2 was much too soon to take them.

Posted by: Jeff in GFK at April 30, 2006 08:58 PM

I think you're being a little too harsh, COD. We didn't do amazing in the draft but it wasn't too bad, either. Think of it this way... at least we didn't pick Marcus Vick.

Posted by: Timm at April 30, 2006 09:27 PM

I'm mystified by the Cook pick like everybody else but that's really the only one. I do agree, in hindsight, that it would have made alot more sense to use the Cook pick on Tarvaris. However, the two picks from Sunday both look real good from my quick tour around the web so I'm willing to give the Triangle of Authority the benefit of the doubt and assume there must be something really extra special about Cook that nobody else on the planet understands.

Overall, I think I'd give it a B. There seem to be a lot of people already yacking up the Tarvaris pick as a good one. At least it's marginally exciting to have an actual project QB around. Who knows, a year on the bench, a season in NFL Europe and who knows? And remember it's not just Johnson that can teach him. McMahon already knows Childress' offense.

Posted by: Jake at April 30, 2006 09:29 PM

I want to trust in the "Triangle." The "Triangle" will come through for us in the long run. But, I hope they just had jitters for their first draft because they didn't do a very good job of managing the picks. Perhaps the UDFAs we signed: WR Hank Baskett UNM, DB Charles Gordon KU, RB Taureen Henderson TexTech, among others ( http://kffl.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169984 ) will make this draft worthwhile. Hopefully, our picks that seem like reaches will prove otherwise in the long run. I think the "triangle" panicked. I can't grade our draft at this point because I'm of the philosophy that you can't grade a draft until a few years later. I'll give the "Braintrust" a grade of "D" for the way they managed the last three picks of the first round. We should have come away with five picks on the first day with Jackson being one of them. I can't fault "The Triangle" for drafting Jackson in the second if they really thought the guy was the fourth best QB prospect. Heck, they still could have taken Cook in and Dominique Byrd in the third if they played the draft right...look at how Denver moved up, and the packers moved around. I like that they drafted Greg Blue in the 5th. And, if Childress thinks that Artis Hicks will know what he expects from the O-line and will be our starting RG in September, fine. Ray Edwards? I don't know much about him. I'll do some searches.

Love your graphics COD.

Posted by: Daren "The Hiking Viking" at April 30, 2006 09:30 PM

One more thought. I wonder if they're possibly thinking of turning that Safety they picked up on Sunday into an LB?

Posted by: Jake at April 30, 2006 09:48 PM

Come on man. It sounds like you have been following football long enough to know that " Names" dont mean anything in this day and age. I have been a vikes fan since I could walk. Oh the history of this franchise is very frustrating I agree, However you and I both know of players like Hines Ward, Steve Smith, Tom Brady and so on. I am not sold on any of the three Qb's at the top of the draft.....I start thinking Kyle Boller, Akili Smith, Tim Couch.
I guess my point is ...We should not grade this draft till we see what we have on the field.
We could be the next New England? I hope that our draft personel sees something that we as people who haven't followed these guys dont. Tarvaris is very Raw but I think has a better arm then all 3 top QB's.
I would have liked to see Hodge with one of our pics. We will just have to wait and see. I think all these guys can get some PT and be sucessful from our system. I thought I was upset but when I did research on all these guys the sky is the limit. The DE that was benched it was for personal reasons between the coach and him to the num nuts that posted above. Thats half the problem most people dont know anything about these guys...."ESPN and the professionalsdraft analists are as accurate as weather people" Stay positive because I think we will see how good we did in this draft in time. It could be worse we could be depending on the MEATHEAD and his staff to bring guys along which would give us a new perspective.
BLankITCoverage- Vikingsarmy

Posted by: BlanKITCoverage at April 30, 2006 09:49 PM

Come on man. It sounds like you have been following football long enough to know that " Names" dont mean anything in this day and age. I have been a vikes fan since I could walk. Oh the history of this franchise is very frustrating I agree, However you and I both know of players like Hines Ward, Steve Smith, Tom Brady and so on. I am not sold on any of the three Qb's at the top of the draft.....I start thinking Kyle Boller, Akili Smith, Tim Couch.
I guess my point is ...We should not grade this draft till we see what we have on the field.
We could be the next New England? I hope that our draft personel sees something that we as people who haven't followed these guys dont. Tarvaris is very Raw but I think has a better arm then all 3 top QB's.
I would have liked to see Hodge with one of our pics. We will just have to wait and see. I think all these guys can get some PT and be sucessful from our system. I thought I was upset but when I did research on all these guys the sky is the limit. The DE that was benched it was for personal reasons between the coach and him to the num nuts that posted above. Thats half the problem most people dont know anything about these guys...."ESPN and the professionalsdraft analists are as accurate as weather people" Stay positive because I think we will see how good we did in this draft in time. It could be worse we could be depending on the MEATHEAD and his staff to bring guys along which would give us a new perspective.
BLankITCoverage- Vikingsarmy

Posted by: BlanKITCoverage at April 30, 2006 09:50 PM

One of the biggest losers in the draft is poor Michael Bennett! Here he signs with the N.O. Saints to try to resurrect his career, with high hopes of getting a starting job again and now has to play behind with probably one of the most hyped and talented players in the past decade, Reggie Bush.

I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for now. Studwell stuck up for the Cook pick, and he has the reputation for getting things correct more often than not. Gilliam, from what I read, turned the team on to Jackson, again he's been no slouch in finding talent. Although the GM and coach are different the scouting staff for the most part is the same one that we have respected for years.

Until we find out that Foley or Childress really went out of there way to run counter to the recommendations of the scouting staff (much like Denny did), let's wait and see how things pan out.

Posted by: Brent at April 30, 2006 10:03 PM

I'm not wild about some of these picks, but they could work out. I agree with most of the folks. They could have probably had most of these same guys without all the trading around.

WAIT! THIS JUST IN! MATT MILLEN HAS JUST ANNOUNCED THAT ERNIE SIMS WILL BE CONVERTED TO WIDE RECEIVER TO KEEP THE TRADITION ALIVE...

I just wonder what Mike Tice would have done.

I think Tarvaris is a very intriguing pick. In reading around the various websites rating this draft, most are not too impressed with us, but say if he works out, this will have been a pretty good draft for us. On the other hand, I have been waiting since 1961 and am getting a little tired of it.

Posted by: Dave at April 30, 2006 10:14 PM

I'm really impressed with the list of undrafted free agents the Vikings picked up.

CB Charles Gordon was projected as a first day pick by a lot of people. Sports Illustrated had him as the top undrafted player in the country; Scott Wright had him at #6. Not sure why he fell; he was one of those Will Blackmon/Devin Hester types who played a number of different DB positions, a little WR, and special teams and seemed to do them all well. Lacks great speed but apparently has superlative instincts. A real coup.

P John Torp was widely regarded as the top undrafted punter in the country.

WR Hank Baskett is a big (6' 3") red-zone threat type WR with good hands whose only knock is a lack of top-end speed. He might compete with Aaron Hosack for the 5th WR job. He was mostly regarded as a 5th round pick.

RB Taurean Henderson is an excellent receiver out of the backfield (he posted 98 receptions as a freshman) and makes for a good 3rd down back type. He was also generally regarded as a 5th rounder.

ILB Oliver Hoyte seemed to be getting a lot of attention leading up to the draft and I'm suprised he wasn't taken; New England in particular seemed interested in him. He's considered to be a very intelligent player.

Plus I love that they picked up local LB Kyle McKenzie.

Posted by: J. Ryan at April 30, 2006 10:25 PM

I personally know Taurean Henderson, in large because I played football as a fullback here for two seasons. First I would like to say that his posted time of 4.63 is bogus... he is in the 4.4 4.3 range, and if you saw him on the field, you would figure that out in a hurry! He has the hands of a wide reciever and the pass blocking skills of a Moe Williams type player. All we do here is pass, notice that's why I'm not playing, electing instead to goto Medical School. I think Henderson will make the 53 man roster, and see the field eventually. I also like the pick up of Hank Baskett. Over all I loved the Vikings draft, maybe because I'm not a name slut and know we really got some SOLID football players...especially Cedric Griffin from UT, he is my RIVAL, you know he is good if I am saying he's got skills!!!! Give the new Regime a break! Thanks for your time- Jo

Posted by: Jo Calihan at April 30, 2006 11:21 PM

Personally, the draft was a major disappointment for me when the Vikes didn't trade up for Leinart or Cutler. The way the reached in the 2nd round made it even more unbearable that they didn't package something to move up. I assumed when they didn't move up that they thought the picks were just too valuable. And then they burn them on guys most people agree would have last a round or two longer. Unbelievable.

Posted by: Scott H at May 1, 2006 02:40 PM

you are worried about facing Nick Barnett and N'ail Diggs? Unbunch your panties. Plus we have a corner who can be called Bob Cobb. Good times...Good times.

Posted by: brad at May 1, 2006 04:17 PM

I find it interesting your claim is the Vikings didn't do well in the draft because you could have seen them getting the players they took with their third and fourth picks were guys who could have been available in the 5th round. Interesting when one of the scenarios you laid out that you'd be happy with for the draft before saw the Vikings take players with their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th picks who would have been available in the fifth round.

Not saying the players are great picks, no way of knowing that yet. But clearly you had very little idea of a guys worth and how teams valued them going into the draft.

Posted by: MC at May 2, 2006 02:08 AM