TwinCities.comhttp://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/16666507.htm, the website of the Pioneer Press did a follow up story today (Sunday) about the presence of PFBAs in the water supply of Washington and Dakota counties, linked to 3M's production of products containing PFCs, or petrofluorochemicals. PFCs are used by 3M in fire retardants, stain repellants, and other products manufactured by the company. PFBA is toxic to mice in large doses, leading to liver and thyroid problems.
The challenge in this article is to provide readers with how this information is being taken by residents of affected counties, and it does succeed on that level. The article's lead even starts out with the impact on one local woman. "Bonnie Saul doesn't trust her water anymore." It balances this with some background on the chemicals as well as the reactions of state lawmakers and the response by 3M.
However, one remark in the article seems a bit strange to me. "Most area water drinkers have not changed their habits, and state health officials are not recommending people in the affected areas avoid tap water." I had always assumed that all people are "water drinkers," though I could be wrong.
The Star Tribune covered the story on Feb. 3, with two articles on subject. One of them, written by Tom Meersman http://www.startribune.com/462/story/978332.html, focuses more on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's request for information regarding how the chemical was disposed of near Woodbury's border with Cottage Grove. The focus is actually not narrower in the Star Tribune's article, yet the impact of the news is completely absent. The Star Tribune covers a lot of ground, though, and still manages to give some breadth to the topic, covering public meetings, 3M's response to the issue, and some background on the chemicals themselves.