With all these parameters, the equations are the following:
U1 = pb * ub + ugb(ts)
U2 = pnb * ub
U1 represents the expected utility of trying for good behavior, while U2 represents the expected utility of not trying for good behavior. If U1 is higher than U2, than I should try for the good behavior. Of course, the crux of these equations are the probabilities. If there is not much difference between pb and pnb, this means that I stand the same chance of being someone's bitch either way. In this case, I might as well go for good behavior. If there is much greater chance of being someone's bitch because of good behavior, well then maybe I should think about just waiting it out. Of course, this is a simple model. If you have any extensions that would make it more accurate, let me know. And if you think that this is disturbing, you should see the parameters I left out.
Posted by mill1991 at September 30, 2004 10:27 AM
| TrackBack
I have a question for Tim that I don't think was ever settled--are girls disturbed if you are dancing with them and they can feel your bulge?
Posted by: Dick Frisky at September 30, 2004 06:24 PMI have a question for Tim that I don't think was ever settled--are girls disturbed if you are dancing with them and they can feel your bulge?
Posted by: Dick Frisky at September 30, 2004 06:25 PMTim -
This is a well thought out hypothesis, however, it may very well be a moot point. Many states are going to "truth in sentencing". What this means, is you serve what you are sentenced. Wisconsin is one such state which is moving towards this, not sure what MN is doing? However, good behavior might get you something else of utility, say another piece of bread at dinner or maybe a extra episode of Star Trek before bed.
Wapner, J