Why I try to ignore political discussions

This comic refers to a recent Salon article about the "Ask the President" rallies. You have to suscribe to Salon (for a fee) to read the entire article, but I've attached the text below. Apparently, the Bush camp is screening attendees and their questions, forcing everyone to sign an oath of loyalty to Bush & the GOP. How many things are wrong with this picture?
http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2004/08/19/ask_bush/index.html
"Isn't this a democracy?"
At staged "Ask President Bush" events, audience members have to pledge
their allegiance to his reelection to gain admission. Bush has forgotten
who's sovereign in America.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Sidney Blumenthal
Aug. 19, 2004 | Before attending a rally to hear Vice President Dick
Cheney, citizens in New Mexico were required to sign a political loyalty
oath approved by the Republican National Committee. "I, (full name) ...
do herby (sic) endorse George W. Bush for reelection of the United
States." The form noted: "In signing the above endorsement you are
consenting to use and release of your name by Bush-Cheney as an endorser
of President Bush."
Around the country, Bush is campaigning at events billed as "Ask
President Bush." Only supporters are allowed entrance. Talking points
are distributed to questioners. In Traverse City, Mich., a 55-year-old
social studies teacher who wore a small Kerry sticker on her blouse had
her ticket torn up at the door. "How can anyone in the United States
deny someone entry?" she asked. "Isn't this a democracy?"
At every "Ask President Bush" rally, Bush repeats the same speech,
touting a "vibrant economy" and his leadership in a war where "you
cannot show weakness." He introduces local entrepreneurs who praise his
tax cuts. (More than 1 million jobs have been lost in his term, the
worst record since Herbert Hoover.) Then Bush calls on questioners. More
than one-fifth of them profess their evangelical faith or denounce gay
marriage. In Niceville, Fla., one said: "This is the very first time
that I have felt that God was in the White House." "Thank you," replied
Bush. Another: "Mr. President, as a child how can I help you get votes?"
In Albuquerque, he received this question: "It's an honor every day when
I get to pray for you as president." And this one: "Thank God we finally
have a commander in chief." Others repeat attack lines on John Kerry's
military record to which Bush responds with an oblique but encouraging
"thanks."
Bush's overriding strategy is to bolster his credential as a decisive
military figure and to impugn his opponent's manhood. In his latest TV
commercial, he says, "We cannot hesitate, we cannot yield, we must do
everything in our power to bring an enemy to justice before they hurt us
again." But, according to the Washington Post, for the last two years he
has uttered the elusive Osama bin Laden's name only 10 times, and "on
six of those occasions it was because he was asked a direct question ...
Not once during that period has he talked about bin Laden at any length,
or said anything substantive." At "Ask President Bush" events, he
mentions Sept. 11 only to raise the threat of Saddam Hussein.
Vice President Dick Cheney (who had five draft deferments during
Vietnam, saying he had "other priorities") sneered at John Kerry for
even using the word "sensitive" with respect to counterterrorism. Not
one war was "won by being sensitive," mocked Cheney. Kerry, in fact, had
called for fighting "a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic,
more proactive, more sensitive war on terror that reaches out to other
nations and brings them to our side and lives up to American values in
history." Cheney's distortion is calculated to attempt to portray Kerry
as somehow effeminate.
At the same time, a Republican front group of Vietnam veterans financed
by a major Bush contributor is running an ad campaign claiming Kerry's
account of his military record is false. But not one of these veterans
served with him on his boat. They remain enraged that he had the
temerity to return home decorated with combat medals to become a leader
against the war.
During the Vietnam War, of course, Bush famously used his father's
connections to get a posting as a pilot in the Texas Air National Guard,
known as the "Champagne Unit" because it was filled with the sons of
privilege. After refusing to submit to a routine drug test, he was
suspended and never flew again. He got himself transferred to the
Alabama National Guard, but apparently never turned up for his tour of
duty. Not one person has stepped forward to claim he served with Bush
there. Since then, he has withheld his full military records. Now he
encourages smears that claim a genuine war hero, wounded three times,
has lied about his service and is a coward. But this is more than a
classic case of projection. The more profound issue is not who served in
Vietnam and who dodged. It is whether the president is a sovereign.
Since the birth of the American party system, presidential candidates
have always gone directly to the sovereign people, who are the only
source of legitimacy and power, to make their case. After the Democratic
Convention, Kerry traveled from New England to the Pacific Northwest
doing just that. Not one of the hundreds of thousands who attended his
open-air rallies had to pledge allegiance to him, and he encountered
organized Bush hecklers as part of the price. At Bush's rallies he is
the packaged president as pseudo-populist. But these controlled
environments reflect his deeper view of the presidency as sovereign,
preempting democracy.
Floundering in the polls, without a strategy for Iraq, unwilling to say
the name of bin Laden, he is always secure in the knowledge that the
cheering multitudes before him have been carefully selected. Strutting
and swaggering on the stage as though he has conquered the crowd, he
plays to true believers. But a 55-year-old social studies teacher from
small-town Michigan who would not bend her knee had her ticket to see
her president ripped up. "Ask President Bush" has crystallized the
essential underlying question, framed succinctly by the greatest
American poet of democracy, Walt Whitman, who wrote, "The President is
there in the White House for you, it is not you who are here for him."
- - - - - - - - - - - -
About the writer
Sidney Blumenthal, a former assistant and senior advisor to President
Clinton and the author of "The Clinton Wars,"
Comments
This kind of stuff is hardly surprising these days. A practice such as this is in line with an administration who's reason for re-election consists of blatant lies and statements like, "re-elect us or suffer terrorist attack."
Posted by: Doc Dregs | September 17, 2004 04:04 PM