Baby returned to lying parents, police say-Local
A baby was either accidentally or intentionally injured, despite suspicions that the parents injured the baby, she was returned to her parents.
This article is interesting, because the police say in both articles at the beginning that the parents lied about the injury to the 15-year-old baby, but at the end both say that the baby was returned because they did not have sufficient medical evidence to prove that they were lying.
I feel that it should say that the baby was returned to her parents at the beginning of the article, because the whole piece makes you feel like the parents did it, but then at the end you not only think they did it you also feel like the legal system is totally whack. Howeve,r they do mention that the case is still opened and show that the baby was given back somewhat reluctantly
http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/local/16719124.htm
http://www.startribune.com/467/story/1008313.html