Aggression

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

blog 3 image 1.jpg

Aggression has always been a popular subject to portray in the media. From guys involved in fights to girls spreading rumors and excluding people, people have had a fascination with this issue. What interests me is the topic of how people become who they are. Is there a biological explanation or is a trait influenced more by the social environment? Aggression is one trait that many television shows and movies depict, such as Fight Club and Gossip Girl. Physically violent behavior is depicted more often in males, while relational aggression (indirect aggression) is more commonly shown in females.

The textbook explains that some scientists believe that higher aggression correlates to higher testosterone levels, but this is under debate since the correlation may also be true in the opposite direction. The textbook also details that female hyenas are more aggressive than their male counterparts. This supports the idea that aggression is related to testosterone levels since female hyenas show higher levels of a testosterone-related hormone, suggesting that testosterone does play a factor in aggression. But what are some other hypotheses that scientists have developed to explain aggression differences in males and females?

An article on Science Daily's website, "Why Men Are More Aggressive: What a Mother Should Know," suggests that the levels of aggression may be caused by the genes that are responsible for the neurotransmitter serotonin. In a study with Rhesus monkeys, a species of Old World monkeys who are known to be aggressive, show low levels of serotonin.

These are only a couple of a number of explanations for what causes aggression. These articles and explanations are all interesting I have is how I believe that aggression can be caused by genes as well as social pressures. However, the cause of aggression is still under research and will likely remain a controversial issue until more results from other studies are presented.

6 Comments

| Leave a comment

It was interesting to hear that genes could be related to aggression. Also your analysis of different forms of aggression, not just physical was interesting. I think mental aggression should also be looked at.

During the semester in psychology we've discussed a lot regarding aggression. Aggression seems to be a key attribute that was and maybe still is essential for human existence.Even Sigmund Freud believed that aggression (along with sexual impulses) is a basic instinct. Today it is often viewed as too violent for public behavior, but it will be interesting to see how aggression really is related to genes and why it affects some more than others (anger management etc.).

Especially in America, it seems that violence and aggression is at the cornerstone of media related outlets, such as television and video games. I'd agree that aggression seems to be related to testosterone (or perhaps simply the magnitude of whatever hormone your body naturally produces). Not to sound satirical, but I notice I'm a lot more aggressive and easy to snap right after I've spent the last half hour lifting weights to failure.
I think one of the reasons why violence is so prevalent in society today is because society condemns any actual aggressive tendencies, especially as a child. Sometimes, letting two kids rough each other up a bit is a lot more therapeutic than making them seek alternative routes to work out their differences.

I have no idea if this is true, but there could be evolutionary reasons for the differences in the types of aggression between males and females. Maybe because males were typically involved in more physical activities (labor, hunting, protecting), males that were stronger and more aggressive tended to survive better. On the other side, females could possibly have evolved to attack others more passive-aggressively in order to get what they want, since they do not rely as much on physical strength.

I don't know what to think about aggression -if/why it seems like men are more pron to aggression than women. I believe that environmental factors play a role in aggression because if their surrounding environment has a large proportion of aggression, it will become a factor in that person's life. I think it's more environmental than genetic because people learn aggression (fighting and rumors) by learning/seeing others.

When it comes to aggression, I think that it is more a factor of nurture, rather than nature. The environment in which you are raised in can play a significant role when it comes to how you react to different situations. For instance, if you have been on your own since the age of six, you might be more defensive and far more independent then say someone who has experienced a loving family all their life. I do not think that this justifies anything, however, I do think it should be taken into consideration when confronting different types of individuals.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by truel010 published on April 7, 2012 9:12 PM.

Intelligence > Media was the previous entry in this blog.

Who said I'm not intelligent? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.